广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 208-217.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2020122002

• • 上一篇    下一篇

广西白头叶猴和黑叶猴理毛行为的比较研究

冯月婷1,2,3, 韦周全3, 黄中豪1,2,3*, 李友邦1,2,3*   

  1. 1.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室(广西师范大学),广西 桂林 541006;
    2.广西珍稀濒危动物生态学重点实验室(广西师范大学),广西 桂林 541006;
    3.广西师范大学 生命科学学院, 广西 桂林 541006
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-20 修回日期:2021-02-26 发布日期:2022-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 李友邦(1973—),男,广西富川人,广西师范大学教授,博士。E-mail: lyb_2001@126.com
    黄中豪(1978—),男,广西来宾人,广西师范大学副研究员,博士。E-mail:hzh773@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31960104, 31960106)

Comparative Study on Allgrooming Behavior of White-headed Langur (Trachypithecus leucocephalus) and François' langur (Trachypithecus francoisi) Living in Guangxi, China

FENG Yueting1,2,3, WEI Zhouquan3, HUANG Zhonghao1,2,3*, LI Youbang1,2,3*   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    3. College of Life Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China
  • Received:2020-12-20 Revised:2021-02-26 Published:2022-05-31

PDF (PC)

138

摘要： 白头叶猴Trachypithecus leucocephalus与黑叶猴T.francoisi是喀斯特地区的近缘物种,具有相似的栖息地、身体大小和社会结构及行为特征。为了比较2个物种的理毛行为特征和社会功能的异同,2016年2月至2017年1月,采用焦点动物取样法(focal animal sampling)和连续记录法(continuous recording)对2种叶猴的理毛时间和理毛姿势进行研究。结果表明,每1%单位体表面积上,白头叶猴可自理毛区域、无法自理毛区域和难自理毛区域获得理毛时间占比分别为0.67%±0.21%、1.01%±0.47%和1.44%±0.46%;黑叶猴上述3个区域的理毛时间占比分别为0.44%±0.14%、1.61%±0.58%和1.21%±0.54%。2种叶猴在不同理毛区域获得理毛时间支持理毛行为的卫生功能假说。白头叶猴和黑叶猴在肛门生殖区每1%单位表面积获得理毛时间占比为7.12%±2.26%和10.61%±7.68%,表现出高度的选择性;2种叶猴肛门生殖区中采用趴的理毛姿势的时间占比分别为9.47%±3.12%和14.72%±11.57%。在肛门生殖区的互相理毛行为中,2种叶猴的理毛行为均支持缓和功能假说。白头叶猴和黑叶猴采用无眼神接触的理毛姿势分别占47.86%±16.23%和63.76%±17.26%,白头叶猴的相互理毛行为不支持缓和功能假说,黑叶猴的相互理毛行为支持缓和功能假说。

关键词: 白头叶猴, 黑叶猴, 理毛行为, 卫生功能假说, 缓和功能假说

Abstract: White-headed langur (Trachypithecus leucocephalus) and François' langur (Trachypithecus francoisi) are sibling species sharing similarities in habitat type, body size and social structure. Comparion of their allogrooming behavior are essential for understanding the similarities of their behavioral characteristics and social functions. Data regarding allogrooming time budget to various body region and grooming posture of the two langurs were collected in Fusui, China from February 2016 to January 2017 using focal animal sampling and continuous recording. Results showed that in each 1% skin surface, the allogrooming percentage of easy to reach area, inaccessible area and difficult to reach area of white-headed langur were 0.67%±0.21%, 1.01%±0.47% and 1.44%±0.46%, and that of François' langur were 0.44%±0.14%, 1.61%±0.58% and 1.21%±0.54%. The allogrooming percentage of different surface area of the two species supported the hygienic functional hypothesis. In each 1% skin surface, the allogrooming percentage of anogenital area of white-headed langur and François' langur were 7.12%±2.26% and 10.61%±7.68%, showing high selectivity. Percentages of allogrooming time received of groveling of white-headed langur and François' langur in anogenital area were 9.47%±3.12% and 10.61%±7.68%, which supported the distensive functional hypothesis. The grooming dyads of white-headed langur and François' langur adopted postures by avoiding facing each other, which accounted for 47.86%±16.23% in white-headed langur and 63.76%±17.26% for François' langur, indicating that the distensive functional hypothesis was not supported by the allogrooming percentage of white-headed langur and supported by the allogrooming percentage of François' langur.

