广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1-12.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2024100902

• 物理与电子工程 •    下一篇

站点周边用地类型对地铁乘车满意度影响研究

刘晓娟1, 林璐2, 胡郁葱2*, 潘雷1,3   

  1. 1.广州市交通运输研究院有限公司,广东 广州 510627;
    2.华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510641;
    3.广州大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-09 修回日期:2025-01-05 发布日期:2025-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 胡郁葱(1970—),女,湖北武汉人,华南理工大学副教授,博士。E-mail: ychu@scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(52072128);广州市科技计划项目(202206010056)

Research on the Influence of Land Use Types Surrounding Stations on Subway Passenger Satisfaction

LIU Xiaojuan1, LIN Lu 2, HU Yucong2*, PAN Lei1,3   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Transportation Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Guangdong 510627, China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510641, China;
    3. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2024-10-09 Revised:2025-01-05 Published:2025-11-19

PDF (PC)

1

摘要： 为研究地铁站点周边用地类型对乘客满意度的影响,以广州地铁4号线为例,站点周边用地类型为自变量,乘客满意度为因变量,受访者年龄、性别、受教育程度、职业为协变量,使用倾向得分匹配法进行分析,建立基于反事实框架的乘客满意度主因素效应模型,计算和匹配倾向得分,并进行均衡性检验。结果表明:匹配后各协变量的标准差均小于10%,倾向得分匹配法能够消除协变量的影响,较好地刻画用地类型对地铁乘车满意度的影响;除工业用地对乘车满意度有负向影响外,其余用地类型均为正向影响,其中农业用地的满意度平均处理效应值最大;可以采用完善站点周边用地功能、加强站点与周边用地的联系、有针对性地优化环境设施等手段提升地铁乘车满意度水平。

关键词: 交通工程, 轨道交通, 倾向性得分匹配, 用地类型, 乘客满意度

Abstract: To study the impact of land use types surrounding subway stations on passenger satisfaction, this research takes Guangzhou Metro Line 4 as a case. With the land use types around the stations as the independent variable and passenger satisfaction as the dependent variable, while considering the age, gender, education level, and occupation of respondents as covariates, the study employs Propensity Score Matching(PSM) for analysis. A main factor effect model for passenger satisfaction based on a counterfactual framework is established to calculate and match propensity scores, followed by a balance test to ensure the robustness of the findings. The results indicate that after matching, the standard deviations of all covariates are less than 10%, suggesting that the PSM method effectively eliminates the influence of these covariates. It provides a good representation of the impact of land use types on subway passenger satisfaction. Specifically, except for industrial land, which has a negative effect on passenger satisfaction, all other land use types exhibit positive effects. Among them, agricultural land has the largest average treatment effect on satisfaction. To enhance subway passenger satisfaction, measures such as improving the land use functions around stations, strengthening the connection between stations and surrounding lands, and targetedly optimizing environmental facilities can be adopted.

Key words: traffic engineering, rail transit, propensity score matching, land use type, passenger satisfaction

