广西师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 27-42.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.202606032501

• 智慧交通 • 上一篇    下一篇

DGA-YOLO:基于深度与几何感知的自动驾驶目标检测

李桂伸, 彭杰梁, 敖银辉*   

  1. 广东工业大学 机电工程学院, 广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-25 修回日期:2026-06-29 出版日期:2026-11-05 发布日期:2026-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 敖银辉(1973—), 男, 湖北襄阳人, 广东工业大学教授, 博士。E-mail: aoyinhui@gdut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(2022A1515012080)

DGA-YOLO: depth and geometry-aware object detection for autonomous driving

Li Guishen, Peng Jieliang, Ao Yinhui*   

  1. School of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2026-03-25 Revised:2026-06-29 Online:2026-11-05 Published:2026-11-10

摘要: 针对自动驾驶中目标尺度多变、环境复杂导致的检测精度低和鲁棒性不足问题,本文提出一种基于YOLO26改进的深度与几何感知目标检测算法DGA-YOLO (depth and geometry aware YOLO)。首先,设计R-G-Depth早期融合与迭代深度补全策略强化三维空间感知;其次,在主干引入语义-几何聚合器(semantic-geometric aggregator,SGA),双流并行提取局部语义与宏观几何上下文;再次,构建各向异性几何卷积(anisotropic geometric convolution,AGC),并联深度可分离与逐点卷积提取各向异性特征,结合容量下界约束的尺度感知注意力;最后,在融合层部署大核选择重构器(large selective reconstructor,LSR),以大核空洞卷积平滑噪声、十字条形卷积提纯几何特征。实验表明,该算法在KITTI上的平均精度均值(mAP)中的mAP@50与mAP@50∶95较基准算法分别提升2.5与4.4个百分点,在物理模拟雨、雾、雨雾交加极端环境与零样本泛化实验中均显著优于基准算法,鲁棒性与泛化能力优异。

关键词: 自动驾驶, 目标检测, YOLO26, 多模态融合, 深度与几何感知

Abstract: To address the problems of low detection accuracy and insufficient robustness caused by variable target scales and complex environments in autonomous driving, an improved depth and geometry aware object detection algorithm based on YOLO26, DGA-YOLO (depth and geometry aware YOLO), is proposed. Firstly, an R-G-Depth early fusion and iterative depth completion strategy is designed to enhance 3D spatial perception. Secondly, a Semantic-Geometric Aggregator (SGA) is introduced into the backbone to extract local semantics and macroscopic geometric context in parallel through two streams. Thirdly, an Anisotropic Geometric Convolution (AGC) is constructed, which parallels depthwise separable and pointwise convolutions to extract anisotropic geometric features, combined with a capacity-bounded scale-aware attention. Finally, a Large Selective Reconstructor (LSR) is deployed in the fusion layer, smoothing noise with large-kernel dilated convolutions and purifying geometric features with cross-strip convolutions. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm improves the mean Average Precision (mAP) on the KITTI dataset, with mAP@50 and mAP@50∶95 exceeding the baseline by 2.5 and 4.4 percentage points, respectively; it also significantly outperforms the baseline under physically simulated rain, fog, and rain-fog extreme conditions and in zero-shot generalization tests, demonstrating excellent anti-interference robustness and generalization capability.

Key words: autonomous driving, object detection, YOLO26, multi-modal fusion, depth and geometry awareness