Key words: white-headed langur, François' langur, allogrooming similarity, distensive functional hypothesis, hygienic functional hypothesis

中图分类号: 

  • Q958.1
[1] DUNBAR R I M. The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms[J]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2010, 34(2): 260-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001.
[2] 李保国, 张鹏, 渡边邦夫, 等. 川金丝猴的相互理毛行为是否具有卫生功能[J]. 动物学报, 2002, 48(6): 707-715. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-7302.2002.06.001.
[3] BORRIES C, SOMMER V, SRIVASTAVA A. Weaving a tight social net: allogrooming in free-ranging female langurs (Presbytis entellus)[J]. International Journal of Primatology, 1994, 15(3): 421-443. DOI: 10.1007/BF02696102.
[4] KOENIG A, BORRIES C. Socioecology of Hanuman langurs: the story of their success[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News and Reviews, 2001, 10(4): 122-137. DOI: 10.1002/evan.1026.
[5] REICHARD U, SOMMER V. Grooming site preferences in wild white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) [J]. Primates, 1994, 35(3): 369-374. DOI: 10.1007/BF02382733.
[6] KUMAR A, SOLANKI G S. Observation of grooming behaviour in wild capped langur Trachypithecus pileatus[J]. Journal of Primatology, 2014, 3(2): 1000119. DOI: 10.4172/2167-6801.1000119.
[7] 王凡, 李沂韦, 任宝平, 等. 滇金丝猴群中全雄单元理毛行为研究[J]. 普洱学院学报, 2019, 35(3): 17-20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8059.2019.03.006.
[8] SCHINO G, MAESTRIPIER D, SCUCCHI S, et al. Social tension in familiar and unfamiliar pairs of long-tailed macaques[J]. Behaviour, 1990, 113 (3/4): 264-272. DOI: 10.1163/156853990X00518.
[9] WEI W, QI X G, GUO S T, et al. Market powers predict reciprocal grooming in Golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana)[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(5): e36802. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036802.
[10] 北京大学心理学系灵长类动物研究小组, 湖北省神农架国家级自然保护区科考站. 金丝猴的社会:野外研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2000.
[11] ALEA V, BALDELLOU M, VEA J J, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of allogrooming behaviour in Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus[J]. Behaviour, 1999, 136(2): 243-256. DOI: 10.1163/156853999501306.
[12] CHIARELLO A G. Grooming in brown howler monkeys, Alouatta fusca[J]. American Journal of Primatology, 1995, 35(1): 73-81. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.1350350107.
[13] SCHINO G, DISORRENTINO E P, TIDDI B. Grooming and coalitions in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata): partner choice and the time frame reciprocation[J]. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2007, 121(2): 181-188. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.181.
[14] 王振兴, 王爱龙, 黄恒连, 等. 广西崇左白头叶猴国家级自然保护区及周边区域黑叶猴种群数量与分布[J]. 四川动物, 2014, 33(4): 487-492. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7083.2014.04.002.
[15] 周岐海, 黄恒连, 唐小平, 等. 白头叶猴日活动时间分配及其季节性变化[J]. 兽类学报, 2010, 30(4): 449-455. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.2010.04.013.
[16] 周岐海, 黄乘明, 李友邦. 笼养黑叶猴的相互理毛行为[J]. 兽类学报, 2006, 26(3): 221-225.
[17] 木仁, 楠田哲仕, 杨秉山, 等. 笼养黑叶猴(Trachypithecus francoisi)日活动时间分配及活动时间节律分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019 (13): 140-145, 149. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1050.2006.03.002.
[18] 田明亮, 郭爱霞, 谢绪昌, 等. 笼养黑叶猴日行为时间分配及其影响因素研究[J]. 野生动物学报, 2019, 40(3): 580-589. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2019.03.007.
[19] 叶智彰. 叶猴生物学[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 1993.
[20] 黄乘明, 李友邦, 周岐海. 白头叶猴对喀斯特石山生境的适应[J]. 生物学通报, 2016, 51(1): 1-4.
[21] 黄乘明, 周岐海, 李友邦. 黑叶猴的行为生态与保护生物学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2018.
[22] 陆施毅. 广西崇左白头叶猴与黑叶猴食物与空间生态位相似性研究[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2014.
[23] 李克因. 弄岗自然保护区地貌分区及地貌发育初考[J]. 广西植物(增刊), 1988(1): 33-51.
[24] 谭伟福. 广西自然保护区[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2014.
[25] 谢强, 卢立仁, 梁国飞. 白头叶猴环境生态的研究:白头叶猴栖息地植物区系分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1994, 12(3): 86-91. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.1994.03.018.
[26] ALTMANN J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods[J]. Behaviour, 1974, 49(3): 227-267. DOI: 10.1163/156853974X00534.
[27] 张鹏. 川金丝猴(Rhinopithecus roxellana) 的社群结构和理毛行为的研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2003.
[28] 张德军, 黎大勇, 胡杰, 等. 滇金丝猴雌性个体间的理毛行为[J]. 兽类学报, 2014, 34(1): 38-45. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.2014.01.005.
[29] GHIGLIERI M P. The chimpanzees of kibale forest: a field study of ecology and social structure[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984. DOI: 10.1007/BF02736390.
[30] 韦周全. 广西邻域分布白头叶猴和黑叶猴理毛行为研究[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2017.
