Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 234-245.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2025042601

• Agricultural Science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Forest aboveground biomass estimation based on feature selection and ensemblemachine learning algorithms

Luo Mi1,2, Deng Ziqian1, Zhao Xuesong2,3, Lü Huaquan2,3, Mo Xiaofeng1, Wu Yu1, ZhouWei4*   

  1. 1. School of Geography and Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning Guangxi 530001, China;
    2. KeyLaboratory of China-ASEAN Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Nanning Guangxi 530201, China;
    3. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Remote Sensing Institute of Natural Resources, Nanning Guangxi 530023, China;
    4. School of Environment and Life Sciences, Nanning Normal University, Nanning Guangxi 530001, China
  • Received:2025-04-26 Revised:2025-05-19 Online:2026-07-05 Published:2026-07-01

Abstract: The increasing dimensionality of feature variables in remote sensing-based estimation of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) necessitates effective feature selection to enhance model accuracy. This study focuses on Nanning City as the research area, utilizing Sentinel-2 data as the remote sensing source. Spectral information from various bands, texture features, and additional factors such as elevation, slope, and aspect were extracted. Three feature selection methods including stepwise regression, bivariate correlation, and random forest were employed to identify modeling variables. Biomass estimation models were established based on CatBoost and random forest (RF) machine learning algorithms. Five-fold cross-validation was applied to evaluate model performance, and the best model was used to complete biomass mapping. The results indicated that among the three feature selection methods, the bivariate correlation method performed the best across three tree types: pine, eucalyptus, and broadleaf species. For Chinese fir forests, the random forest method showed superior performance. Specifically: For Chinese fir forests, the combination of the random forest feature selection method and the RF algorithm was optimal (R2=0.58, RMSE=8.53 Mg·hm-2). For Masson pine forests, the bivariate correlation method combined with the RF algorithm was the best choice (R2=0.51, RMSE=11.10 Mg·hm-2). For eucalyptus forests, the bivariate correlation method combined with the RF algorithm yielded the best results (R2=0.56, RMSE=14.91 Mg·hm-2). For broadleaf forests, the bivariate correlation method combined with the RF algorithm also proved optimal (R2=0.35, RMSE=40.55 Mg·hm-2). Feature selection methods have a significant impact on the predictive performance of models. Combining feature selection methods with ensemble machine learning algorithms is conducive to improving the estimation accuracy of AGB.

Key words: feature selection, random forest, CatBoost, forest aboveground biomass, machine learning

