Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 54-68.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2026033102

• Physical and Electronic Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A physics-informed deep learning approach for landslide susceptibility assessment

Huang Zehua1,2,3, Li Zelong2, Zhou Shaoyuan2, Qiu Qinjun4, Gong Bingsheng5, Liang Dong6, Ma Kai1,2*   

  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Intelligent Vision Based Monitoring for Hydroelectric Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China;
    2. College of Computer and Information Technology, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China;
    3. Information Research Centre, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan Hubei 430010, China;
    4. School of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan Hubei 430074, China;
    5. Hydrological and Water Resources Survey Bureau of the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, CJWRC, Wuhan Hubei 430000, China;
    6. Changjiang Research Institute of Geotechnique and Survey, MRW, Wuhan Hubei 430011, China
  • Received:2026-03-31 Revised:2026-05-28 Online:2026-11-05 Published:2026-11-10

Abstract: Landslide susceptibility assessment is an important tool for landslide risk early warning. To address the issue of insufficient capability in extracting and utilizing the physical effects and intrinsic correlations of environmental factors during the assessment process, which makes it difficult to effectively integrate multiple factors for accurate prediction, this study proposes a landslide susceptibility assessment method that combines physics-informed information with deep learning. First, environmental factors are divided into natural conditions and driving factors based on their physical roles in landslides. Then, based on deep learning methods, a natural condition assessment module and a driving factor assessment module are designed to evaluate potential landslide risks and external driving intensity, respectively. Finally, the assessment results are integrated by considering the sequence and causal relationships of the factors to accurately predict landslide probability. The results show that the new method significantly outperforms seven commonly used methods in terms of AUC (0.898 4), overall accuracy (0.829 7), precision (0.795 8), and recall(0.863 6). The self-attention mechanism within the method can accurately identify the key driving factors of landslides, providing precise guidance for disaster prevention and mitigation efforts.

Key words: landslide susceptibility assessment, deep learning, transformer, self-attention mechanism, physical information

