杉木林套种袋料栽培灵芝对土壤有机碳和活性碳组分的影响

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2025070103

Abstract

Abstract: Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the core material basis for maintaining the soil quality of plantation, ensuring the long-term forest productivity and exerting their carbon sequestration potential. To investigate the short-term effects of the "forest-fungus" model on soil organic carbon storage and stability in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) forests and promote the carbon sink function of "forest-fungus" model, the content of soil active carbon components and its contribution to total soil organic carbon in Chinese fir forest after 3 years of cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum with bag were analyzed taking Chinese fir pure forest as the control. The results showed that after planting G. lucidum, the soil moisture content, clay ratio, total nutrient and available nutrient content of nitrogen and phosphorus, and carbon-transforming enzyme activities in the 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm layers of Chinese fir pure forest were significantly increased (P<0.05), but the gravel ratio showed the opposite (P<0.05).In the short term, G. lucidum planting significantly increased the soil organic carbon content in the 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm layers of Chinese fir pure forest, by 117.72% and 42.73%, respectively (P<0.05). Although the contents of Easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC), Particulate organic carbon (POC), Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in the 0-20 cm layer of Chinese fir-G. lucidum forest were significantly higher than that in Chinese fir pure forest. However, EOC/SOC, DOC/SOC and MBC/SOC decreased significantly (P<0.05). In the 20-40 cm layer, only the DOC content of Chinese fir-G. lucidum forest was significantly higherthan in Chinese fir pure forest (P<0.05). The biological factors explained 48.1% of soil carbon components variations, and the activities of carbon conversion-related enzymes were significantly positively correlated with the content of each carbon component. Soil water content was the most critical positive factor affecting DOC change. Structural equation modeling showed that G. lucidum planting can indirectly increase biological activity by increasing soil water content and nutrient content, thereby promoting the increase of soil carbon components and soil organic carbon content. Based on this, the bag cultivation of G. lucidum can effectively improve soil carbon storage and stability, achieving the coordinated development of economic and ecological benefits.

Key words: forest-fungus model, soil carbon components, Ganoderma lucidum, Chinese fir forest, soil organic carbon

CLC Number: S714.2

Mo Wangxin, Chen Mianqiu, Liang Yuting, Mo Lifei, Ma Jiangming, Ai Chenbing, Qin Yunbin. Effect of interplanting Ganoderma lucidum in Chinese fir forest on soil organic carbon and active carbon components[J].Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 221-233.

