Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 225-244.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2026011501

• Ecology and Environmental Science Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tourism-driven evolution and spatial control of ecosystem services in karst scenic areas: a case study of Yulong River, Guilin, China

Geng Haixuan1, Ma Yanmei1, Pan Xuelan1, Jiang Yu1,2*   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Restoration in Ecologically Fragile Areas(Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China
  • Received:2026-01-15 Revised:2026-02-27 Online:2026-11-05 Published:2026-11-10

Abstract: This study establishes a scientific assessment framework, diagnostic methodology, and management pathways for the ecological conservation and sustainable development of karst tourism destinations, offering valuable insights for coordinating tourism development and ecological preservation in environmentally fragile regions. Taking the Yulong River Karst Wetland Scenic Area in Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China as a case study, this paper systematically evaluates the spatio-temporal evolution of three key ecosystem services-water conservation, habitat quality, and carbon storage-from 2003 to 2023 using the InVEST model. The findings indicate that, driven by tourism-induced land-use changes, the scenic area’s ecosystem services have generally degraded. This is reflected in the continuous decline of water conservation capacity, polarized habitat quality, and a stepwise reduction in carbon storage, collectively forming a spatial differentiation pattern characterized by "high-value preservation in the upper reaches, median-value expansion in the middle reaches, and low-value aggregation in the lower reaches". The study further reveals that tourism activities drive land use change through three primary pathways: facility expansion, agricultural transformation, and operational emissions, which subsequently trigger coordinated degradation of ecosystem services. Based on the evaluation results and spatial coupling patterns, this paper proposes a three-tier spatial management system-comprising core conservation areas, ecological restoration zones, and intensive utilization areas-along with ecologically tailored optimization measures such as terraced wetlands, permeable pavements, and native vegetation restoration. These recommendations provide a scientific basis and practical reference for advancing ecological protection and sustainable development in karst tourist destinations.

Key words: ecosystem services, karst scenic areas, InVEST model, tourism-driven, spatial control, Yulong River