CLC Number:  P694
[1] Chen B, Li Z H, Song C, et al. Unveiling the long-term cascading effects of the 2018 Baige landslide and subsequent outburst flood with satellite radar observations[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2026, 334: 115231. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2026.115231.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.2025中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2025.
[3] Ng C W W, Pan T L, Ma P F. A novel deep learning model for landslide mapping using cross-resolution change technique[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2025, 229: 254-269. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.08.004.
[4] Kang Y, Lu Z, Zhao C Y, et al. An extended vector inclination method for inferring detailed slip surfaces beneath landslides from SAR and optical satellite remote sensing image[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2026, 334: 115225. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2025.115225.
[5] Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud B D, et al. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 180: 60-91. DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001.
[6] Myronidis D, Papageorgiou C, Theophanous S. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 81(1): 245-263. DOI:10.1007/s11069-015-2075-1.
[7] Ling X, Ming D P, Zhang W H, et al. White-boxed landslide susceptibility mapping using unsupervised causal model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 4508613. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2025.3605274.
[8] Lv L, Chen T, Liu G, et al. A comparative study of model interpretability considering the decision differentiation of landslide susceptibility models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 4401218. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2024.3522165.
[9] Arabameri A, Saha S, Roy J, et al. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the gallicash river watershed, Iran[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(3): 475. DOI:10.3390/rs12030475.
[10]Amatya P, Kirschbaum D, Stanley T. Use of very high-resolution optical data for landslide mapping and susceptibility analysis along the karnali highway, Nepal[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(19): 2284. DOI:10.3390/rs11192284.
[11]Huang Y, Zhao L. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines[J]. Catena, 2018, 165: 520-529. DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003.
[12]Liu Z X, Zhang Z J, Zhang W C, et al. InSAR-based landslide susceptibility analysis in karst erosion landforms using a non-landslide sampling strategy[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2025, 145: 104997. DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104997.
[13]Liu B, Li D R, Xiao X W, et al. Enhancing Sentinel-2 landslide change detection by integrating multispectral, deformation, and topographic information[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2026, 146: 105116. DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2026.105116.
[14]Guo W X, Ye J, Liu C B, et al. An approach for predicting landslide susceptibility and evaluating predisposing factors[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2024, 135: 104217. DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2024.104217.
[15]Jamaluddin I, Chen Y N, Fan K C. Spatial-spectral-temporal deep regression model with convolutional long short-term memory and transformer for the large-area mapping of mangrove canopy height by using sentinel-1 and sentinel-2 data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 1-17. DOI:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3362788.
[16]Jiang S G, Li N Y, Xu M, et al. SQformer: spectral-query transformer for hyperspectral image arbitrary-scale super-resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5532315. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2024.3463745.
[17]Park J Y, Saad O M, Oh J W, et al. Transformer-based seismic image enhancement: a novel approach for improved resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 5901210. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2024.3510863.
[18]叶润青, 付小林, 郭飞, 等. 三峡水库运行期地质灾害变形特征及机制分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(3): 680-692. DOI:10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0191.
[19]姬建, 崔红志, 佟斌, 等. 基于物理过程不确定性的降雨诱发浅层滑坡易发性快速区划: GIS-FORM技术开发与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(4): 838-850. DOI:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0724.
[20]黄发明, 叶舟, 姚池, 等. 滑坡易发性预测不确定性: 环境因子不同属性区间划分和不同数据驱动模型的影响[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(12): 4535-4549.
[21]杜鹏, 陈宁生, 伍康林, 等. 基于随机森林模型的藏东南地区滑坡易发性评价及主控因素分析[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 51(2): 328-344. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2024.02.12.
[22]毛成忠, 肖湛臻, 杨志彪, 等. 地理经纬双向过渡带和复杂地形下气候的过渡性和特异性: 以宜昌市为例[J]. 中低纬山地气象, 2023, 47(1): 31-37. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6598.2023.01.005.
[23]陈剑, 李晓, 杨志法. 三峡库区滑坡的时空分布特征与成因探讨[J]. 工程地质学报, 2005, 13(3): 305-309. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2005.03.004.
[24]傅角今. 湖南地理志[M]. 雷树德, 校点. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社, 2008.
[25]尹蓉, 李雨欣, 周明薇, 等. 基于GIS的湖南柑橘种植气候适宜性区划研究[J]. 农业科学, 2025, 15(12): 1456-1462. DOI:10.12677/hjas.2025.1512182.
[26]张磊, 宫兆宁, 王启为, 等. Sentinel-2影像多特征优选的黄河三角洲湿地信息提取[J]. 遥感学报, 2019, 23(2): 313-326.
[27]GOOGLE. Google earth engine[EB/OL].[2026-06-05]. https://code.earthengine.google.com/.
[28]地理空间数据云. 地理空间数据云[EB/OL].[2026-06-05]. https://www.gscloud.cn/search.
[29]熊立华, 郭生练, Kieran M.O Connor. 利用DEM提取地貌指数的方法述评[J]. 水科学进展, 2002, 13(6): 775-780. DOI:10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2002.06.021.
[30]中国科学院南京土壤所. 中国土壤科学数据库[DB/OL].中国科学院南京土壤所[2026-06-05]. http://vdb3.soil.csdb.cn/extend/jsp/index_soiltype.