References

[1] 刘晓曼, 王超, 高吉喜, 等. 服务双碳目标的中国人工林生态系统碳增汇途径[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(14): 5662-5673. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202206221770.
[2] 张逸如, 刘晓彤, 高文强, 等. 天然林保护工程区近20年森林植被碳储量动态及碳汇(源)特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(13): 5093-5105. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202101200215.
[3] 中华人民共和国自然资源部. 2024年中国自然资源公报[R/OL]. 2025-02-28.https://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202503/t20250314_2881973.html.
[4] 冯瑞芳, 杨万勤, 张健. 人工林经营与全球变化减缓[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3870-3877. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.11.046.
[5] 刘世荣, 王晖, 李海奎, 等. 碳中和目标下中国森林碳储量、碳汇变化预估与潜力提升途径[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(4): 157-172. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230206.
[6] Guo J H, Feng H L, Roberge G, et al. The negative effect of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) monoculture plantations on soil physicochemical properties, microbial biomass, fungal communities, and enzymatic activities[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 519: 120297. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120297.
[7] 叶子豪, 罗国安, 王增, 等. 毛竹林下栽培食用菌对土壤性质及细菌群落特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(8): 143-151. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220722.
[8] 梁嘉瑜, 梁语, 马姜明. 林-药种植模式研究进展[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 40(5): 366-375. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2021041801.
[9] Guo J H, Feng H L, Mcnie P, et al. Species mixing improves soil properties and enzymatic activities in Chinese fir plantations: a meta-analysis[J]. Catena, 2023, 220: 106723. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106723.
[10] Zhou L, Sun Y J, Saeed S, et al. The difference of soil properties between pure and mixed Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations depends on tree species[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 22: e01009. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01009.
[11] 余健, 房莉, 卞正富, 等. 土壤碳库构成研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(17): 4829-4838. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201301050036.
[12] Li C Z, Wang Q C, Wu H R, et al. Effects of tree species composition in plantation forest on soilaggregate stability and organic carbon pools in northeastern China[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2024, 39: e00899.DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00899.
[13] 石尚, 于水强, 喻曼曼, 等. 林下植被管理对杨树人工林土壤性质及有机碳组成的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2025, 45(3): 254-263. DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.202412024.
[14] 胡仪, 吴福忠, 吴秋霞, 等. 三个亚热带森林优势种凋落物非结构性碳水化合物含量的季节动态[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(5): 1901-1910. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202103050606.
[15] 李璟, 沈雅飞, 王丽君, 等. 人工林土壤碳的影响途径研究进展[J]. 陆地生态系统与保护学报, 2023(3): 89-98.
[16] 俞有志, 王清奎, 于小军, 等. 施氮磷肥对杉木人工林土壤活性有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(10): 3053-3060. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201810.014.
[17] 李艳鹏, 贺同鑫, 王清奎. 施肥对杉木林土壤酶和活性有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10): 2722-2731. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201610.028.
[18] 许凯. 氮添加对杨树人工林土壤活性有机碳的影响[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2014.
[19] 张仕吉, 项文化. 土地利用方式对土壤活性有机碳影响的研究进展[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(5): 134-143. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2012.05.012.
[20] 唐国勇, 李昆, 孙永玉, 等. 干热河谷不同利用方式下土壤活性有机碳含量及其分配特征[J]. 环境科学, 2010, 31(5): 1365-1371. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2010.05.041.
[21] 张婧, 杜阿朋. 我国林下食用菌栽培管理技术研究[J]. 桉树科技, 2014, 31(4): 55-60. DOI: 10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2014.04.012.
[22] Hu Q Y, Li C F, Cao C G, et al. The rice-edible mushroom pattern promotes the transformation of composted straw-C to soil organic carbon[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023, 353: 108560. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108560.
[23] 李艳红. 真菌菌丝对土壤碳、肥力及结构组成影响的初步研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013.
[24] 何姗, 刘娟, 姜培坤, 等. 经营管理对森林土壤有机碳库影响的研究进展[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(4): 818-827. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.023.
[25] 巢林, 欧梦菲, 陈健, 等. 喀斯特11种典型生态恢复树种凋落叶分解及其对土壤碳排放的激发效应[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(8): 3397-3407. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202307291630.
[26] 曾婷婷, 王路明, 杨康, 等. 长期外源有机物料添加对土壤无机碳库的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(12): 2034-2044. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20240295.
[27] 栗方亮, 王煌平, 张青, 等. 室内恒温条件下稻田土壤中菌渣的分解过程及CO₂释放特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(2): 267-275. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.160678.
[28] 韩艺雷, 龙麟, 张宝成, 等. 林下种植食用菌对不同森林类型的土壤碳含量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2024, 44(5): 24-29. DOI: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2024.05.004.
[29] 邹晓君, 薛立. 林下经济经营模式对土壤理化性质和碳储量的影响研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(2): 79-87. DOI: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2019.02.012.
[30] 吴一凡, 陆志敏, 柳新红, 等. 林下食用菌栽培的现状及展望[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2024, 44(1): 101-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.01.015.
[31] Tang S J, Fan T T, Jin L, et al. Soil microbial diversity and functional capacity associated with the production of edible mushroom Stropharia rugosoannulata in croplands[J]. PeerJ, 2022, 10: e14130. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14130.
[32] 张玲, 张东来. 红松人工林不同复合经营模式土壤养分、酶活性和微生物特征组成的差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(4): 97-105. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202405010.
[33] 王清奎, 汪思龙, 于小军, 等. 杉木与阔叶树叶凋落物混合分解对土壤活性有机质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(6): 1203-1207.
[34] 蒋晨阳, 李宪, 李林欣, 等. 不同杉木林分类型土壤养分特征及其与凋落物养分的关系[J]. 广西林业科学, 2024, 53(3): 344-351. DOI: 10.19692/j.issn.1006-1126.20240310.
[35] 俞月凤, 韦建华, 曾成城, 等. 桂西北喀斯特地区不同林龄核桃间作中草药对土壤生物化学性状的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(9): 1898-1905. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2023.9.009.
[36] Zhang Q Y, Jia X X, Wei X R, et al. Total soil organic carbon increases but becomes more labile after afforestation in China’s Loess Plateau[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 461: 117911. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117911.
[37] 梁超, 朱雪峰. 土壤微生物碳泵储碳机制概论[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(5): 680-695.
[38] 杨那, 毛晓涵, 李彦, 等. 农田土壤有机碳及活性碳组分对秸秆和地膜覆盖响应的Meta分析[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(4): 2292-2300.DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202403209.