CLC Number:  S718.5; TP181; TP79
[1] Fang J Y, Wang Z M. Forest biomass estimation at regional and global levels, with special reference toChina’s forest biomass[J]. Ecological Research, 2001, 16(3): 587-592. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00419.x.
[2] Jacon A D, Galvão L S, Dalagnol R, et al. Aboveground biomass estimates over Brazilian savannas using hyperspectral metrics and machine learning models: experiences with Hyperion/EO-1[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2021, 58(7): 1112-1129. DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2021.1969630.
[3] Mohite J, Sawant S, Pandit A, et al. Forest aboveground biomass estimation by GEDI and multi-source EO data fusion over Indian forest[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2024, 45(4): 1304-1338. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.
[4] Puliti S, Hauglin M, Breidenbach J, et al. Modelling above-ground biomass stock over Norway using national forest inventory data with ArcticDEM and Sentinel-2 data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 236: 111501. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111501.
[5] De Almeida C T, Galvão L S, De Oliveira Cruz E AragãO, Luiz Eduardo, et al. Combining LiDAR and hyperspectral data for aboveground biomass modeling in the Brazilian Amazon using different regression algorithms[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 232: 111323. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111323.
[6] 李春梅, 张王菲, 李增元, 等. 基于多源数据的根河实验区生物量反演研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(3): 64-72.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150209.
[7] 韩宗涛, 江洪, 王威, 等. 基于多源遥感的森林地上生物量KNN-FIFS估测[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9): 70-79.
[8] Luo M, Wang Y F, Xie Y H, et al. Combination of feature selection and CatBoost for prediction: the first application to the estimation of aboveground biomass[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(2): 216. DOI: 10.3390/f12020216.
[9] Chen Z L, Jia K, Xiao C C, et al. Leaf area index estimation algorithm for GF-5 hyperspectral data based on different feature selection and machine learning methods[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(13): 2110. DOI: 10.3390/rs12132110.
[10] 张少伟, 惠刚盈, 韩宗涛, 等. 基于光学多光谱与SAR遥感特征快速优化的大区域森林地上生物量估测[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(5): 925-938. DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2019.5.0925.
[11] 孙钊, 谢运鸿, 王宝莹, 等. 基于无人机多维数据集的森林地上生物量估测模型研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2024, 55(6): 186-195, 236.
[12] 丁家祺, 黄文丽, 刘迎春, 等. 基于机器学习和多源数据的湘西北森林地上生物量估测[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(10): 36-48.
[13] Jiang F G, Kutia M, Ma K S, et al. Estimating the aboveground biomass of coniferous forest in Northeast China using spectral variables, land surface temperature and soil moisture[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 785: 147335. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147335.
[14] Pelletier F, Cardille J A, Wulder M A, et al. Inter- and intra-year forest change detection and monitoring of aboveground biomass dynamics using Sentinel-2 and Landsat[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2024, 301: 113931. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113931.
[15] Li J N, Bao W, Wang X M, et al. Estimating aboveground biomass of boreal forests in northern China using multiple datasets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 4408410. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3408316.
[16] Luo H B, Qin S T, Li J, et al. High-density forest AGB estimation in tropical forest integrated with PolInSAR multidimensional features and optimized machine learning algorithms[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 160: 111878. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111878.
[17] Hu Y F, Nie Y H, Liu Z H, et al. Improving the potential of coniferous forest aboveground biomass estimation by integrating C- and L-band SAR data with feature selection and non-parametric model[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(17): 4194. DOI: 10.3390/rs15174194.
[18] Zhang T C, Long J P, Lin H, et al. A novel feature evaluation method in mapping forest AGB by fusing multiple evaluation metrics using PolSAR data[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2024, 21: 4006605. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2024.3378425.
[19] Li X J, Du H Q, Mao F J, et al. Estimation aboveground biomass in subtropical bamboo forests based on an interpretable machine learning framework[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2024, 178: 106071. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106071.
[20] Chen L Y, He A Q, Xu Z H, et al. Mapping aboveground biomass of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests under Pantana phyllostachysae Chao-induced stress using Sentinel-2 imagery[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 158: 111564. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111564.
[21] Waqas Khan P, Byun Y C, Lee S J, et al. Machine learning based hybrid system for imputation and efficient energy demand forecasting[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(11): 2681. DOI: 10.3390/en13112681.
[22] Yu X H, Ge H L, Lu D S, et al. Comparative study on variable selection approaches in establishment of remote sensing model for forest biomass estimation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(12): 1437. DOI: 10.3390/rs11121437.
[23] GB/T 43648—2024主要树种立木生物量模型与碳计量参数[S].
[24] Cheng K, Chen Y L, Xiang T Y, et al. A 2020 forest age map for China with 30 m resolution[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2024, 16(2): 803-819. DOI: 10.5194/essd-16-803-2024.
[25] 胡天宇,苏艳军. 2021年10米分辨率中国草地覆盖度数据集[DS/OL]. Ⅵ.中国科学院植物科学数据中心(2024-09-06)[2025-04-23].https://www.plantplus.cn/doi/10.12282/plantadata.1607.CSTR:34735.11.PLANTDATA.1607.
[26] 鲁乐乐, 王震, 张雄清, 等. 基于贝叶斯接型平均法和逐步回归法构建杉木单木胸径生长模型[J]. 林业科学,2021, 57(9): 87-97. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210909.
[27] Wen Y Z, Yang A L, Kong X M, et al. A Bayesian-model-averaging Copula method for bivariate hydrologic correlation analysis[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 9: 744462. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.744462.
[28] 吴立周, 王晓慧, 王志辉, 等. 基于随机森林法的农作物高光谱遥感识别[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(1): 136-142. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.018.