[31] PÉREZ A P, VEÀ BARÓ J J. Does allogrooming serve a hygienic function in Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus?[J]. American Journal of Primatology, 1999, 49(3): 223-242. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(199911)49:3<223::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-9.
[32] 张源笙, 蒋志刚, 鲍伟东. 笼养川金丝猴理毛行为功能[J]. 兽类学报, 2019, 39(3): 323-332. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150214.
[33] BARTON R A. A comparative study of grooming interactions in primates[J]. Journal of the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust, 1983, 24: 26-36.
[34] JABLONSKI N G. Social and affective touch in primates and its role in the evolution of social cohesion[J]. Neuroscience, 2021, 464: 117-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.11.024.
[35] ALLANIC M, HAYASHI M, FURUICHI T, et al. Social influences on grooming site preferences in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, DRC[J]. Primates, 2020, 61(2): 213-223. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-019-00788-z.
[36] WU C F, LIAO Z J, SUEUR C, et al. The influence of kinship and dominance hierarchy on grooming partner choice in free-ranging Macaca mulatta brevicaudus[J]. Primates, 2018, 59(4): 377-384. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-018-0662-y.
[37] MISHRA P S, PAL A, VELANKAR A D, et al. Does rank rule? Rank-related grooming patterns in Nicobar long-tailed macaques Macaca fascicularis umbrosus[J]. Primates, 2020, 61(3): 443-453. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-020-00807-4.
[38] ALLANIC M, HAYASHI M, FURUICHI T, et al. Body site and body orientation preferences during social grooming: a comparison between wild and captive chimpanzees and bonobos[J]. Folia Primatologica: International Journal of Primatology, 2021, 92(2): 79-90. DOI: 10.1159/000512901.
[39] LIU Z J, WANG B S, NADLER T, et al. Relatively recent evolution of pelage coloration in Colobinae: phylogeny and phylogeography of three closely related langur species[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e61659. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061659.
[40] LIU Z J, ZHANG L Y, YAN Z Z, et al. Genomic mechanisms of physiological and morphological adaptations of limestone langurs to karst habitats[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2020, 37(4): 952-968. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msz301.
[41] 李生强, 黎大勇, 黄中豪, 等. 黑叶猴食物组成的地域性差异比较[J]. 兽类学报, 2016, 36(1) : 46-55. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.201601005.
[42] 张克处, 袁培松, 黄恒连, 等. 白头叶猴食物组成的地域性差异比较[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(1): 75-81. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2017.01.013.
[43] LEHMANN J, KORSTIENS A H, DUNBAR R I M. Group size, grooming and social cohesion in primates[J]. Animal Behaviour, 2007, 74(6): 1617-1629. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.025.
[44] KURIHARA Y, NISHIKAWA M, MOCHIDA K. Behavioral responses to changes in group size and composition: a case study on grooming behavior of female Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui)[J]. Behavioural Processes, 2019, 162: 142-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.03.005.
[1] 黄颖, 韦晓, 吴茜, 黄乘明, 孙涛, 周岐海. 白头叶猴旱季食物营养对食物选择的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 109-115.
[2] 郑景金, 梁霁鹏, 张克处, 黄爱面, 陆倩, 李友邦, 黄中豪. 基于木本植物优势度的白头叶猴食物选择研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(1): 53-64.
[3] 张克处,袁培松,黄恒连,唐小平,周岐海,黄中豪. 白头叶猴食物组成的地域性差异比较[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 35(1): 75-81.
[4] 周岐海, 黄恒连, 唐小平, 黄乘明. 白头叶猴全雄群的日活动节律和活动时间分配[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 30(3): 282-287.
[5] 吴茜, 黄中豪, 袁培松, 邓凤云, 周岐海. 广西弄岗黑叶猴食物的水分含量对食物选择的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 29(4): 117-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡锦铭, 韦笃取. 不同阶次分数阶永磁同步电机的混合投影同步[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 1 -8 .
[2] 武康康, 周鹏, 陆叶, 蒋丹, 闫江鸿, 钱正成, 龚闯. 基于小批量梯度下降法的FIR滤波器[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 9 -20 .
[3] 刘东, 周莉, 郑晓亮. 基于SA-DBN的超短期电力负荷预测[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 21 -33 .
[4] 张伟彬, 吴军, 易见兵. 基于RFB网络的特征融合管制物品检测算法研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 34 -46 .
[5] 王金艳, 胡春, 高健. 一种面向知识编译的OBDD构造方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 47 -54 .
[6] 逯苗, 何登旭, 曲良东. 非线性参数的精英学习灰狼优化算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 55 -67 .
[7] 李莉丽, 张兴发, 李元, 邓春亮. 基于高频数据的日频GARCH模型估计[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 68 -78 .
[8] 李松涛, 李群宏, 张文. 三自由度碰撞振动系统的余维二擦边分岔与混沌控制[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 79 -92 .
[9] 赵红涛, 刘志伟. λ重完全二部3-一致超图λK(3)n,n分解为超图双三角锥[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 93 -98 .
[10] 李梦, 曹庆先 , 胡宝清. 1960—2018年广西大陆海岸线时空变迁分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 39(4): 99 -108 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发