Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 195-209.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2025070805

• Agricultural Science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Differences in microbial community structure and function between limestone soils and red soils in Northern Guangxi, China

Wang Ruru1,2,3, Yan Xiangting1,2,3, Liu Zongbao2,4,5, Chen Rongshu1,2,3*, Zhu Jing1,2,3   

  1. 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    3. College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    4. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    5. College of Life Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China
  • Received:2025-07-08 Revised:2025-10-20 Online:2026-07-05 Published:2026-07-01

Abstract: To elucidate the characteristics of microbial diversity in different forest soil types within the subtropical monsoon region, this study investigated O/A (0~10 cm) and AB (10~30 cm) horizons of limestone soils (LS) and red soils (RS) under forest vegetation in Northern Guangxi. Combining 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing with soil physicochemical property analysis differences in microbial community structure, functional potential, and co-occurrence networks between soil types and horizons are explored. The results showed that: 1) Both soil types were dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria. Compared with limestone soils, RS exhibited higher relative abundance of Acidobacteria. Archaeal communities were predominantly Thaumarchaeota (>76%) in both soils. 2) Bacterial and archaeal richness indices were higher in limestone soils and red soils, respectively, though overall alpha diversity showed no significant difference. The O/A horizon displayed higher bacterial richness and diversity than the AB horizon, whereas archaeal richness was greater in the AB horizon. 3) Limestone soils bacterial and archaeal networks exhibited higher modularity and information transfer efficiency, while red soils networks demonstrated enhanced node complexity and robustness, reflecting adaptive mechanisms to acidic environments. 4) Soil pH, organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphorus (AP) indirectly regulated microbial functional divergence by modulating resource availability. 5) Limestone soils bacteria showed stronger carbon-nitrogen metabolic functions (e.g., nitrification, aromatic compound degradation), whereas red soils bacteria exhibited enhanced nitrogen fixation capacity. Archaeal functional prediction revealed significantly higher aerobic ammonia oxidation activity in limestone soils and greater methanogenic potential in AB horizons of both soils.

Key words: limestone soil, red soil, microbial community structure, functional prediction, co-occurrence networks, niche differentiation, Northern Guangxi, China

CLC Number:  S154.36
[1] Saccá M L, Barra Caracciolo A, Di Lenola M, et al. Ecosystem services provided by soil microorganisms[M]//Soil Biological Communities and Ecosystem Resilience. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 9-24. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63336-7_2.
[2] Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio A M, Brewer T E, et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6373): 320-325. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9516.
[3] Philippot L, Chenu C, Kappler A, et al. The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2024, 22(4): 226-239. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-023-00980-5.
[4] Karimi B, Terrat S, Dequiedt S, et al. Biogeography of soil bacteria and archaea across France[J]. Science Advances, 2018, 4(7): eaat1808. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1808.
[5] Griffiths R I, Thomson B C, Plassart P, et al. Mapping and validating predictions of soil bacterial biodiversity using European and national scale datasets[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 97: 61-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.018.
[6] Kemmitt S, Wright D, Goulding K, et al. pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(5): 898-911. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.006.
[7] Zhang J, Wang P C, Tian H M, et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil microbial community structure and analysis of soil properties with vegetable planted at different years under greenhouse conditions[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 187: 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2018.11.008.
[8] Griffiths R I, Thomson B C, James P, et al. The bacterial biogeography of British soils[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 13(6): 1642-1654. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02480.x.
[9] Zhou X, Tahvanainen T, Malard L, et al. Global analysis of soil bacterial genera and diversity in response to pH[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 198: 109552. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109552.
[10] Fierer N, Bradford M A, Jackson R B. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88(6): 1354-1364. DOI: 10.1890/05-1839.
[11] De Menezes A B, Prendergast-Miller M T, Poonpatana P, et al. C/N ratio drives soil actinobacterial cellobiohydrolase gene diversity[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 81(9): 3016-3028. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00067-15.
[12] Baker B J, De Anda V, Seitz K W, et al. Diversity, ecology and evolution of archaea[J]. Nature Microbiology, 2020, 5(7): 887-900. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0715-z.
