广西师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 246-258.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2024092002

• 食品科学与工程 • 上一篇    

桃金娘果汁制备工艺优化及其品质评价

赵广河1,2,3*, 左盼2, 陈静2, 张弘2, 黄星琳4   

  1. 1.广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室(广西师范大学), 广西 桂林 541006;
    2.广西师范大学 生命科学学院, 广西 桂林 541006;
    3.广西师范大学 应用生物学研究所,广西 桂林 541006;
    4.河池市食品药品认证审评中心,广西 河池 547000
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-20 修回日期:2024-11-18 出版日期:2025-09-05 发布日期:2025-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 赵广河(1977—),男,河南南阳人,广西师范大学副教授,博士。E-mail:greatriver2007@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西自然科学基金(2022GXSFAA035523);广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室主任基金(LRCSU21Z0318)

Optimization of Preparation Technology of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Fruit Juice and Its Quality Evaluation

ZHAO Guanghe1,2,3*, ZUO Pan2, CHEN Jing2, ZHANG Hong2, HUANG Xinglin4   

  1. 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. College of Life Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    3. Institute of Applied Biology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    4. Hechi Center for Food and Drug Evaluation & Certification, Hechi Guangxi 547000, China
  • Received:2024-09-20 Revised:2024-11-18 Online:2025-09-05 Published:2025-08-05

摘要: 为解决桃金娘果汁加工过程中存在的出汁率低及品质较差等问题,通过响应面法优化超声波辅助酶解制备桃金娘果汁的工艺条件,并对果汁品质进行评价。结果表明,超声波辅助酶解制备桃金娘果汁的最优工艺条件:果胶酶和纤维素酶的质量比为1∶3、酶用量0.45%、酶解温度50 ℃、酶解时间1.5 h、超声功率密度16 W/L。在此条件下桃金娘果实的出汁率为75.13%,透光率为74.20%。与不超声不加酶法、加酶不超声法、超声不加酶法制备的果汁相比较,采用超声辅助酶法制备的桃金娘果汁出汁率和透光率最高,可溶性固形物和营养物质最多,而加酶不超声法制备的果汁具有最强的抗氧化活性和最高的感官评分值。

关键词: 桃金娘, 果汁, 酶解, 超声波, 品质评价

Abstract: Aiming to solve the problems of low juice yield and poor quality in the processing of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa fruit juice, the process conditions of ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis were optimized by response surface method, and then the quality of R. tomentosa fruit juice was evaluated. The results showed that the optimal processing conditions for R. tomentosa fruit juice were as follows: pectinase∶cellulase 1∶3, enzyme dosage 0.45%, enzymolysis temperature 50 ℃, enzymolysistime 1.5 h, ultrasonic power density 16 W/L. Under these conditions, the juice yield of R. tomentosa fruit was 75.13%, and the light transmission rate was 74.20%. Among the fruit juices prepared by four methods, namely the treatment without ultrasound wave and enzymes, enzymolysis treatment alone, ultrasound wave treatment alone, ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis treatment, the fruit juice prepared by ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis treatment had the highest juice yield, light transmission, soluble solids and nutrients, while the fruit juice prepared by enzymolysis treatment alone had the strongest antioxidant activity and the highest sensory score.

Key words: Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, fruit juice, enzymolysis, ultrasound wave, quality evaluation

