广西师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 245-256.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2025120502

• 分子生物学与生物技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于微卫星的黑颈鹤与灰鹤个体识别及亲缘关系研究

沈悦1,2, 戴传银1,2*   

  1. 1.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室(广西师范大学), 广西 桂林 541006;
    2.广西珍稀濒危动物生态学重点实验室(广西师范大学), 广西 桂林 541006
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-05 修回日期:2026-03-05 出版日期:2026-11-05 发布日期:2026-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 戴传银(1982—),男,安徽绩溪人,广西师范大学教授,博士。E-mail: daicy527@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32060310);广西科技项目(AD20159030)

Individual identification and genetic relationship analysis of black-necked cranes and common cranes based on microsatellite markers

Shen Yue1,2, Dai Chuanyin1,2*   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China
  • Received:2025-12-05 Revised:2026-03-05 Online:2026-11-05 Published:2026-11-10

摘要: 本文开发一套适用于黑颈鹤Grus nigricollis与灰鹤Grus grus的微卫星标记体系,旨在为二者的保护遗传学研究提供可靠工具。基于贵州草海国家级自然保护区采集的1 408根羽毛样品及2份肌肉DNA样本,利用微卫星标记对黑颈鹤与灰鹤进行个体识别和亲缘关系分析。通过位点筛选与优化,分别构建13个(黑颈鹤)和16个(灰鹤)位点的个体识别方案。该体系表现出极高的鉴别能力:黑颈鹤的无关个体基因型匹配概率(PID)和同胞个体基因型匹配概率(PIDsib)分别为5.797×10-11和4.886×10-5,灰鹤分别为1.308×10-18和2.700×10-7,成功鉴别出66只黑颈鹤和68只灰鹤个体。在此基础上,进一步评估位点数量对亲缘关系分析分辨率的影响:灰鹤基于16个位点的组合已能够稳定区分不同亲缘等级;黑颈鹤位点增至16个时能更准确区分不同亲缘等级。本文构建的微卫星系统为后续解析2种鹤类的社群结构、评估种群动态及实施科学保护管理提供关键技术支撑。

关键词: 黑颈鹤, 灰鹤, 微卫星标记, 个体识别, 亲缘关系

Abstract: This study developed a microsatellite marker system suitable for the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) and the Common Crane (Grus grus), aiming to provide a reliable tool for their conservation genetics research. Based on 1 408 feather samples and two muscle DNA samples collected from the Caohai National Nature Reserve in Guizhou, microsatellite markers were employed for individual identification and genetic relationship analysis of the two crane species. Through locus screening and optimization, individual identification panels comprising 13 loci (for Black-necked Crane) and 16 loci (for Common Crane) were constructed, respectively. The systems demonstrated extremely high discriminatory power: the probability of identity for unrelated individuals (PID) and the probability of identity among siblings (PIDsib) for the Black-necked Crane were 5.797×10-11 and 4.886×10-5, respectively, and 1.308×10-18 and 2.700×10-7 for the Common Crane. A total of 66 individual Black-necked Cranes and 68 individual Common Cranes were successfully identified. Furthermore, this study evaluated the impact of locus number on the resolution of genetic relationship analysis. The results showed that the 16-locus panel for the Common Crane could consistently distinguish different genetic relationship categories, while increasing the loci to 16 enabled more accurate discrimination of various genetic relationship grades for the Black-necked Crane. The microsatellite system established in this study provides crucial technical support for subsequent analyses of the social structure, population dynamics, and scientific conservation management of these two crane species.

Key words: black-necked crane, common crane, microsatellite markers, individual identification, genetic relationship