[13] Rampelotto P H. Extremophiles and extreme environments[J]. Life, 2013, 3(3): 482-485. DOI: 10.3390/life3030482.
[14] Zou D Y, Qi Y L, Zhou J J, et al. Unveiling the life of archaea in sediments: diversity, metabolic potentials, and ecological roles[J]. iMetaOmics, 2025, 2(1): e56. DOI: 10.1002/imo2.56.
[15] Kemnitz D, Kolb S, Conrad R. High abundance of Crenarchaeota in a temperate acidic forest soil[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2007, 60(3): 442-448. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00310.x.
[16] Pesaro M, Widmer F. Identification of novel Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota clusters associated with different depth layers of a forest soil[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2002, 42(1): 89-98. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6496(02)00302-1.
[17] Bahram M, Hildebrand F, Forslund S K, et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome[J]. Nature, 2018, 560(7717): 233-237. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6.
[18] Wei G S, Li M C, Shi W C, et al. Similar drivers but different effects lead to distinct ecological patterns of soil bacterial and archaeal communities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 144: 107759. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107759.
[19] Ma B, Dai Z M, Wang H Z, et al. Distinct biogeographic patterns for archaea, bacteria, and fungi along the vegetation gradient at the continental scale in Eastern China[J]. mSystems, 2017, 2(1): e00174-e00116. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00174-16.
[20] Guseva K, Darcy S, Simon E, et al. From diversity to complexity: microbial networks in soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 169: 108604. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108604.
[21] Li K, Xing X Y, Wang S B, et al. Organic fertilisation enhances network complexity among bacteria, fungi, and protists by improving organic matter and phosphorus in acidic agricultural soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2024, 122: 103649. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103649.
[22] Shi J W, Yang L, Liao Y, et al. Soil labile organic carbon fractions mediate microbial community assembly processes during long-term vegetation succession in a semiarid region[J]. iMeta, 2023, 2(4): e142. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.142.
[23] Fan K K, Weisenhorn P, Gilbert J A, et al. Soil pH correlates with the co-occurrence and assemblage process of diazotrophic communities in rhizosphere and bulk soils of wheat fields[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 121: 185-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.017.
[24] Duan Y L, Zhang J B, Petropoulos E, et al. Soil acidification destabilizes terrestrial ecosystems via decoupling soil microbiome[J]. Global Change Biology, 2025, 31(4): e70174. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70174.
[25] 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 杜虎, 等. 中国西南喀斯特石漠化时空演变特征、发生机制与调控对策[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(18): 5328-5341. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201405090929.
[26] 王智慧, 蒋先军. 紫色土中微生物群落结构及功能特征对土壤pH的差异响应[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(7): 3876-3883. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202111055.
[27] Ma X M, Zhou Z, Chen J, et al. Long-term nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization reveals that phosphorus limitation shapes the microbial community composition and functions in tropical montane forest soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 854: 158709. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158709.
[28] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[29] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000.
[30] 吴雨纯, 秦明森, 肖海钰, 等. 嘉陵江干流微塑料附着微生物的群落构建机制[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2025, 31(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2024.06006.
[31] Louca S, Parfrey L W, Doebeli M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome[J]. Science, 2016, 353(6305): 1272-1277. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf4507.
[32] 刘瑛涵, 任伟征, 赵璐峰, 等. 稻鱼共生系统土壤微生物群落组成和功能特征[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2024, 45(6): 865-877. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406032.
[33] Li H, Yang S, Semenov M V, et al. Temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition is linked with a K-selected microbial community[J]. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(12): 2763-2779. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15593.
[34] Chen Y J, Neilson J W, Kushwaha P, et al. Life-history strategies of soil microbial communities in an arid ecosystem[J]. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15(3): 649-657. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-00803-y.
[35] Shao P S, Lynch L, Xie H T, et al. Tradeoffs among microbial life history strategies influence the fate of microbial residues in subtropical forest soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 153: 108112. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108112.
[36] 刘开朗, 王加启, 卜登攀, 等. 环境微生物群落结构与功能多样性研究方法[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(4): 1074-1080. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.2010.04.029.
