基于水资源可持续利用的宁波市慈江健康评估

PDF (PC)

基于水资源可持续利用的宁波市慈江健康评估

Health Assessment of Cijiang River in Ningbo City Based on Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources

基于水资源可持续利用的宁波市慈江健康评估

Health Assessment of Cijiang River in Ningbo City Based on Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources

摘要/Abstract

参考文献

Metrics

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2024031801

广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 216-229.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2024031801

• “生态保护与资源可持续利用”专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

沈伟丽^1,2,3, 刘学应², 陈晓东^1,3*, 邓方方⁴, 王苑苑⁵

1.安徽建筑大学土木工程学院,安徽合肥 230601;
2.浙江水利水电学院建筑与工程学院,浙江杭州 310000;
3.浙江水利水电学院水利与海洋工程研究院,浙江杭州 310000;
4.河北省水利规划设计研究院有限公司,河北石家庄 050021;
5.浙江商业职业技术学院创业学院,浙江杭州 310000

收稿日期:2024-03-18 修回日期:2024-06-13 出版日期:2025-01-05 发布日期:2025-02-07
通讯作者: 陈晓东(1965—),男,浙江金华人,浙江水利水电学院教授。E-mail:963763194@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22006138);浙江省自然科学基金(LZJWY23E090002,LZJWY23E090004)

SHEN Weili^1,2,3, LIU Xueying², CHEN Xiaodong^1,3*, DENG Fangfang⁴, WANG Yuanyuan⁵

1. College of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jiangzhu University, Hefei Anhui 230601, China;
2. Faculty of Architecture and Engineering, Zhejiang Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310000, China;
3. Institute of Water Resources and Marine Engineering, Zhejiang Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310000, China;
4. Hebei Water Resources Planning and Design Institute Co, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050021, China;
5. College of Entrepreneurship, Zhejiang Commercial Vocational and Technical College, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310000, China

Received:2024-03-18 Revised:2024-06-13 Online:2025-01-05 Published:2025-02-07

摘要： 水生态保护与水资源可持续利用是当前经济社会可持续发展的关键因素,有必要及时采取水生态修复措施保证水资源可持续利用和水生态系统的稳定性。本文以慈江为研究对象,针对慈江所处环境及指标相关性,建立包括水文、水质、形态、生物、社会服务、河流管理等6个方面的全方位河湖健康状态评估体系,对慈江进行全面健康评估。结果表明:慈江的健康赋分为77.218分,健康状况为“健康”,得分较低的主要有水质优劣程度、生态缓冲带指数、浮游植物多样性指数,表明慈江主要病害表现在缓冲带较窄、植被覆盖度较低,水质等级较低不满足功能区要求,水质指标波动起伏等。建议定期对慈江水资源健康状态进行评估,加强水资源管理,提高水质、水生物环境及水生态承载能力,增加缓冲带植被覆盖率,可为其他河流水生态健康评估及水资源可持续利用发展提供参考。

关键词: 健康评估, 水资源, 水生态保护, 水生态修复, 慈江

Abstract: Water ecological protection and sustainable utilization of water resources are key factors for the current sustainable development of the economy and society. Therefore, it is necessary to take timely measures for water ecological restoration to ensure the sustainable utilization of water resources and the stability of water ecosystems. This study takes Cijiang River as the research subjects, and establishes a comprehensive river and lake health status assessment system including hydrology, water quality, morphology, biology, social services, and river management, based on the correlation between the environment and indicators of Cijiang River. A comprehensive health assessment of Cijiang River is conducted. The results showed that the health score of Cijiang was 77.218 points, and the health status of Cijiang was rated as “healthy”. The main indicators with lower scores were the degree of water quality, ecological buffer zone index, and phytoplankton diversity index. This indicated that the main diseases of Cijiang were manifested in narrow buffer zones, low vegetation coverage, low water quality grades which can’t meet the requirements of functional zones, and fluctuating water quality indicators. It is recommended to regularly evaluate the health status of water resources, strengthen water resource management, improve water quality, aquatic biological environment, and aquatic ecological carrying capacity, increase vegetation coverage in buffer zones, and hope to provide reference for other river water ecological health assessments and sustainable development of water resources in the future.