[29] Veronika Dorogush A, Ershov V, Gulin A. CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support[PP/OL]. arXiv (2018-10-24)[2025-04-26].https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.11363.
[30] Breiman L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
[31] Li Y C, Li C, Li M Y, et al. Influence of variable selection and forest type on forest aboveground biomass estimation using machine learning algorithms[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(12): 1073. DOI: 10.3390/f10121073.
[32] 段彩红,林辉,龙江平,等.结合改进模拟连续变化检测与分类算法的桉树年龄和蓄积量遥感估测[J].林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 46-55.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240753.
[33] 黄秋霞. 基于Landsat时间序列的广西桉树林识别及生物量估算[D]. 南宁: 南宁师范大学, 2022.
[34] Zhang Y Z, Ma J, Liang S L, et al. A stacking ensemble algorithm for improving the biases of forest aboveground biomass estimations from multiple remotely sensed datasets[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2022, 59(1): 234-249. DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2021.2023842.
[35] Zhai W G, Li C C, Fei S P, et al. CatBoost algorithm for estimating maize above-ground biomass using unmanned aerial vehicle-based multi-source sensor data and SPAD values[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023, 214: 108306. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108306.
[36] 陈宸.基于多平台激光雷达的温带森林地上生物量反演研究[D].济南:山东师范大学, 2024.
[1] YANG Lisha, LIN Chuan, ZHANG Wenqi, CUI Huanfeng, WANG Yanxia. Spatial Simulation of Tea Suitable Area in Yunnan Province under Climate Change Scenarios [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(1): 110-120.
[2] ZHANG Tianxiang, WANG Yanxia, ZHANG Xueke, LIN Chuan, ZHOU Ruliang. Meteorological Risk Forecasting Model for Geological Disasters in Nujiang Prefecture Based on Sample Optimization and Machine Learning [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(1): 201-215.
[3] ZHOU Pengfei, LIU Lin, YANG Jinfan, LIU Tingting, WEI Guiyu, ZHOU Ruliang. Analysis on Spatial Distribution and Harm of Bats in Yunnan Province Based on Machine Learning [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(6): 139-149.
[4] GUO Yonghao, LIU Churui, SUN Zhen. Applying Metabonomics to Predict the Spoilage Bacteria in Beer Fermentation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(5): 161-170.
[5] CHEN Kun, QU Dayi, WANG Shaojie, WANG Qikun. Short-Time Traffic Flow Combination Prediction Model Based on Quadratic Decomposition and Fusion of Multiple Features [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(4): 33-46.
[6] YANG Shuozhen, ZHANG Long, WANG Jianhua, ZHANG Hengyuan. Review of Sound Event Detection [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(2): 1-18.
[7] ZHUO Wenhua, LI Lixiang, PAN Yuanfang, JIANG Yong, LIN Hongling, HE Yan, FANG Yaocheng, LIANG Shichu, SU Quan. Effects of Different Slope Positions on Shrub Species Diversity and Soil Factors in Guilin Hilly Area [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 41(1): 192-199.
[8] CHEN Gaojian, WANG Jing, LI Qianwen, YUAN Yunjing, CAO Jiachen. Data-driven Method for Automatic Machine Learning Pipeline Generation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 40(3): 185-193.
[9] YANG Di, FANG Yangxin, ZHOU Yan. New Category Classification Research Based on MEB and SVM Methods [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 40(1): 57-67.
[10] LU Kaifeng, YANG Yilong, LI Zhi. A Web Service Classification Method Using BERT and DPCNN [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 39(6): 87-98.
[11] ZHANG Yongsheng, ZHU Wenjun, SHI Ruoqi, DU Zhenhua, ZHANG Rui, WANG Zhi. A Confidence-guided Hybrid Android Malware DetectionSystem with Multiple Heterogeneous Algorithms [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(2): 19-28.
[12] LIN Yue,LIU Tingzhang,WANG Zhehe. Quantity Optimization of Virtual Sample Generation with Two Kinds of Upper Bound Conditions [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 37(1): 142-148.
[13] WEI Zhenhan, SONG Shuxiang, XIA Haiying. State-of-charge Estimation Using Random Forest for Lithium Ion Battery [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 27-33.
[14] XU Yuanjing, HU Weiping. Identification of Pathological Voice of Different Levels Based on Random Forest [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 34-41.
[15] ZHENG Wei,WEN Guoqiu,HE Wei,HU Rongyao,ZHAO Shuzhi. Low-rank Unsupervised Feature Selection Based on Self-representation [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(1): 61-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] TIAN Sheng, ZHAO Kailong, MIAO Jialin. Research on Automatic Driving Road Traffic Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLO11n Model[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(1): 1 -9 .
[2] Tang Chenghua, Yi Jianbing, Wu Xin, Xiong Wenwu, Wang Jingyong. A review of cross-domain few-shot image semantic segmentation methods[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 1 -27 .
[3] Tian Sheng, Xie Hualin, Chen Dong. Energy management strategy for fuel cell vehicles based on improved deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 28 -45 .
[4] Zhang Xu, Liu Didi. Intelligent charging/discharging scheduling strategy for electric vehicles based on TD3 algorithm[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 46 -55 .
[5] Yan Yuanyang, Xie Lirong, Zhang Longjun, Ren Juan, Huang Chenchen, Hu Chao. Ultra-short-term wind power prediction model based on multi-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 56 -70 .
[6] Tao Zhenzhuo, Wei Duqu. Adaptive chaos synchronization of PMSM with unknown parameters[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 71 -78 .
[7] Wang Chenglong, Song Qiang, Li Wenfeng, Zhang Shimin. PAM-DETR: a small-object defect detection algorithm for medical gloves based on improved RT-DETR[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 79 -95 .
[8] Wei Wujie, Chen Qingfeng. Fair graph learning via view disentanglement and counterfactual augmentation[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 96 -106 .
[9] Cao Feng, Wu Shukang, Zhu Weizhen, Yi Jianbing. Evaluation of contradiction separation clause based on multi-criteria decision making[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 107 -120 .
[10] Luo Cheng, Huang Wentao, He Dongping, Zhang Yue. Weakly persistent centers for a ten-parameter family of complex planar cubic polynomial differential systems[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2026, 44(4): 121 -129 .