中图分类号:  TS255.44

[1] ZHAO Z F, WU L, XIE J, et al. Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (aiton.): a review of phytochemistry, pharmacology and industrial applications research progress[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 309: 125715. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125715.
[2] SHIRATAKE S, NAKAHARA T, IWAHASHI H, et al. Rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa) extract and its component, piceatannol, enhance the activity of DNA polymerase and suppress the inflammatory response elicited by UVB-induced DNA damage in skin cells[J]. Molecular Medicine Reports, 2015, 12(4): 5857-5864. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4156.
[3] KUSUMA I W, AINIYATI N, SUWINARTI W. Search for biological activities from an invasive shrub species rosemyrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa)[J]. Nusantara Bioscience, 2016, 8(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.13057/nusbiosci/n080110.
[4] WU P P, MA G Z, LI N H, et al. Investigation of in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities of flavonoids rich extract from the berries of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Ait.) Hassk[J]. Food Chemistry, 2015, 173: 194-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.023.
[5] VO T S, NGO D H. The health beneficial properties of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa as potential functional food[J]. Biomolecules, 2019, 9(2): 76. DOI: 10.3390/biom9020076.
[6] 吴修仁. 广东药用植物简编[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社,1989: 317.
[7] 范琳琳, 王英, 程先玲, 等. 超声辅助酶解制备黑莓清汁工艺及其协同效应[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(6): 304-311. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180413-172.
[8] 杨芙莲, 聂小伟. 超声波辅助果胶复合酶酶解浸提红枣汁的工艺研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2010, 36(9): 97-101.
[9] 方晓彤, 王前菊, 穆波, 等. 超声波辅助酶法处理对百香果出汁率及品质的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2024, 15(10): 234-242. DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20240226007.
[10] 国家卫生健康委员会,国家市场监督管理总局. 食品中果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖、麦芽糖、乳糖的测定: GB 5009.8—2023[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2023.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品中还原糖的测定: GB 5009.7—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[12] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品中抗坏血酸的测定: GB 5009.86—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[13] DEWANTO V, WU X, ADOM K K, et al. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(10): 3010-3014. DOI: 10.1021/jf0115589.
[14] TI H H, LI Q, ZHANG R F, et al. Free and bound phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of milled fractions of different indica rice varieties cultivated in Southern China[J]. Food Chemistry, 2014, 159: 166-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.029.
[15] GAO Q H, WU C S, YU J G, et al. Textural characteristic, antioxidant activity, sugar, organic acid, and phenolic profiles of 10 promising jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) selections[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2012, 77(11): C1218-C1225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02946.x.
[16] BENZIE I F F, STRAIN J J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1996, 239(1): 70-76. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292.
[17] KASHYAP D R, VOHRA P K, CHOPRA S, et al. Applications of pectinases in the commercial sector: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 77(3): 215-227. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00118-8.
[18] WILL F, BAUCKHAGE K, DIETRICH H. Apple pomace liquefaction with pectinases and cellulases: analytical data of the corresponding juices[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2000, 211(4): 291-297. DOI: 10.1007/s002170000171.
[19] 肖东海, 周惠明. 白萝卜澄清汁的酶解工艺[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(14): 216-219, 223. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002- 0306.2013.14.066.
[20] 师聪, 李哲, 张建萍, 等. 超声波辅助酶法澄清树莓果汁的工艺优化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(1): 132-137. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020.01.022.
[21] 郭明遗, 邓艳, 王天鑫, 等. 超声辅助酶解提取水蜜桃果核多酚工艺优化及抗氧化性研究[J]. 食品与机械, 2023, 39(11): 204-210. DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2023.80202.
[22] XU L, HE W J, LU M, et al. Enzyme-assisted ultrasonic-microwave synergistic extraction and UPLC-QTOF-MS analysis of flavonoids from Chinese water chestnut peels[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2018, 117: 179-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.012.
[23] 高文涛, 贾艺彬, 温艳斌, 等. 酶解法制备黄花菜汁工艺优化及抗氧化性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2023,44(12): 164-171. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022080058.
[24] RODRIGUES D, SOUSA S, SILVA A, et al. Impact of enzyme- and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods on biological properties of red, brown, and green seaweeds from the central west coast of Portugal[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2015, 63(12): 3177-3188. DOI: 10.1021/jf504220e.
[25] 罗维巍, 吕琳琳, 孙丽阳, 等. 黑涩石楠总多酚超声辅助提取工艺优化、抗氧化活性评价及单体酚分析[J].中国酿造, 2024, 43(5): 199-205. DOI: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2024.05.031.
[26] 郭俊玲, 张杰, 张文刚, 等. 超声波辅助萌发处理富集黑青稞多酚的工艺优化及其酚酸组成分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44(12): 207-215. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022080325.
[27] 田怀香, 陈霜, 陈小燕, 等. 不同提取方式对萱草花中酚类物质及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(20): 303-312. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.20.034.
[1] 王月蓉, 赵广河, 赵丰丽, 覃云斌, 陈静, 张弘. 脐橙皮水溶性膳食纤维提取工艺优化及其体外益生活性评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(1): 101-109.
[2] 周子豪, 刘禹含, 谭艳红, 蒙玉清, 巫虹颖, 黄锦龙, 武正军. 酶法制备福寿螺内脏团抗菌肽[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(6): 154-161.
[3] 刘茜. 南方红豆杉提取物的抗氧化、抗肿瘤活性研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 34(4): 55-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 钟俏, 陈生龙, 唐聪聪. 水凝胶技术在微藻采收中的应用:现状、挑战与发展分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(6): 16 -29 .
[2] 施慧露, 莫燕华, 骆海玉, 马姜明. 檵木乙酸乙酯萃取物抑菌活性研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(1): 1 -8 .
[3] 贺青, 李栋, 罗思源, 贺寓东, 李彪, 王强. 超宽带里德堡原子天线技术研究进展[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(2): 1 -19 .
[4] 黄仁慧, 张锐锋, 文晓浩, 闭金杰, 黄守麟, 李廷会. 基于复数协方差卷积神经网络的运动想象脑电信号解码方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(3): 43 -56 .
[5] 田晟, 熊辰崟, 龙安洋. 基于改进PointNet++的城市道路点云分类方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 1 -14 .
[6] 黎宗孝, 张健, 罗鑫悦, 赵嶷飞, 卢飞. 基于K-means和Adam-LSTM的机场进场航迹预测研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 15 -23 .
[7] 宋铭楷, 朱成杰. 基于H-WOA-GWO和区段修正策略的配电网故障定位研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 24 -37 .
[8] 韩烁, 江林峰, 杨建斌. 基于注意力机制PINNs方法求解圣维南方程[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 58 -68 .
[9] 李志欣, 匡文兰. 结合互注意力空间自适应和特征对集成判别的细粒度图像分类[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 69 -82 .
[10] 石天怡, 南新元, 郭翔羽, 赵濮, 蔡鑫. 基于改进ConvNeXt的苹果叶片病害分类算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(4): 83 -96 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发