[39] Dou T T, Zhang K X, Shi X F, et al. Crop-mushroom rotation: a comprehensive review of its multifaceted impacts on soil quality, agricultural sustainability, and ecosystem health[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(3): 563. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy15030563.
[40] 张洋, 刘月娇, 倪九派, 等. 柑橘/大球盖菇间作对三峡库区紫色土活性有机碳库的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(5): 53-65. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb20150507.
[41] Lu X F, Ren W D, Hou E Q, et al. Different effects of canopy and understory nitrogen addition on soil organic carbon and its related processes in a subtropical forest[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21(1): 235-244. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-020-02761-6.
[42] Tang S B, Zhang L L, Lambers H, et al. Addition of nitrogen to canopy versus understorey has different effects on leaf traits of understorey plants in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109(2): 692-702. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13496.
[43] Wu X H, Jian Y, Chen X J, et al. Molecular mechanism on carbon dioxide assimilation of autotrophic microorganism and carbon translocation in agricultural soils[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(3): stxb201211051538. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201211051538.
[44] 姚理武, 吕明亮, 吴应齐, 等. 锥栗林下棘托竹荪与多花黄精不同复合种植方式研究[J]. 南方林业科学, 2018, 46(1): 57-59. DOI: 10.16259/j.cnki.36-1342/s.2018.01.015.
[45] Huang Y X, Wu Z J, Zong Y Y, et al. Mixing with coniferous tree species alleviates rhizosphere soil phosphorus limitation of broad-leaved trees in subtropical plantations[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 175: 108853. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108853.
[46] 王磊, 刘晴廙, 关庆伟, 等. 平原沙土区不同林分类型下土壤有机碳库特征及其影响因子[J]. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(4): 72-81. DOI: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20220553.
[47] 叶钰倩, 王晖, 栾军伟, 等. 不同树种混交对团聚体有机碳及其组分的早期影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(11): 3350-3356. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202411.007.
[48] Liu D, Wang Y L, Zhang P, et al. Macrofungi cultivation in shady forest areas significantly increases microbiome diversity, abundance and functional capacity in soil furrows[J]. Journal of Fungi, 2021, 7(9): 775. DOI: 10.3390/jof7090775.
[49] Wang Y, Liu Y P, Tian G B, et al. The efficacy of Perilla frutescens rotation and Trichoderma harzianum application in mitigating continuous cropping challenges of Panax notoginseng[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2025, 212: 106228. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106228.
[50] 罗艺霖. 台湾桤木林草复合生态系统土壤有机碳含量的研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2010.
[51] Si Q, Chen K L, Wei B, et al. Formation of particulate organic carbon from dissolved substrate input enhances soil carbon sequestration[PP/OL]. EGUsphere (2023-07-25)[2025-07-01]. https://doi.org.10.5194/egusphere-2023-1483.
[52] 方华军, 杨学明, 张晓平, 等. 黑土坡耕地侵蚀和沉积对物理性组分有机碳积累与损耗的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(3): 467-474. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2007.03.013.
[53] 王艳辉, 赵晓峰, 张健乐, 等. 风水复合侵蚀对团聚体有机碳及其组分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025, 39(4): 267-274. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.04.032.
[54] 刘君恬, 邹维娜, 袁琳, 等. 圈围对海岸带湿地土壤有机碳及活性碳组分的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(9): 4213-4222. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202405050999.
[55] 胡云鹏, 陈末, 杨再磊, 等. 冻融期巴音布鲁克高寒湿地雪被去除对土壤有机碳库稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024, 44(3): 326-334. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20240607.002.
[56] Qian Z Y, Li Y N, Du H, et al. Increasing plant species diversity enhances microbial necromass carbon content but does not alter its contribution to soil organic carbon pool in a subtropical forest[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 187: 109183. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109183.
[57] 韩嘉钰, 魏巍, 余梦瑶, 等. 不同栽培基质对灵芝基质营养物质及胞外酶活的影响[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2016, 27(3): 715-719.
[58] 易瑞峰. 四种林木基质对灵芝产子实体的影响[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2024.
[59] 王庆福, 黄清铧, 梁磊, 等. 灵芝木质素降解酶研究及其潜在应用进展[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(7): 1361-1367. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2015.07.029.
[60] 贺美, 王立刚, 王迎春, 等. 黑土活性有机碳库与土壤酶活性对玉米秸秆还田的响应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(9): 1942-1951. DOI: 10.11654/jaes.2017-1725.
[61] 梁晓君, 周春柳, 韦仕岩, 等. 杉木林下不同生长年限灵芝栽培土壤微生物群落变化特征[J]. 江西农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 42-54. DOI: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2024.06.007.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	TIAN Sheng, ZHAO Kailong, MIAO Jialin. Research on Automatic Driving Road Traffic Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLO11n Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(1): 1 -9 .
[2]	Tang Chenghua, Yi Jianbing, Wu Xin, Xiong Wenwu, Wang Jingyong. A review of cross-domain few-shot image semantic segmentation methods[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 1 -27 .
[3]	Tian Sheng, Xie Hualin, Chen Dong. Energy management strategy for fuel cell vehicles based on improved deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 28 -45 .
[4]	Zhang Xu, Liu Didi. Intelligent charging/discharging scheduling strategy for electric vehicles based on TD3 algorithm[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 46 -55 .
[5]	Yan Yuanyang, Xie Lirong, Zhang Longjun, Ren Juan, Huang Chenchen, Hu Chao. Ultra-short-term wind power prediction model based on multi-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 56 -70 .
[6]	Tao Zhenzhuo, Wei Duqu. Adaptive chaos synchronization of PMSM with unknown parameters[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 71 -78 .
[7]	Wang Chenglong, Song Qiang, Li Wenfeng, Zhang Shimin. PAM-DETR: a small-object defect detection algorithm for medical gloves based on improved RT-DETR[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 79 -95 .
[8]	Wei Wujie, Chen Qingfeng. Fair graph learning via view disentanglement and counterfactual augmentation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 96 -106 .
[9]	Cao Feng, Wu Shukang, Zhu Weizhen, Yi Jianbing. Evaluation of contradiction separation clause based on multi-criteria decision making[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 107 -120 .
[10]	Luo Cheng, Huang Wentao, He Dongping, Zhang Yue. Weakly persistent centers for a ten-parameter family of complex planar cubic polynomial differential systems[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 121 -129 .