CLC Number:  X171.1;F205
[1] Helliwell D R. Valuation of wildlife resources[J]. Regional Studies, 1969, 3(1): 41-47. DOI: 10.1080/09595236900185051.
[2] Westman W E. How much are nature′s services worth?[J]. Science, 1977, 197(4307): 960-964.
[3] Ehrlich P, Ehrlich A. Extinction:the causes and consequences of tne disappearance of species[J]. Bioscience, 1982, 53(4): 254-255.
[4] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[5] 傅伯杰,于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J]. 资源科学,2016,38(1):1-9.
[6] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J]. 地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[7] 向“新”而行,以“质”致远:广西阳朔遇龙河国家级旅游度假区“全域新治”的启示[N]. 光明日报, 2024-05-22(05).
[8] 卢昕. 国家体育旅游示范基地发展路径研究: 以桂林阳朔遇龙河休闲体育旅游度假区为个案[D]. 南宁: 广西民族大学, 2023.
[9] 张昌顺, 范娜, 刘春兰, 等. 1990—2018年中国生态系统水源涵养功能时空格局与演变[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(13): 5536-5545. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202107191937.
[10]张凯琪. 桂林市典型生态系统服务功能可持续研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2023.
[11]陈乐, 卫伟. 西北旱区典型流域土地利用与生境质量的时空演变特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1909-1918. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.09.022.
[12]邓楚雄, 郭方圆, 黄栋良, 等. 基于INVEST模型的洞庭湖区土地利用景观格局对生境质量的影响研究[J]. 生态科学, 2021, 40(2): 99-109. DOI:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2021.02.013.
[13]尚俊, 蔡海生, 龙月, 等. 基于InVEST模型的鄱阳湖区生境质量时空演化及其变迁特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(8): 1901-1915. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202108012.
[14]陈艳, 吴睿, 马月伟, 等. 典型喀斯特地区生境质量的时空分异与模拟研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(12): 1593-1603. DOI:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0786.
[15]黄晓东, 刘文锴, 曹润祥, 等. 不透水面扩张对郑州主城区降水特征的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2022, 38(6): 22-30. DOI:10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2022.06.004.
[16]胡露瑶, 代俊峰, 郑文俊, 等. 基于InVEST模型的漓江流域景观格局及生境质量时空演变分析[J]. 广西科学, 2024, 31(6): 1156-1167. DOI:10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20241207.010.
[17]黄韬, 刘素红. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的福建省土地利用变化与碳储量评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(2): 246-257. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.013.
[18]He Y L, Ma J M, Zhang C S, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and prediction of carbon storage in Guilin based on FLUS and InVEST models[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(5): 1445. DOI: 10.3390/rs15051445.
[19]韦振锋, 李集香, 黄群英. 2010—2020年桂林市生态系统碳储量演化及土地利用的驱动影响[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2024, 37(1): 39-50.
[20]李惠滨. 漓江风景名胜区生态敏感性时空演变及驱动力分析[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2025.
[21]庞丽恒. 退耕还竹对西南喀斯特山区土壤固碳持水的影响研究与潜力分析: 以四川省长宁县为例[D]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2025.
[22]广西壮族自治区林业局. 关于桂林漓江风景名胜区遇龙河景区详细规划的公示[EB/OL]. (2023-11-29)[2025-08-10]. http://lyj.gxzf.gov.cn/zfxxgkzl/fdzdgknr/gggs/t17010990.shtml.
[23]邱继勤. 试论旅游农业发展现状及对策研究: 以重庆市为例[J]. 生产力研究, 2009(2): 98-99, 113. DOI:10.19374/j.cnki.14-1145/f.2009.02.035.
[24]彭建, 徐飞雄, 吴见, 等. 典型旅游城市生境质量空间分异及其影响机理研究: 以黄山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(10): 2397-2409. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201910012.
[25]胡伟, 张云伟, 刘晶, 等. 土壤压实胁迫对烟草前期生长的影响初报[J]. 热带作物学报, 2013, 34(2): 249-253.
[26]谭佳欣, 王凯. 旅游生态系统发展空间关联网络与土地利用转型的权衡协同关系: 以武陵山片区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(4): 1563-1574. DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202405281239.
[27]单立先,田潇然,林嘉暄.“三生空间”视角下旅游地碳储量时空演变及其驱动机制:以丽江市为例[J]. 环境科学,2026,47(4):2549-2560.DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202502251.
[28]郭佳晖, 刘晓煌, 李洪宇, 等. 2000—2030年云贵高原碳储量和生境质量时空格局演变[J]. 地质通报, 2024, 43(9): 1485-1497. DOI:10.12097/gbc.2023.11.016.
[29]夏铭浩. 基于雨水利用的西安市商业综合体屋顶设计策略研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2024.
