广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 22-29.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2017.03.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于两阶段聚类的电动自行车出行者选择研究

胡郁葱1*, 陈杰1, 邹小健2, 陈枝伟1   

  1. 1.华南理工大学土木与交通学院,广东广州510641;
    2.广东交通职业技术学院运输管理学院,广东广州510650
  • 出版日期:2017-07-25 发布日期:2018-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 胡郁葱(1970—),女,湖北武汉人,华南理工大学副教授,博士。E-mail: 4460902@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(51408237);华南理工大学优硕创新基金(20160526);国家大学生创新创业项目(201510561102)

Research on Mode Choice of Electric Bicycle Travelers Basedon Two-Step Cluster Method

HU Yucong1*, CHEN Jie1, ZOU Xiaojian2, CHEN Zhiwei1   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong 510641,China;
    2. College of Transportation Management, Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, Guangzhou Guangdong 510650,China
  • Online:2017-07-25 Published:2018-07-25

PDF (PC)

261

摘要： 为了得到准确的电动自行车差异化管理量化决策,本文根据2014年南宁市调查数据,基于两阶段聚类方法,对电动自行车出行者进行差异化分类,在此基础上构建南宁市电动自行车与公交车之间的出行方式选择BNL(binary-nomial logit)模型,并运用SPSS 22.0对模型参数进行标定;最后结合南宁市实际情况对模型结果进行分析。本文研究结果表明:在公共交通缺乏或服务水平不高的条件下,电动自行车是中低收入居民主要的通勤出行方式之一;在提高常规公共交通服务水平的情况下,不分类模型有可能高估常规公交的分担率提高程度,分类模型能更有效地反映不同人群的差异性。本文提出的方法能为探讨南宁市电动自行车差异化管理策略提供更准确的量化决策支持。

关键词: 电动自行车, 两阶段聚类, 差异化分类, BNL模型, 出行选择

Abstract: According to the survey data of Nanning in 2014, electric bicycles are categorized using two-step cluster method to get accurate differentiation management quantitative decision of electric bicycles. A BNL mode is developed to describe people’s mode choice behaviors when electric bicycles and buses are accessible. And the SPSS 22.0 software is used to calibrate model parameters. Finally, the results are analyzed considering the actual situation in Nanning. The results show that electric bicycles is one of residents’ main travel modes when public transit system is not accessible or underdeveloped. When the service level of regular buses is improved exclusively, uncategorized models might exaggerate the increase in the sharing rate of public transit system. The categorized models could reflect the differentiations among different groups more effectively. The proposed method can provide more accurate quantitative decision support for exploring the differentiated management strategy of electric bicycles in Nanning.

Key words: electric bicycle, two-stage cluster, the differentiation of crowd, BNL mode, travel mode choice

中图分类号: 

  • U491
[1] CHERRY C, CERVERO R. Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China[J]. Transport Policy, 2007, 14(3):247-257. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.02.005.
[2] CHERRY C R. Electric two-wheelers in China: analysis of environmental, safety, and mobility impacts[D]. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2007:25-40.
[3] WU Changxu, YAO Lin, ZHANG Kan. The red-light running behavior of electric bike riders and cyclists at urban intersections in China[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention., 2012,49:186-192.
[4] BAI Lu, LIU Pan, GUO Yanyong. Comparative analysis of risky behaviors of electric bicycles at signalized intersections[J].Traffic Injury Prevention, 2015, 16(4):424-428.
[5] WEI Longyu, XIN Feifei, AN Kang, et al. Comparison study on travel characteristics between two kinds of electric bike[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 96(11):1603-1610.DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.182.
[6] 金楠.大城市居民低碳出行方式选择影响因素研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2013:74-75.
[7] GRISOLIA J M, LPEZ del PINO F. Some new evidence in the determination of acceptability of urban transport pricing[OL].http://encuentros.alde.es/anteriores/xieea/trabajos/pdf/81.pdf
[8] COLLEY M, BUILUNG R N. Gender differences in school and work commuting mode through the life cycle exploring trends in the greater toronto and hamilton area, 1986 to 2011[J].Transportation Research Record,2016,2598(12):102-109. DOI: 10.3141/2598-12.
[9] 王健,侯亚丽,胡晓伟,等.拥挤收费下基于前景理论的出行者路径选择行为分析[J].交通信息与安全,2011,29(5):25-30. DOI:10.3963/j.ISSN1674-4861.2011.05.006.
[10] ALBERT G, MAHALEL D. Congestion tolls and parking fees: a comparison of the potential effect on travel behavior[J].Transport Policy,2006, 13(6):496-502. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.02.003.
[11] MARCEL H, SONJA H,SYLVIE G, et al. Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007,27(4) :277-292.
[12] GEHLERT T, KRAMER C, SCHLAG B, et al. Socioeconomic differences in public acceptability and car use adaptation towards urban road pricing[J].Transport Policy, 2011,18(5):685-694. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.003.
[13] 何流,段仲渊.基于SP调查的出行时间价值方法研究[J].金陵科技学院学报,2016,32(2):30-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-755X,2016.02.007
[14] 邹君.基于聚类分析法的岗位分类评价研究[D].海口:海南大学,2013.
[15] 汪存友,余嘉元. SPSS两阶段聚类法如何自动确定聚类数[J].中国卫生统计,2010,27(2):202-203.
[1] 邝先验, 吴赟, 曹韦华, 吴银凤. 城市混合非机动车流的元胞自动机仿真模型[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 33(1): 7-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发