[37] Li X, Zhang Y, Song S M, et al. Bacterial diversity patterns differ in different patch types of mixed forests in the upstream area of the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 161: 103868. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103868.
[38] 马姣娇, 高常军, 易小青, 等. 广东海丰湿地生态恢复进程中不同生境的土壤微生物特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(5): 2908-2917. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202205179.
[39] 李敏, 郝伟. 大兴安岭4个树种根围土壤细菌群落结构[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 2057-2066. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202107.008.
[40] Yuan Y L, Si G C, Wang J, et al. Bacterial community in alpine grasslands along an altitudinal gradient on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2014, 87(1): 121-132. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12197.
[41] 郭城. 石漠化地区不同植被恢复模式下土壤微生物群落结构研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2021.
[42] 段昌海, 张翠景, 孙艺华, 等. 新型产甲烷古菌研究进展[J]. 微生物学报, 2019, 59(6): 981-995. DOI: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20180435.
[43] Wang Y Q, Shahbaz M, Zhran M, et al. Microbial resource limitation in aggregates in karst and non-karst soils[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(8): 1591. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11081591.
[44] Xu Z W, Yu G R, Zhang X Y, et al. Biogeographical patterns of soil microbial community as influenced by soil characteristics and climate across Chinese forest biomes[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2018, 124: 298-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.019.
[45] Jeanbille M, BuÉE M, Bach C, et al. Soil parameters drive the structure, diversity and metabolic potentials of the bacterial communities across temperate beech forest soil sequences[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2016, 71(2): 482-493. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-015-0669-5.
[46] Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, et al. Bacterial, archaeal and fungal succession in the forefield of a receding glacier[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2012, 63(3): 552-564. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8.
[47] Liang Y T, Xiao X, Nuccio E E, et al. Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 22(4): 1327-1340. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14945.
[48] Lei M T, Li Y, Zhang W L, et al. Identifying ecological processes driving vertical and horizontal archaeal community assemblages in a contaminated urban river[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 245: 125615. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125615.
[49] Chaban B, Ng S Y M, Jarrell K F. Archaeal habitats: from the extreme to the ordinary[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2006, 52(2): 73-116. DOI: 10.1139/w05-147.
[50] Ma B, Wang H Z, Dsouza M, et al. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in Eastern China[J]. The ISME Journal, 2016, 10(8): 1891-1901. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.261.
[51] Mallick S, Das S. Acid-tolerant bacteria and prospects in industrial and environmental applications[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2023, 107(11): 3355-3374. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-023-12529-w.
[52] Li W T, Liu Q H, Xie L L, et al. Interspecific plant-plant interactions increase the soil microbial network stability, shift keystone microbial taxa, and enhance their functions in mixed stands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 533: 120851. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120851.
[53] Creamer R E, Hannula S E, Van Leeuwen J P, et al. Ecological network analysis reveals the inter-connection between soil biodiversity and ecosystem function as affected by land use across Europe[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 97: 112-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.006.
[54] Zarafshar M, Vincent G, Korboulewsky N, et al. The impact of stand composition and tree density on topsoil characteristics and soil microbial activities[J]. Catena, 2024, 234: 107541. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107541.
[55] 刘红梅, 李睿颖, 高晶晶, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤团聚体及微生物学特性的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(6): 1277-1284. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.06.025.
[56] Han S, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Luo X S, et al. Soil aggregate size-dependent relationships between microbial functional diversity and multifunctionality[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 154: 108143. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108143.
[57] Kitano H. Biological robustness[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2004, 5(11): 826-837. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1471.
[58] Li W, Luo M M, Shi R, et al. Variations in bacterial and archaeal community structure and diversity along the soil profiles of a peatland in Southwest China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(2): 2276-2286. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15774-6.
[59] Cheng X Y, Yun Y, Wang H M, et al. Contrasting bacterial communities and their assembly processes in karst soils under different land use[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 751: 142263. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142263.
[60] Fazi S, Amalfitano S, Pernthaler J, et al. Bacterial communities associated with benthic organic matter in headwater stream microhabitats[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 7(10): 1633-1640. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00857.x.