中图分类号:  Q959.7

[1] Bird Life International. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species[EB/OL]. (2020-07-24)[2025-11-18]. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22692162/180030167.
[2] 李筑眉, 李凤山. 黑颈鹤研究[M]. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2005.
[3] Zhang J, Cao H Q, Zhu Y, et al. An improved comprehensive model for assessing the heavy metals exposure towards waterbirds: a case report from Black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) in Caohai Wetland, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 264: 115431. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115431.
[4] 陈嘉珈, 蒲真, 黄中鸿, 等. 全球黑颈鹤越冬种群分布与数量[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 97-106.
[5] 胡雅滨, 李凤山. 鹤[M]. 昆明: 云南民族出版社, 2017.
[6] 钟平华, 李斌强, 林光辉. 全球数量最多的鹤: 灰鹤[J]. 生物资源, 2024, 46(3): 310. DOI: 10.14188/j.ajsh.2024.03.013.
[7] 国家林业和草原局. CITES附录Ⅱ物种名录[EB/OL]. (2023-02-23)[2025-11-18]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/.
[8] 约翰·马敬能, 卡伦·菲力普斯. 中国鸟类野外手册[M]. 卢何芬,译. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社, 2000.
[9] 陈永祥, 陈群利, 冯图. 贵州草海国家级自然保护区综合科学考察报告[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2021.
[10]晏玉莹, 刘延惠, 刘懿, 等. 贵州草海国家级自然保护区黑颈鹤、灰鹤种群迁徙动态初步研究[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2023, 51(4): 22-25, 34. DOI: 10.16709/j.cnki.gzlykj.2023.04.003.
[11]涂声蕾, 冉景丞, 杨杰, 等. 草海湿地越冬鸟类动态研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(22): 76-79.
[12]Gou X, Zhu Y, Sun X J, et al. Roosting-site selection by overwintering black-necked cranes in the Caohai wetland, Guizhou Province, China: implications for conservation management[J]. Zoological Studies, 2022, 61: e36. DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2022.61-36.
[13]Wu D W, Hu C S, Zhang M M, et al. Foraging habitat selection of overwintering Black-necked Cranes in the farming area surrounding the Caohai Wetland, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Avian Research, 2020, 11: 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-020-00192-y.
[14]段亚甜, 刘强, 雷宇, 等. 基于卫星跟踪个体的越冬灰鹤栖息地选择[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2392-2399. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202007.016.
[15]Li Y H, Jin Y Y, He X C, et al. Mechanisms of enhancing genetic fitness in Non-Kinship-Based Groups: insights from Black-necked Cranes[J]. Ecological indicators, 2024, 167: 112701. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112701.
[16]赛青高娃, 王子涵, 李全邦, 等. 藏羚交配群成员间亲缘关系及遗传多样性分析[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(2): 159-170. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150807.
[17]Estoup A, Jarne P, Cornuet J M. Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2002, 11(9): 1591-1604. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01576.x.
[18]Ali F, Suhail S M, Khan F A, et al. Microsatellite markers & mitochondrial D-loop based phylogenetic and diversity analysis in gabrali cattle[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2024, 56(8): 380. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04229-y.
[19]Wang Y R, Tang C, Xue P F, et al. Identification of genetic relationships and group structure analysis of Yanqi horses[J]. Genes, 2025, 16(3): 294. DOI: 10.3390/genes16030294.
[20]Punuru P R, Regula V, Metta M, et al. Genetic characterization of semi-arid sheep populations in India using microsatellite markers[J]. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2025, 6: 1553610. DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1553610.
[21]Hrebianchuk A E, Parfionava N S, Zabauskaya T V, et al. A panel of tetranucleotide STR markers as an alternative approach to forensic DNA identification of wolf and dog[J]. Animal Genetics, 2024, 55(3): 440-451. DOI: 10.1111/age.13428.
[22]Knapp S M, Craig B A, Waits L P. Incorporating genotyping error into non-invasive DNA-based mark: recapture population estimates[J]. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2009, 73(4): 598-604. DOI: 10.2193/2007-156.
[23]Marcy-Quay B, Wilson C C, Osborne C A, et al. Optimization of an amplicon sequencing-based microsatellite panel and protocol for stock identification and kinship inference of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush)[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2023, 13(4): e10020. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10020.
[24]Creel S, Spong G, Sands J L, et al. Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2003, 12(7): 2003-2009. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01868.x.
[25]Patta C, Singchat W, Thatukan C, et al. Optimizing Bangkaew dog breed identification using DNA technology[J]. Genes & Genomics, 2024, 46(6): 659-669. DOI: 10.1007/s13258-024-01510-0.
[26]Lohr M T, Krauss S L, Spencer P B S, et al. Widespread genetic connectivity in Australia’s most common owl, despite extensive habitatfragmentation[J]. Emu-Austral Ornithology, 2020, 120(3): 249-259. DOI:10.1080/01584197.2020.1794908.
[27]Foster Y, Dutoit L, Grosser S, et al. Genomic signatures of inbreeding in a critically endangered parrot, the kākāpō[J]. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 2021, 11(11): jkab307. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab307.
[28]Liker A, Bókony V, Kulcsár A, et al. Genetic relatedness in wintering groups of house sparrows (Passer domesticus)[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2009, 18(22): 4696-4706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04363.x.