Effect of interplanting Ganoderma lucidum in Chinese fir forest on soil organic carbon and active carbon components

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	Huang Hongsheng, Bin Guoliang, Lu Shiji, Ning Ziyue, Du Xiaoyue, Xue Yuegui, Lin Fan. Relationship between soil physicochemical properties and glomalin in habitats of Dashiwei Tiankengs [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 185-194.
[2]	LI Peiyun, ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Rongshu, HU Xinyue, XU Haiying, LÜ Li, LIANG Jianhong, ZHU Jing. Response Strategies of Microorganisms to Nutrient Limitations in Bulk and Aggregates of Limestone and Red Soils [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(1): 156-171.
[3]	DING Suya, MA Jiangming, QIN Yunbin, HUANG Fangling, SONG Lili, LIU Wenqing, LI Mengxia, HE Xinnuo. Effects of Biochar on Soil Organic Carbon Composition and Carbon Pool Management Index of Moso Bamboo Forests [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(1): 180-190.
[4]	WANG Junguang, WANG Peng, ZHAO Zhizhong, TANG Wei, ZHAO Zeyang, LI Yan. Effects of Land Use Types on Soil Organic Carbon Content in Eastern Hainan Island [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(5): 171-179.
[5]	TONG Lingchen, LI Qiang, YUE Pengpeng. Research Progress and Prospects of Karst Soil Organic Carbon Based on CiteSpace [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 40(4): 22-34.