中图分类号:  U293.6

[1] STUART K R, MEDNICK M, BOCKMAN J. Structural equation model of customer satisfaction for the New York City subway system[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000, 1735(1): 133-137. DOI: 10.3141/1735-16.
[2] 陈坚, 唐炜, 蔡晓禹, 等. 城市轨道交通乘客满意度多群组结构方程模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(1): 173-178, 244. DOI: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2018.01.026.
[3] 刘建荣, 曹江昱. 基于Rasch模型的公交服务质量研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2019, 43(2): 208-212. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.2095-3844.2019.02.006.
[4] NWACHUKWU A A. Assessment of passenger satisfaction with intra-city public bus transport services in Abuja, Nigeria[J]. Journal of Public Transportation, 2014, 17(1): 99-119. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.17.1.5.
[5] HECKMAN J J. Selection bias[M] //Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005: 463-468. DOI: 10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00115-8.
[6] MCDONALD R J, MCDONALD J S, BIDA J P, et al. Intravenous contrast material-induced nephropathy: causal or coincident phenomenon?[J]. Radiology, 2013, 267(1): 106-118. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121823.
[7] BUTLER K. Intravenous contrast material exposure is not an independent risk factor for dialysis or mortality[J]. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2015, 48(4): 522-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.029.
[8] HINSON J S, EHMANN M R, FINE D M, et al. Risk of acute kidney injury after intravenous contrast media administration[J]. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 69(5): 577-586. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.021.
[9] 葛成志, 徐金菊, 陈志超, 等. 免费用药对天长市高血压患者随访效果的影响: 基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的实证分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(4): 392-398.
[10] 付娟, 黎秀妍. 随迁与留守对农村青少年非认知能力的影响: 基于倾向得分匹配法的实证分析[J]. 兵团教育学院学报, 2024, 34(3): 50-59.
[11] 毛太田, 汤淦, 陈进亮. 政府数据开放平台建设对促进数字政府发展效果的影响: 基于PSM模型的计量分析[J]. 科技情报研究, 2024, 6(2): 30-41. DOI: 10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2024.02.004.
[12] ELLISON R B, ELLISON A B, GREAVES S P, et al. Electronic ticketing systems as a mechanism for travel behaviour change? Evidence from Sydney’s Opal card[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 99: 80-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.004.
[13] PERDOMO J A. A methodological proposal to estimate changes of residential property value: case study developed in Bogotá[J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2011, 18(16): 1577-1581. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2011.554360.
[14] HU Y C, CAO J Y, LIU J R. Influence of bus stop land use characteristics on passenger waiting time satisfaction: a case study in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 96: 103206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103206.
[15] BECKER S O, ICHINO A. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores[J]. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 2002, 2(4): 358-377. DOI: 10.1177/1536867x0200200403.
[16] STUART E A. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward[J]. Statistical Science, 2010, 25(1): 1-21. DOI: 10.1214/09-STS313.
[17] MYUNG I J. Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2003, 47(1): 90-100. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7.
[18] ABADIE A, DRUKKER D, HERR J L, et al. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in stata[J]. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 2004, 4(3): 290-311.
[19] BASER O. Too much ado about propensity score models? comparing methods of propensity score matching[J]. Value in Health, 2006, 9(6): 377-385. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00130.x.
[20] HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65(2): 261-294. DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00044.
[21] STEINER P M. Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications[J]. Psychometrika, 2010, 75(4): 775-777. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-010-9170-8.
[22] HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P E. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1997, 64(4): 605-654. DOI: 10.2307/2971733.
[23] EPANECHNIKOV V A. Non-parametric estimation of a multidimensional probability density[J]. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 1969, 14(1):156-161.
[24] ZHANG Z H, KIM H J, LONJON G, et al. Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching[J]. Annals of Translational Medicine, 2019, 7(1): 16. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.12.10.
[25] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准: GB 50137—2011[S/OL]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011:1-28[2025-01-08].http://www.zichuan.gov.cn/oldatt/Uploads/0158/20171121151145468.pdf.
[26] 周长城, 王妙. 十八大以来我国农民主观生活质量变化及影响因素研究: 基于CSS2013和CSS2019数据的实证分析[J]. 宏观质量研究, 2022, 10(2): 1-14. DOI: 10.13948/j.cnki.hgzlyj.2022.02.001.
[1] 陈秀锋, 王成鑫, 赵凤阳, 杨凯, 谷可鑫. 改进DQN算法的单点交叉口信号控制方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 42(6): 81-88.
[2] 张伟健, 邴其春, 沈富鑫, 胡嫣然, 高鹏. 城市快速路路段行程时间估计方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 41(2): 49-57.
[3] 许凯, 田晟, 朱泽坤. 短时事件下的地铁乘客路径选择行为研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 37(2): 9-14.
[4] 邝先验, 吴赟, 曹韦华, 吴银凤. 城市混合非机动车流的元胞自动机仿真模型[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 33(1): 7-14.
[5] 陈思溢, 罗强, 黄辉先. 基于群决策理论的协调控制子区划分方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 32(4): 18-25.
[6] 许伦辉, 廖燃火昆. 基于车流轨迹的交叉口相位相序优化[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 28(3): 5-9.
[7] 许伦辉, 罗强, 傅惠. 基于前车制动过程的车辆跟驰安全距离模型[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 28(1): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 韩华彬, 高丙朋, 蔡鑫, 孙凯. 基于HO-CNN-BiLSTM-Transformer模型的风机叶片结冰故障诊断[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 13 -28 .
[2] 陈建国, 梁恩华, 宋学伟, 覃章荣. 基于OCT图像三维重建的人眼房水动力学LBM模拟[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 29 -41 .
[3] 李好, 何冰. 凹槽结构表面液滴弹跳行为研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 42 -53 .
[4] 凌福, 张永刚, 闻炳海. 基于插值的多相流格子Boltzmann方法曲线边界算法研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 54 -68 .
[5] 解盛, 马海菲, 张灿龙, 王智文, 韦春荣. 基于多分辨率特征定位的跨模态行人检索方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 69 -79 .
[6] 魏梓书, 陈志刚, 王衍学, 哈斯铁尔·马德提汗. 基于SBSI-YOLO11的轻量化轴承外观缺陷检测算法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 80 -91 .
[7] 易见兵, 胡雅怡, 曹锋, 李俊, 彭鑫, 陈鑫. 融合动态通道剪枝的轻量级CT图像肺结节检测网络设计[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 92 -106 .
[8] 卢梦筱, 张阳春, 章晓峰. 基于分布式强化学习方法解决后继特征中的低估问题[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 107 -119 .
[9] 姜云卢, 卢辉杰, 黄晓雯. 惩罚加权复合分位数回归方法在固定效应面板数据中的应用研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 120 -127 .
[10] 邓金娜, 刘秋梅, 陈一鸣, 杨爱民. 两种黏弹性运动板的数值模拟与稳定性分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 43(6): 128 -139 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发