[31]冉有华. 中国土地覆盖数据集[DS/OL].国家青藏高原科学数据中心[2026-06-05].https://www.tpdc.ac.cn/zh-hans/data/f1aaacad-9f42-474e-8aa4-d37f37d6482f/.
[32]USGS. CHIRPS: rainfall estimates from rain gauge and satellite observations[DS/OL].Climate Hazards Center[2026-06-05]. https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/chirps.
[33]OSM. Road data[DS/OL]. OSM[2026-06-05]. https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/.
[34]尚敏, 张惠强, 廖芬, 等. 考虑降雨滞后效应的八字门滑坡位移预测研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2022, 31(3): 242-250. DOI:10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0325.
[35]刘传正, 崔原, 陈春利, 等. 辽宁抚顺西露天矿南帮滑坡成因[J]. 地质通报, 2022, 41(5): 713-726. DOI:10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.05.001.
[36]卢书强, 易庆林, 易武, 等. 库水下降作用下滑坡动态变形机理分析: 以三峡库区白水河滑坡为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(5): 869-875. DOI:10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.05.015.
[37]古腾飞, 段平, 王伟鹏, 等. 滑坡易发性评价方法综述[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2024, 33(6): 1-16. DOI:10.13577/j.jnd.2024.0601.
[38]刘纪平, 梁恩婕, 徐胜华, 等. 顾及样本优化选择的多核支持向量机滑坡灾害易发性分析评价[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(10): 2034-2045.
[39]Fu Y B, Li W M, Fan S S, et al. CAL-net: conditional attention lightweight network for in-orbit landslide detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 4408515. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2023.3321716.
[40]张玘恺, 凌斯祥, 李晓宁, 等. 九寨沟县滑坡灾害易发性快速评估模型对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(8): 1595-1610. DOI:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0029.
[41]李文彬, 范宣梅, 黄发明, 等. 不同环境因子联接和预测模型的滑坡易发性建模不确定性[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(10): 3777-3795.
[42]田乃满, 兰恒星, 伍宇明, 等. 人工神经网络和决策树模型在滑坡易发性分析中的性能对比[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2304-2316.
[43]Kavzoglu T, Teke A, Yilmaz E O. Shared blocks-based ensemble deep learning for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(23): 4776. DOI:10.3390/rs13234776.
[44]Cai J N, Ming D P, Liu F, et al. An enhanced spatiotemporal prediction method on landslide displacement with LDP-ConvFormer and MT-InSAR observations[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2026, 232: 594-612. DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.12.027.
[45]安雪莲, 密长林, 孙德亮, 等. 基于不同评价单元的三峡库区滑坡易发性对比: 以重庆市云阳县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1629-1644. DOI:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230071.
[46]Li Y C, Chen T, Lv L, et al. IED-GCN: an internal and external decoupled graph convolutional network for landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 4414717. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2025.3595205.
[47]滕超, 王雷, 刘宝华, 等. 辽宁抚顺西露天矿南帮滑坡应力变化规律及影响因素分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2018, 29(2): 35-42. DOI:10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2018.02.06.
[1] Tang Chenghua, Yi Jianbing, Wu Xin, Xiong Wenwu, Wang Jingyong. A review of cross-domain few-shot image semantic segmentation methods [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 1-27.
[2] Wang Chenglong, Song Qiang, Li Wenfeng, Zhang Shimin. PAM-DETR: a small-object defect detection algorithm for medical gloves based on improved RT-DETR [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 79-95.
[3] WANG Yan, XU Jie, NIU Mengyuan. Multi-scale Underwater Image Enhancement Network with Adaptive Normalization [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(3): 89-106.
[4] TIAN Sheng, FENG Shuaitao, LI Jia. A Framework for Enhanced Vehicle Trajectory Extraction in Urban Road Scenes [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(2): 31-51.
[5] LÜ Hui, SI Ke. Photovoltaic Panel Defect Detection Based on Improved RT-DETR [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(2): 52-64.
[6] WANG Xuyang, LIANG Yuhang. Multi-scale Asymmetric Attention Transformer for Remote Sensing Image Dehazing [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(2): 77-89.
[7] LUO Yuan, ZHU Wenzhong, WANG Wen, WU Yuhao. A Multi-step Water Quality Prediction Model Based on Improved PatchTST [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(2): 115-131.
[8] HAN Huabin, GAO Bingpeng, CAI Xin, SUN Kai. Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Blade Icing Based on HO-CNN-BiLSTM-Transformer Model [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(6): 13-28.
[9] WEI Zishu, CHEN Zhigang, WANG Yanxue, Hasitieer Madetihan. Lightweight Bearing Defect Detection Algorithm Based on SBSI-YOLO11 [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(6): 80-91.
[10] LIU Tinghan, LIANG Yan, HUANG Pengsheng, BI Jinjie, HUANG Shoulin, LI Tinghui. Facial Acne Detection for Small Object Based on Improved YOLOv8s [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(5): 114-129.
[11] YI Jianbing, ZHANG Yuxian, CAO Feng, LI Jun, PENG Xin, CHEN Xin. Design of 3D Human Pose Estimation Network Based on Spatio-Temporal Attention [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(5): 130-144.
[12] LI Zongxiao, ZHANG Jian, LUO Xinyue, ZHAO Yifei, LU Fei. Research on Arrival Trajectory Prediction Based on K-means and Adam-LSTM [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(4): 15-23.
[13] HAN Shuo, JIANG Linfeng, YANG Jianbin. Attention-based PINNs Method for Solving Saint-Venant Equations [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(4): 58-68.
[14] SHI Tianyi, NAN Xinyuan, GUO Xiangyu, ZHAO Pu, CAI Xin. Improved ConvNeXt-based Algorithm for Apple Leaf Disease Classification [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(4): 83-96.
[15] WANG Xuyang, ZHANG Jiayu. Temporal Multimodal Sentiment Analysis with Cross-Modal Augmentation Networks [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(4): 97-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!