公顷网格与公里网格红外相机监测方案比较——以广西弄岗保护区为例

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2020.03.012

广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 92-103.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2020.03.012

公顷网格与公里网格红外相机监测方案比较——以广西弄岗保护区为例

林建忠^1,2, 李生强^1,2, 汪国海^1,2, 施泽攀^1,2, 刘佳^1,2, 王振兴³, 周岐海^1,2*

1.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室(广西师范大学),广西桂林541006;
2.广西珍稀濒危动物生态学重点实验室(广西师范大学),广西桂林541006;
3.广西交通科学研究院,广西南宁530007

收稿日期:2019-01-16 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-06-11
通讯作者: * 周岐海(1976—),男,广西南宁人,广西师范大学教授,博士。E-mail: zhouqh@ioz.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31670400, 31870514);广西自然科学基金(2016GXNSFAA380065);中国科学院生物多样性委员会“CForBio弄岗样地常规监测”项目;珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室基金;广西珍稀濒危动物生态学重点实验室基金

Comparison of Hectare and Kilometer Grid Sampling Strategy with Camera Traps: a Case Study in Nonggang National Nature Reserve, China

LIN Jianzhong^1,2, LI Shengqiang^1,2, WANG Guohai^1,2, SHI Zepan^1,2, LIU Jia^1,2, WANG Zhenxing³, ZHOU Qihai^1,2*

1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environment Protection(Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
3. Guangxi Transpoortation Research Institute, Nanning Guangxi 530007, China

Received:2019-01-16 Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-06-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 比较研究并评估红外相机在不同抽样方案中监测差异性和优缺点,有助于进一步了解监测性能和特征,从而为红外相机抽样方案的有效选择提供科学的参考依据。2012年8月至2015年4月,在广西弄岗国家级自然保护区按照公顷网格抽样方案和公里网格抽样方案分别布设35台和32台红外相机,对区内兽类及林下鸟类进行连续监测。对比分析2种抽样方案对应季节的监测数据发现:1)在相同相机有效监测日内,公里网格抽样方案更快速获取兽类物种信息;2)虽然2种抽样方案监测的物种数不存在显著差异,但监测到的物种组成存在差异;3)公里网格抽样方案易于获取大中型兽类的物种信息,独立有效照片的利用率较高,而公顷网格抽样方案相机拍摄率较高,主要表现在小型兽类的拍摄。

关键词: 红外相机技术, 鸟兽多样性, 抽样方案, 喀斯特石山生境

Abstract: It’s necessary to compare and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of infrared camera surveys with different sampling strategies to further understand the performance of biodiversity monitoring programs. From August 2012 to April 2015, 35 infrared cameras and 32 infrared cameras were set according to a hectare grid sampling strategy, and a square kilometer grid sampling strategy, respectively, at Nonggang National Nature Reserve to monitor mammals and forest birds continuously. It’s found that: (1) Within the same survey duration, accumulation of mammal species information in the kilometer grid sampling strategy was faster than those in the hectare grid sampling strategy; (2) There was no significant difference in the number of species detected by the two sampling strategies, but species composition was different; (3) Sampling rate and utilization rate for large and medium-sized mammals were higher in the kilometer grid sampling strategy, whereas sampling rate of small mammals was higher in the hectare grid sampling strategy. These results suggested that different sampling strategies may be required for different taxonomic groups and research questions.

Key words: camera traps, diversity of mammal and bird, sampling strategy, karst stony mountain habitat

中图分类号:

Q958

林建忠, 李生强, 汪国海, 施泽攀, 刘佳, 王振兴, 周岐海. 公顷网格与公里网格红外相机监测方案比较——以广西弄岗保护区为例[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 38(3): 92-103.

LIN Jianzhong, LI Shengqiang, WANG Guohai, SHI Zepan, LIU Jia, WANG Zhenxing, ZHOU Qihai. Comparison of Hectare and Kilometer Grid Sampling Strategy with Camera Traps: a Case Study in Nonggang National Nature Reserve, China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(3): 92-103.