[29]Gou X, Sun X J, Khattak R H, et al. An inference of the wading depths of the cranes in wintering wetlands through photographic sampling: a case study of black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) in Caohai Wetland, China[J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2022, 30(2): 331-339. DOI: 10.1007/s11273-022-09863-7.
[30]宋善海, 田鹏举, 段莹, 等. 威宁草海1968—2022年湖泊面积演变及气候变化分析[J]. 山地气象学报, 2025, 49(3): 27-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6598.2025.03.004.
[31]张海波, 粟海军, 刘文, 等. 草海国家级自然保护区冬季主要水鸟群落结构与生境的关系[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(5): 601-607.
[32]Horváth M B, Martínez-Cruz B, Negro J J, et al. An overlooked DNA source for non-invasive genetic analysis in birds[J]. Journal of Avian Biology, 2005, 36(1): 84-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03370.x.
[33]孙喜娇, 张明明, Larson H, 等. 贵州草海越冬黑颈鹤飞出飞回夜栖地行为节律初步观察[J]. 动物学杂志, 2018, 53(2): 180-190. DOI: 10.13859/j.cjz.201802003.
[34]Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, et al. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences[J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2008, 9(4): 299-306. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn017.
[35]安萌茵. 云贵高原上黑颈鹤(Grus nigricollis)的种群结构及其迁徙相关性[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2012.
[36]Du L M, Zhang C, Liu Q, et al. Krait: an ultrafast tool for genome-wide survey of microsatellites and primer design[J]. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(4): 681-683. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx665.
[37]Peakall R, Smouse P E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research: an update[J]. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28(19): 2537-2539. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
[38]Rousset F. Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of thegenepopsoftware for Windows and Linux[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2008, 8(1): 103-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x.
[39]Marshall T C, Slate J, Kruuk L E B, et al. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations[J]. Molecular Ecology, 1998, 7(5): 639-655. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x.
[40]Rice W R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests[J]. Evolution, 1989, 43(1): 223-225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x.
[41]Wang J L. Coancestry: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2011, 11(1): 141-145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02885.x.
[42]Wang J L. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness[J]. Genetical Research, 2007, 89(3): 135-153. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672307008798.
[43]Hu Y B, Nie Y G, Wei W, et al. Inbreeding and inbreeding avoidance in wild giant pandas[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2017, 26(20): 5793-5806. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14284.
[44]Blouin M S, Parsons M, Lacaille V, et al. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness[J]. Molecular Ecology, 1996, 5(3): 393-401. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00329.x.
[45]Rohlf F J. NTSYS-pc-numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.2[M]. New York: Biostatistics Inc, 1988: 16.
[46]Waits L P, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2001, 10(1): 249-256. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01185.x.
[47]郑凯丹, 汪巧云, 范朋飞, 等. 基于微卫星的欧亚水獭个体识别和遗传多样性[J]. 兽类学报, 2024, 44(2): 146-158. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.150814.
[48]Quainoo D K, Chalermwong P, Muangsuk P, et al. Genetic insights for enhancing conservation strategies in captive and wild Asian elephants through improved non-invasive DNA-based individual identification[J]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(5): e0320480. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320480.
[49]Broquet T, Ménard N, Petit E. Noninvasive population genetics: a review of sample source, diet, fragment length and microsatellite motif effects on amplification success and genotyping error rates[J]. Conservation Genetics, 2006, 8(1): 249-260. DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9146-5.
[50]Lathrop G M, Hooper A B, Huntsman J W, et al. Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 1983, 35(2): 241-262.
[51]Pei J, Bao P J, Chu M, et al. Evaluation of 17 microsatellite markers for parentage testing and individual identification of domestic yak (Bos grunniens)[J]. PeerJ, 2018, 6: e5946. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5946.
[52]Sellas A B, Feldheim K A, Bowie R C K. Permanent genetic resources: isolation and characterization of 10 tetranucleotide microsatellite loci in an enigmatic East African bird, the spot-throat (Modulatrix stictigula)[J]. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2008, 8(2): 342-344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01949.x.
[53]王立, 李严, 岳碧松, 等. 使用SPE软件筛选绿尾虹雉微卫星引物及其在亲缘关系鉴定上的应用[J]. 四川动物, 2022, 41(4): 371-378. DOI: 10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20210451.
[1] 魏朝宇, 汪小冬, 魏秀英, 袁鸿, 姚红艳, 陈敦学. 5个棘胸蛙养殖群体微卫星遗传多样性分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 40(6): 206-214.
[2] 张永德, 曾兰, 宾石玉, 杜雪松, 杨慧赞, 陈忠, 余艳玲, 林勇. 尼罗罗非鱼选育家系的遗传多样性研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 32(3): 94-101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发