[61] Cheng Y, Zhang H M, Chen Z X, et al. Contrasting effects of different pH-raising materials on N2O emissions in acidic upland soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 72(1): 432-445. DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12964.
[62] Rondon M A, Lehmann J, RamÍRez J, et al. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2007, 43(6): 699-708. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z.
[63] Di H J, Cameron K C, Shen J P, et al. Nitrification driven by bacteria and not archaea in nitrogen-rich grassland soils[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2009, 2(9): 621-624. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo613.
[64] Prosser J I, Nicol G W. Archaeal and bacterial ammonia-oxidisers in soil: the quest for niche specialisation and differentiation[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2012, 20(11): 523-531. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.08.001.
[65] Nicol G W, Leininger S, Schleper C, et al. The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing Archaea and bacteria[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 10(11): 2966-2978. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01701.x.
[66] 李煜珊, 李耀明, 欧阳志云. 产甲烷微生物研究概况[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(5): 2025-2030. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2014.05.056.
[67] Xiao Y M, Wang J, Wang B, et al. Soil microbial network complexity predicts soil multifunctionality better than soil microbial diversity during grassland-farmland-shrubland conversion on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2025, 379: 109356. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2024.109356.
[68] 刘坤和, 薛玉琴, 竹兰萍, 等. 嘉陵江滨岸带不同土地利用类型对土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(3): 1620-1629. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202106174.
[69] Langille M G I, Zaneveld J, Caporaso J G, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(9): 814-821. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2676.
[70] Sansupa C, Wahdan S F M, Hossen S, et al. Can we use functional annotation of prokaryotic taxa (FAPROTAX) to assign the ecological functions of soil bacteria?[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(2): 688. DOI: 10.3390/app11020688.
[1] PANG Lizhen, DU Lina, WANG Bo. Study on Intestinal Microorganisms of Three Freshwater Snails in Lijiang River [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(5): 207-217.
[2] PENG Suqin, LIU Yulin, MAO Rong, LIU Yuqiu, FAN Yixuan, ZHOU Yushan, YANG Qi. Dynamic Effects of Pinus massoniana Replanted with Broad-leaved Trees of Schima superb on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(1): 150-160.
[3] XIE Qiuli,TANG Yujuan, SU Houren, LI Guangwei, LI Liangbo,WEI Jiguang, HUANG Rongshao. Variation Microbial Biomass and Enzyme Activities in the RhizosphereSoil of the Different Plant Ages of Panax notoginseng [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 35(3): 149-156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] TIAN Sheng, ZHAO Kailong, MIAO Jialin. Research on Automatic Driving Road Traffic Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLO11n Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(1): 1 -9 .
[2] Tang Chenghua, Yi Jianbing, Wu Xin, Xiong Wenwu, Wang Jingyong. A review of cross-domain few-shot image semantic segmentation methods[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 1 -27 .
[3] Tian Sheng, Xie Hualin, Chen Dong. Energy management strategy for fuel cell vehicles based on improved deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 28 -45 .
[4] Zhang Xu, Liu Didi. Intelligent charging/discharging scheduling strategy for electric vehicles based on TD3 algorithm[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 46 -55 .
[5] Yan Yuanyang, Xie Lirong, Zhang Longjun, Ren Juan, Huang Chenchen, Hu Chao. Ultra-short-term wind power prediction model based on multi-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 56 -70 .
[6] Tao Zhenzhuo, Wei Duqu. Adaptive chaos synchronization of PMSM with unknown parameters[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 71 -78 .
[7] Wang Chenglong, Song Qiang, Li Wenfeng, Zhang Shimin. PAM-DETR: a small-object defect detection algorithm for medical gloves based on improved RT-DETR[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 79 -95 .
[8] Wei Wujie, Chen Qingfeng. Fair graph learning via view disentanglement and counterfactual augmentation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 96 -106 .
[9] Cao Feng, Wu Shukang, Zhu Weizhen, Yi Jianbing. Evaluation of contradiction separation clause based on multi-criteria decision making[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 107 -120 .
[10] Luo Cheng, Huang Wentao, He Dongping, Zhang Yue. Weakly persistent centers for a ten-parameter family of complex planar cubic polynomial differential systems[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 121 -129 .