中图分类号:  TP391.41

[1] 任柯燕, 谷美颖, 袁正谦, 等. 自动驾驶3D目标检测研究综述[J]. 控制与决策, 2023, 38(4): 865-889. DOI: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2022.0618.
[2] 罗会兰, 陈鸿坤. 基于深度学习的目标检测研究综述[J]. 电子学报, 2020, 48(6): 1230-1239. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2020.06.026.
[3] Law H, Deng J. CornerNet: detecting objects as paired keypoints[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 765-781. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_45.
[4] Duan K W, Bai S, Xie L X, et al. CenterNet: keypoint triplets for object detection[C]//2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2019: 6569-6578. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00667.
[5] Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, et al. SSD: single shot multibox detector[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 21-37. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2.
[6] Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, et al. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 779-788. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.91.
[7] Ren S Q, He K M, Girshick R, et al. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6): 1137-1149. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031.
[8] 赵洋, 王潇, 蔡柠泽, 等. 自动驾驶目标检测不确定性估计方法综述[J]. 汽车工程学报, 2024, 14(5): 760-771. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1469.2024.05.02.
[9] 杨锋, 丁之桐, 邢蒙蒙, 等. 深度学习的目标检测算法改进综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2023, 59(11): 1-15. DOI: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2209-0312.
[10]Peng L, Xu J K, Cheng H R, et al. Learning occupancy for monocular 3D object detection[C]//2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2024: 10281-10292. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00979.
[11]Qian R, Garg D, Wang Y, et al. End-to-end pseudo-LiDAR for image-based 3D object detection[C]//2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2020: 5880-5889. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00592.
[12]Liu Y, Sun P, Wergeles N, et al. A survey and performance evaluation of deep learning methods for small object detection[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 172: 114602. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114602.
[13]张新钰, 邹镇洪, 李志伟, 等. 面向自动驾驶目标检测的深度多模态融合技术[J]. 智能系统学报, 2020, 15(4): 758-771. DOI: 10.11992/tis.202002010.
[14]Chen X Z, Ma H M, Wan J, et al. Multi-view 3D object detection network for autonomous driving[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2017: 6526-6534. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.691.
[15]Ku J, Mozifian M, Lee J, et al. Joint 3D proposal generation and object detection from view aggregation[C]//2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018: 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8594049.
[16]李珣, 张友兵, 周奎, 等. 基于BEV多模态特征融合的三维目标检测算法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2025, 42(12): 3823-3831. DOI: 10.19734/j.issn.1001-3695.2025.03.0101.
[17]Liu H B, Wu C, Wang H J. Real time object detection using LiDAR and camera fusion for autonomous driving[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13: 8056. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35170-z.
[18]Zhao X M, Sun P P, Xu Z G, et al. Fusion of 3D LIDAR and camera data for object detection in autonomous vehicle applications[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(9): 4901-4913. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2966034.
[19]Winter J, Nowak R. Point cloud densification algorithm for multiple cameras and lidars data fusion[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(17): 5786. DOI: 10.3390/s24175786.
[20]张介嵩, 黄影平, 张瑞. 基于CNN的点云图像融合目标检测[J]. 光电工程, 2021, 48(5): 200418. DOI: 10.12086/oee.2021.200418.
[21]郝佳, 姚国英, 周剑, 等. 基于图像和点云融合的三维小目标检测方法[J]. 测绘通报, 2025(3): 33-38. DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2025.0306.
[22]Cheng X J, Wang P, Yang R G. Depth estimation via affinity learned with convolutional spatial propagation network[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018:108-125. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01270-0_7.
[23]邵延华, 张铎, 楚红雨, 等. 基于深度学习的YOLO目标检测综述[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(10): 3697-3708. DOI: 10.11999/JEIT210790.
[24]陈旭, 彭冬亮, 谷雨. 基于改进YOLOv5s的无人机图像实时目标检测[J]. 光电工程, 2022, 49(3): 210372. DOI: 10.12086/oee.2022.210372.
[25]程换新, 徐皓天, 骆晓玲. 基于改进YOLOv7的自动驾驶目标检测方法[J]. 激光杂志, 2024, 45(7): 91-96. DOI: 10.14016/j.cnki.jgzz.2024.07.091.
[26]张琴, 郭为安. 深度学习小目标检测算法综述[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2025, 42(10): 2893-2904. DOI: 10.19734/j.issn.1001-3695.2025.03.0067.