参考文献

[1] O’CONNELL A F,NICHOLS J D,KARANTH K U. Camera traps in animal ecology methods and analyses[M]. New York:Springer, 2010.
[2] SOLBERG K H, BELLEMAIN E, SWENSON J E, et al. An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006, 128(2): 158-168.
[3] KARANTH K U, NICHOLS J D. Estimating tiger densities in India from camera trap data using photographic captures and recaptures[J]. Ecology, 1998, 79(8): 2852-2862.
[4] O’BRIEN T G, KINNAIRD M F, WIBISONO H T. Crouching tigers, hidden prey: sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape[J]. Animal Conservation, 2003, 6(2): 131-139.
[5] MONDOL S, KARANTH K U, KUMAR N S, et al. Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for estimating tiger population size[J]. Biological Conservation, 2009, 142(10): 2350-2360.
[6] BOWKETT A E, ROVERO F, MARSHALL A R. The use of camera-trap data to model habitat use by antelope species in the Udzungwa Mountain forests, Tanzania[J]. African Journal of Ecology, 2008, 46(4): 479-487.
[7] 汪国海,施泽攀,李生强,等. 基于红外相机技术的赤麂活动模式分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 33(3): 117-122.
[8] 肖治术,李欣海,李晟,等. 探讨我国森林野生动物红外相机监测规范[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(6): 704-711.
[9] Camera Data Team for Wildlife Diversity Monitoring. Camera data network of wildlife diversity monitoring: an online database. institute of zoology, CAS, Beijing[DB/OL]. [2019-01-16]. http://cameradata.ioz.ac.cn (Accessed November 1),2013.
[10]施泽攀,周岐海,肖治术,等. 弄岗森林动态监测样地及周边鸟兽的红外相机初步监测[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(6): 826-829.
[11]张明霞,曹林,邓晓保,等. 利用红外相机监测西双版纳森林动态样地的野生动物多样性[J]. 生物多样性,2014, 22(6): 830-832.
[12]李欣海,朴正吉,肖治术,等. 长白山森林动态监测样地鸟兽的红外相机初步监测[J]. 生物多样性,2014, 22(6): 810-812.
[13]汪国海,施泽攀,肖治术,等. 花坪保护区鸟兽物种的红外相机初步监测[J]. 生物多样性,2014, 22(6): 785-787.
[14]汪国海,李生强,周岐海,等. 广西猫儿山自然保护区的兽类和鸟类多样性初步调查:基于红外相机监测数据[J]. 兽类学报, 2016, 36(3): 338-347.
[15]马鸣,徐峰,朱玛洪,等. 利用自动照相术获得天山雪豹拍摄率与个体数量[J]. 动物学报, 2006(4): 788-793.
[16]肖文宏,冯利民,葛剑平,等. 吉林珲春自然保护区东北虎和东北豹及其有蹄类猎物的多度与分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(6):717-724.
[17]李治霖,康霭黎,姜广顺,等. 探讨基于红外相机技术对大型猫科动物及其猎物的种群评估方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(6): 725-732.
[18]GAIDET-DRAPIER N, FRITZ H, LE BEL S, et al.Cost and efficiency of large mammal census techniques: comparison of methods for a participatory approach in a communal area, Zimbabwe[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2006, 15(2): 735-754.
[19]章书声,鲍毅新,叶彬,等. 不同相机布放模式在古田山兽类资源监测中的比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(8): 2016-2022.
[20]广西壮族自治区林业厅. 广西自然保护区[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1993.
[21]SI X F, KAYS R, DING P. How long is enough to detect terrestrial animals? Estimating the minimum trapping effort on camera traps[J]. Peer J, 2014, 2(1): e374-e374.
[22]KELT D A, VAN VUREN D H. The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range are[J]. The American Naturalist,2001, 157(6): 637-645.
[23]MYSTERUD A, PÉREZ-BARBERÍA F J, GORDON I J. The effect of season, sex and feeding style on home range area versus body mass scaling in temperate ruminants[J]. Oecologia, 2001, 127(1): 30-39.
[24]MILTON K,MAY M L. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates[J]. Nature, 1976, 259(5543): 459-462.
[25]孙儒泳. 动物生态学原理[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2001.
[26]张履冰,崔绍朋,蒋志刚,等. 红外相机技术在我国野生动物监测中的应用:问题与限制[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(6): 696-703.
[27]胡力,谢文华,肖治术,等. 龙溪—虹口国家级自然保护区兽类和鸟类多样性红外相机调查结果初报[J].兽类学报, 2016, 36(3): 330-337.
[28]KARANTH K U. Estimating tiger (Panthera tigris) populations from camera-trap data using capture:recapture models[J].Biological Conservation, 1995, 71(3): 333-338.
[29]WEGGE P, POKHERAL C P, JNAWALI S R. Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies[J]. Animal Conservation, 2004,7(3): 251-256.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

公顷网格与公里网格红外相机监测方案比较——以广西弄岗保护区为例

Comparison of Hectare and Kilometer Grid Sampling Strategy with Camera Traps: a Case Study in Nonggang National Nature Reserve, China

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	唐创斌, 汪国海, 施泽攀, 李生强, 黄振华, 王振兴, 周岐海. 基于红外相机技术的赤腹松鼠活动节律和时间分配分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 38(1): 133-139.
[2]	刘佳,李生强,汪国海,林建忠,肖治术,周岐海. 喀斯特生境中白鹇的活动节律、时间分配及集群行为[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 37(3): 156-165.
[3]	李生强, 汪国海, 施泽攀, 林峰, 周岐海. 广西藏酋猴种群数量、分布及威胁因素的分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 35(2): 126-132.
[4]	汪国海, 施泽攀, 李生强, 周岐海. 基于红外相机技术的赤麂活动模式分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 33(3): 117-122.