Key words: health assessment, water resources, water ecological protection, water environment restoration, Cijiang

中图分类号: X826

沈伟丽, 刘学应, 陈晓东, 邓方方, 王苑苑. 基于水资源可持续利用的宁波市慈江健康评估[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(1): 216-229.

SHEN Weili, LIU Xueying, CHEN Xiaodong, DENG Fangfang, WANG Yuanyuan. Health Assessment of Cijiang River in Ningbo City Based on Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(1): 216-229.

[1] 刘劭婷.河长制下水环境治理的阻滞因素与发展策略:基于公共价值视域的分析[J].人民长江,2024,55(4):51-57. DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2024.04.008.
[2] XU Y, HUO X M, HE S, et al. Ecological network-based food web dynamic model provides an aquatic population restoration strategy[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110735. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110735.
[3] 崔键,彭颖,周阳,等.中国外来入侵水生植物及其在污染水体生态修复中的应用进展[J].植物资源与环境学报,2024,33(1):1-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2024.01.01.
[4] PAN B Z, YUAN J P, ZHANG X H, et al. A review of ecological restoration techniques in fluvial rivers[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2016, 31(2): 110-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.03.001.
[5] 彭军,桂梓玲,岳克栋,等.大型城市浅水湖泊水环境综合治理:以武汉市东湖为例[J].人民长江,2023,54(12):24-33. DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2023.12.004.
[6] 马辰龙.匡河河道水生态治理方案评价研究[D].包头:内蒙古科技大学,2023.
[7] 金宁奔,吕永鹏,谭学军,等.感潮平原中心城区河道近自然生态修复技术的应用[J].环境工程学报,2023,17(8):2789-2796. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.202302077.
[8] WEN C, ZHEN Z, ZHANG L, et al. A bibliometric analysis of river health based on publications in the last three decades[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(6): 15400-15413. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23267-3.
[9] LIU Y, SU H D, ZHANG S H, et al. Update of river health assessment indicator system, weight, and assignment criteria in China[J]. Water Supply, 2021, 21(6): 3153-3167. DOI: 10.2166/ws.2021.087.
[10] SHAN C J, YANG J H, DONG Z C, et al. Study on river health assessment weight calculation[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2020, 29(2): 1839-1848. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/110041.
[11] 刘慧颖,宋刚福,王化儒,等.基于B-IBI的宁夏清水河健康评估[J].环境保护科学,2023,49(2):137-144. DOI: 10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.2022080022.
[12] 曹家乐.基于P-IBI和Z-IBI的滇池水生态健康评价[D].合肥:安徽建筑大学,2023. DOI: 10.27784/d.cnki.gahjz.2023.000212.
[13] 马克迪,董增川,金大伟,等.基于改进的POME模糊综合评价模型的江苏省河流生态健康评价[J].水电能源科学,2021,39(1):67-70,74.
[14] MIN J K, KONG D S. Development of a predictive model for benthic macroinvertebrates by using environmental variables for the biological assessment of Korean streams[J]. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 2021, 36(1): 189-216. DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2021.1958078.
[15] NAIR S M, MUHAMMADALI S A, KOUSHLESH S K, et al. Probing river health status: a study based on index of biotic integrity (IBI) in Tapti River of Deccan plateau, India[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(29): 73185-73201. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-27497-x.
[16] CARAYON D, EULIN-GARRIGUE A, VIGOUROUX R, et al. A new multimetric index for the evaluation of water ecological quality of French Guiana streams based on benthic diatoms[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 113: 106248. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106248.
[17] 耿思敏,李发鹏,王建平.河池市龙江河健康评估[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2020,18(6):508-514. DOI: 10.13244/j.cnki.jiwhr.20190074.
[18] 解莹,张海萍,彭文启,等.永定河上游河流健康评价[J].环境科学与技术,2021,44(S1):319-324. DOI: 10.19672/j.cnki.1003-6504.2021.S1.051.