[27]Linder T, Pfeiffer K Y, Vaskevicius N, et al. Accurate detection and 3D localization of humans using a novel YOLO-based RGB-D fusion approach and synthetic training data[C]//2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2020: 1000-1006. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196899.
[28]Wang Y, Zell A. Yolo+FPN: 2D and 3D fused object detection with an RGB-D camera[C]//2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2021: 4657-4664. DOI: 10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9413066.
[29]Sapkota R, Cheppally R H, Sharda A, et al. YOLO26: key architectural enhancements and performance benchmarking for real-time object detection[PP/OL].V5.arXiv(2026-03-16)[2026-06-28].https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.25164.
[30]Geiger A, Lenz P, Stiller C, et al. Vision meets robotics: the KITTI dataset[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2013, 32(11): 1231-1237. DOI: 10.1177/0278364913491297.
[31]Tian Y J, Ye Q X, Doermann D. YOLOv12: attention-centric real-time object detectors[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems38 (NeurIPS 2025).Red Hork, NY: Curran Associates Inc.,2025: 78433-78457. DOI: 10.52202/085713-2627.
[32]Hidayatullah P, Syakrani N, Sholahuddin M R, et al. YOLOv8 to YOLO11: a comprehensive architecture in-depth comparative review[PP/OL]. V4. arXiv(2026-05-04)[2026-06-28].https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.13400.
[33]Wang A, Chen H, Liu L H, et al. YOLOv10: real-time end-to-end object detection[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37(NeurIPS 2024). Red Hork, NY: Curran Associates Inc., 2024: 107984-108011. DOI: 10.52202/079017-3429.
[34]Wang C Y, Yeh I H, Liao H Y M. YOLOv9: learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information[C]//Computer Vision-ECCV 2024. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024: 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_1.
[35]Terven J, Córdova-Esparza D M, Romero-González J A. A comprehensive review of YOLO architectures in computer vision: from YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAS[J]. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 2023, 5(4): 1680-1716. DOI: 10.3390/make5040083.
[36]Wang C C, He W, Nie Y, et al. Gold-YOLO: efficient object detector via gather-and-distribute mechanism[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (NeurIPS 2023). Red Hark, NY: Curran Associates Inc., 2023: 51094-51112. DOI: 10.52202/075280-2224.
[37]Liu S H, Zha J L, Sun J, et al. EdgeYOLO: an edge-real-time object detector[C]//2023 42nd Chinese Control Conference (CCC). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2023: 7507-7512. DOI: 10.23919/CCC58697.2023.10239786.
[38]Li H L, Li J, Wei H B, et al. Slim-neck by GSConv: a lightweight-design for real-time detector architectures[J]. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 2024, 21(3): 62. DOI: 10.1007/s11554-024-01436-6.
[39]Cheng T H, Song L, Ge YX, et al. YOLO-World: real-time open-vocabulary object detection[C]//2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2024: 16901-16911. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01599.
[1] 王成龙, 宋强, 李文峰, 张仕民. PAM-DETR: 基于改进RT-DETR的医用手套小目标缺陷检测算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(4): 79-95.
[2] 杨云波, 南新元, 蔡鑫. 基于改进YOLO11n的光伏板缺陷检测方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(3): 47-59.
[3] 钱俊磊, 王熹之, 曾凯, 杜学强, 刘贺, 朱立光. 基于MHTD-YOLO11n的钢材表面缺陷检测算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(3): 60-74.
[4] 毕桦男, 高丙朋, 蔡鑫. SOP-DETR:基于改进RT-DETR的海下垃圾检测算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(3): 75-88.
[5] 田晟, 冯帅涛, 李嘉. 一种基于复合框架的城市道路场景车辆轨迹提取方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(2): 31-51.
[6] 田晟, 赵凯龙, 苗佳霖. 基于改进YOLO11n模型的自动驾驶道路交通检测算法研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(1): 1-9.
[7] 黄文杰, 罗维平, 陈镇南, 彭志祥, 丁梓豪. 基于YOLO11的轻量化PCB缺陷检测算法研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(1): 56-67.
[8] 魏梓书, 陈志刚, 王衍学, 哈斯铁尔·马德提汗. 基于SBSI-YOLO11的轻量化轴承外观缺陷检测算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(6): 80-91.
[9] 刘廷汉, 梁艳, 黄鹏升, 闭金杰, 黄守麟, 李廷会. 基于改进YOLOv8s的人脸痤疮小目标检测[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(5): 114-129.
[10] 王旭阳, 章家瑜. 基于跨模态增强网络的时序多模态情感分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 97-107.
[11] 汤亮, 陈博文, 牛一森, 马荣庚. 基于YOLOv8的雾天车辆行人实时检测方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(3): 72-83.
[12] 郭翔羽, 石天怡, 陈燕楠, 南新元, 蔡鑫. 基于YOLO-CDBW模型的列车接触网异物检测研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(2): 56-69.
[13] 刘玉娜, 马双宝. 基于改进YOLOv8n的轻量化织物疵点检测算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(2): 83-94.
[14] 涂智荣, 凌海英, 李帼, 陆声链, 钱婷婷, 陈明. 基于改进YOLOv7-Tiny的轻量化百香果检测方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(5): 79-90.
[15] 田晟, 胡啸. 基于Transformer模型的车辆轨迹预测[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(3): 47-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发