[30]彭正耀, 宋维峰, 夏欣. 元阳哈尼梯田湿地土壤铵态氮吸附-解吸特征[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(5): 651-663. DOI:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2024.05.004.
[31]李敏, 张迎颖, 王岩, 等. 不同强化处理措施生态沟渠的净化效果对比分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2025, 41(3): 526-536. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.03.012.
[32]刘海亚, 吴昌洲, 林昌勇, 等. 农田氮磷生态拦截沟渠系统中植物配置建议: 以温州地区生态沟渠的做法为例[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2025, 66(4): 1030-1035. DOI:10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20240671.
[33]马志影. 基于雨水滞留效应的校园屋顶景观设计研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2023.
[34]任媛媛. 基于透水混凝土铺装材料抗冻胀性能试验探析[J]. 东北水利水电, 2025, 43(5): 22-25, 46, 72. DOI:10.14124/j.cnki.dbslsd22-1097.2025.05.004.
[35]韩念龙, 张镇林, 高浩嘉, 等. 基于自组织映射神经网络的东江流域生态服务簇识别与功能分区[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 289-297. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.02.012.
[36]谭莹莹, 蒋瑜, 周绍齐. 旅游城市生态系统服务价值的时空演变: 以桂林市为例[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(1): 133-149. DOI:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2024042202.
[37]蓝天, 丁金华. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的水网地区生态安全格局构建: 以澄湖片区为例[J]. 小城镇建设, 2026, 44(2): 38-46.
[38]曹恩桓, 蒋政权, 罗云超. 张掖国家湿地公园碳固存与生态系统服务权衡关系及驱动因子[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2025, 21(4): 23-30. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2025.04.04.
[39]张小琼, 杨自强. 全域旅游视角下海岛生态旅游开发路径研究: 以广东省湛江市南三岛为例[J]. 商展经济, 2024(7): 48-51. DOI:10.19995/j.cnki.CN10-1617/F7.2024.07.048.
[40]平洪柳. 生态旅游视角下贵州森林资源的保护与利用[J]. 现代园艺, 2022, 45(12): 181-183. DOI:10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2022.12.045.
[41]容科彪, 周映. 阳朔:打造遇龙河“生态会客厅”[N]. 广西日报, 2015-03-03(2).
[42]杨良健, 章锦河, 薛华菊, 等. 三江源国家公园生态风险与生态系统健康对生态系统文化服务的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2026, 46(10):5119-5132.
[43]黄进, 郭晓燚, 田野. 长江经济带人类活动对生态系统服务的影响: 基于空间—经济—能源视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2026, 35(1): 142-155.
[44]胡佳蓬. 基于生态系统论的生态旅游规划分析: 以洱源“一河三湖”片区湿地保护建设及旅游开发规划为例[J]. 中外建筑, 2020(8): 104-108. DOI: 10.19940/j.cnki.1008-0422.2020.08.027.
[45]俞月凤, 何铁光, 蒙炎成, 等. 广西岩溶区大化县生态环境脆弱性评价[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2015, 2(4): 1-6.
[46]胡兆鑫, 罗为群, 蒋忠诚, 等. 基于生态系统脆弱性评价的典型岩溶区生态治理分区[J]. 中国岩溶, 2024, 43(3): 661-671, 703.
[47]郭婷婷, 丁洪伟, 张浩, 等. 中国西南喀斯特地区生态系统服务权衡/协同研究及展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(6): 1384-1398.
[48]何继业, 梁玉莲, 区富有, 等. 基于InVEST模型的广西生境质量时空变化研究[J]. 广西科学, 2025, 32(2): 362-373. DOI:10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20250305.001.
[49]周灵慧. 桂林市未来土地利用模拟及碳储量预测研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林电子科技大学, 2024.
[50]周馨冉. 基于LUCC的漓江流域碳储量时空变化与模拟预测[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2024.
[1] JIA Yanhong, HUANG Junzhong, WU Chunzhu, HU Hongwen. Multi-scenario Ecosystem Service Assessment of Lijiang River Basin Based on PLUS-InVEST Model [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(3): 156-169.
[2] JIN Run, HE Li, LUO Fang, HE Zhengwei, LI Dan, LIN Zhiyu, HUANG Yuna. Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Habitat Quality in Fujian Province, 2000-2020 [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(3): 170-182.
[3] TAN Yingying, JIANG Yu, ZHOU Shaoqi. Spatio-temporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in Tourist Cities: Taking Guilin City as an Example [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(1): 133-149.
[4] XIE Ling, CHEN Zhantu, JIANG Yu, XIAO Xiaohui, JIA Yanhong. Habitat Quality Changes and Influencing Factors in Huixian Wetland Based on InVEST&GEO-detectors Model [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(5): 180-190.
[5] GAO Hongjuan, HAN Huiqing, LUO Xuqiang, LI Jinyan, CHEN Mengling, ZHANG Xinding. Effects of Land Use Change on Freshwater Ecosystem Services in Guizhou, China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(1): 157-163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!