[19] LI N, WANG H. Analysis on the evaluation of sustainable utilization of water resources by extension evaluation method[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13(16): 813. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-05845-2.
[20] LIU W H, WANG Y Z, HUANG J K, et al. Assessment on the sustainability of water resources utilization in Central Asia based on water resources carrying capacity[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2023, 33(10): 1967-1988. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-023-2161-3.
[21] 中华人民共和国水利部.河湖健康评估技术导则:SL/T 793-2020[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2020.
[22] SURESH K, TANG T, VAN VLIET M T H, et al. Recent advancement in water quality indicators for eutrophication in global freshwater lakes[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2023, 18(6): 063004. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acd071.
[23] 程紫璇,桑国庆,彭涛,等.山东省河流岸线分类及大汶河岸线资源健康评价[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,37(6):678-686. DOI: 10.13349/j.cnki.jdxbn.20230518.001.
[24] 望思强,何勇,陈正兵.河湖岸线保护与利用规划编制关键问题探讨[J].人民长江,2024,55(4):44-50. DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2024.04.007.
[25] 谢钊.太湖大型底栖无脊椎动物群落结构特征及其对环境因子的响应[D].南京:南京农业大学,2014. DOI: 10.7666/d.Y2974169.
[26] 单凯,马红亮,周子俊,等.黄河三门峡库区浮游植物群落结构空间分布特征及多样性[J].人民黄河,2023,45(10):78-83,89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2023.10.014.
[27] 胡闽,傅春,邓俊鹏,等.基于模糊综合评价法的长江岸线资源利用分析[J].人民长江,2021,52(6):42-48. DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2021.06.008.
[28] LIAO D, JIN Y S, ZHANG X. Environmental health risk assessment of urban water sources based on fuzzy set theory[J]. Open Geosciences, 2023, 15(1): 20220565. DOI: 10.1515/geo-2022-0565.
[29] 苏玥.松花江干流佳木斯段河流健康评价体系的构建与应用[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2023. DOI: 10.7666/d.Y4095788.
[30] 李彦平.基于不同评价方法的汾河运城段水质研究[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2024,38(1):100-111. DOI: 10.16207/j.cnki.1009-4490.2024.01.014.
[31] ZHANG S H, FAN W W, YI Y J, et al. Evaluation method for regional water cycle health based on nature-society water cycle theory[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 551: 352-364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.013.
[32] ZHONG M, JIANG T, LI K, et al. Integration of fuzzy theory and multi-hierarchy comprehensive index system for health assessment of water environmental ecosystem[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2018, 125: 164-170. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2018.22779.
[33] 程元庚,李福林,范明元,等.基于组合赋权和改进物元可拓模型的泗河生态系统健康评估[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,35(3):230-238. DOI: 10.13349/j.cnki.jdxbn.20201221.001.
[34] 周子俊,单凯,娄广艳,等.新形势下黄河健康评估指标体系研究[J].人民黄河,2021,43(8):79-83,129. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2021.08.015.
[35] 毛智宇,徐力刚,赖锡军,等.基于综合指标法的鄱阳湖生态系统健康评价[J].湖泊科学,2023,35(3):1022-1032. DOI: 10.18307/2023.0321.
[36] 曹家乐,张亚辉,张瑾,等.国内外水生态健康评价研究进展[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(5):1402-1410. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210425.

Viewed

Full text

From	Others	local

Times	28	13
Rate	68%	32%

Abstract

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	46

From	Others	local

Times	43	3
Rate	93%	7%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

Discussed

Just accepted

Online first

Just accepted

Online first

[1]	莫崇勋, 农颂, 唐玲玲, 黄奕, 黎禹功, 朱翰林. 基于组合赋权可拓物元评价模型的玉林市水资源承载力评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(1): 230-241.
[2]	潘晓东, 尹学灵, 唐建生, 苏春田, 孟小军. 寨底地下河系统脆弱性评价指标体系及方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 32(2): 168-174.