广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 139-150.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2018.04.018

• • 上一篇    下一篇

应用田野菟丝子防治薇甘菊对其他植物的影响

宋雪1,2, 蒋露3, 郭强3, 孙延军4, 昝启杰1,5*   

  1. 1.深圳大学生命与海洋科学学院,广东深圳518060;
    2.香港城市大学深圳研究院福田-城大红树林研发中心,广东深圳518040;
    3.深圳市野生动植物保护管理处,广东深圳518040;
    4.深圳园林股份有限公司,广东深圳518001;
    5.广东内伶仃福田国家级自然保护区管理局,广东深圳518040
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-17 发布日期:2018-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 昝启杰(1968—),男,湖北房县人,深圳大学教授,博士。E-mail:10567231@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31470513)

Effect of Other Plants by Applying Cuscuta campestris Yunckerto Control Mikania micrantha H. B. K

SONG Xue1,2, JIANG Lu3, GUO Qiang3, SUN Yanjun4, ZAN Qijie1,5*   

  1. 1.School of Life and Marine Sciences,Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Guangdong 518060, China;
    2. Futian-CityU Mangrove Research and Development Centre, Shenzhen Research Institute of CityUniversity of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Guangdong 518040, China;
    3. Wildlife Protection Administration,Shenzhen Guangdong 518040, China;
    4.Shenzhen Garden Co., Ltd. ,Shenzhen Guangdong 518001, China;
    5. Neilingding-Futian National Nature Reserve of Guangdong, Shenzhen Guangdong 518040, China
  • Received:2017-10-17 Published:2018-10-20

PDF (PC)

146

摘要： 田野菟丝子Cuscuta campestris Yuncker是一种有潜力的可用于生物防治的全寄生植物。为了解田野菟丝子防治薇甘菊Mikania micrantha H.B.K的效果和安全性,在深圳7个森林公园的1 218 hm2薇甘菊危害区投放田野菟丝子并开展野外监测,结果发现:发生危害的薇甘菊面积平均为792 hm2(盖度为53%~73%),投放田野菟丝子后,其寄生率为44%~87%,薇甘菊面积减少了426 hm2左右,盖度下降了21%~53%;受田野菟丝子影响的其他植物有153种,隶属43科109属,其中田野菟丝子接触微甘菊但不产生影响(0级)的植物15种,接触薇甘菊且对其他植物造成影响(Ⅰ~Ⅲ级)的植物有138种,除薇甘菊以外未发现致死种。此结果为大面积使用田野菟丝子防治薇甘菊的可推广性提供了理论与实践依据。

关键词: 田野菟丝子, 薇甘菊, 生态防治, 危害等级

Abstract: Cuscuta campestris Yuncker is a potential holoparasite used for biological control. To understand the efficacy and safety of Cuscuta campestris Yuncker in preventing and controlling Mikania micrantha H.B.K. The dodder C. campestris Yuncker were placed to 1 218 hm2 area of M. micrantha H.B.K in 7 forest parks of Shenzhen and carried out filed monitoring. The results showed that the area of M. micrantha was about 792 hm2 (coverage rate 53%-73%), the rate of parasitism was 44%-87%, and the area of M. micrantha was decreased by 426 hm2 after putting in the field of C. campestris Yuncker. The number of other plants affected by C. campestris was 153 species, belonging to 43 families from 109 genera. There are 15 species of phants were in contact with M. micrantha without harm (Grade 0). 138 species of plants were in contact with M. micrantha and affected other phants (Grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ) without a deadly parasite plant except for M. micrantha. All results provided a scientific basis for generalizability of the control of M. micrantha in large area.

Key words: Cuscuta campestris Yuncker, Mikania micrantha H. B. K, ecologicalcontrol, destructive grade

中图分类号: 

  • Q143
[1] BANERJEE A K, REDDY C S, DEWANJI A. Impact assessment on floral composition and spread potential of Mikania micrantha H.B.K. in an urban scenario[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2017, 87(3): 777-788.
[2] 张国云. 德宏州外来有害生物薇甘菊发生危害与防控对策[J]. 农业环境与发展,2013(1): 49-50.
[3] DAY M D, CLEMENTS D R, GILE C, et al. Biology and impacts of pacific islands invasive species. 13. Mikania micrantha Kunth (Asteraceae)[J]. Pacific Science, 2016, 70(3): 257-285.
[4] COCK M. Potential biological-control agents for Mikania micrantha H. B. K from the neotropical region[J]. Tropica Pest Managementl, 1982, 28(3): 242-254.
[5] DAWSON J H, MUSSELMAN L J, WOLSWINKEL P, et al. Biology and control of Cuscuta[J]. Reviews of Weed Science, 1994, 6: 265-317.
[6] VURRO E, RUOTOLO R, OTTONELLO S, et al. Phytochelatins govern zinc/copper homeostasis and cadmium detoxification in Cuscuta campestris parasitizing daucus carota[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2011, 72(1): 26-33.
[7] JESCHKE W D, BAUMEL P, RATH N, et al. Modeling of the flows and partitioning of carbon and nitrogen in the Holoparasite Cuscuta.reflexa Roxb and its host Lupinus-albusl.2. folows between host and parasite and within the parasitezed host[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1994, 45(275): 801-812.
[8] VAN DER KOOIJ T, KRAUSE K, DORR I, et al. Molecular, aunctional and ultrastructural characterisation of plastids from six species of the parasitic flowering plant genus Cuscuta[J]. Planta, 2000, 210(5): 701-707.
[9] BIRSCHWILKS M, HAUPT S, HOFIUS D, et al. Transfer of phloem-mobile substances from the host plants to the holoparasite Cuscuta sp.[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57(4): 911-921.
[10] 昝启杰,王伯荪,王勇军,等. 田野菟丝子控制薇甘菊的生态评价[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版),2002,41(6): 60-63.
[11] 邓雄,冯惠玲,叶万辉,等. 寄生植物菟丝子防治外来种薇甘菊研究初探[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2003,11(2): 117-122.
[12] 李钧敏. 田野菟丝子寄生入侵植物薇甘菊对土壤微生物和薏苡的影响[D]. 成都:西南大学, 2008.
[13] 刘梦佼,洪岚,沈浩,等. 薇甘菊可溶性蛋白和抗氧化酶活性对田野菟丝子不同寄生密度的响应(英文)[J]. 广西植物,2011,34(4): 520-525.
[14] 昝启杰,王伯荪,王勇军,等. 薇甘菊的危害与田野菟丝子的防除作用[J]. 植物生态学报,2003, 27(6): 822-828.
[15] 许少嫦,高亿波,林绪平,等. 广东薇甘菊发生现状、防治和研究进展[J]. 广东林业科技,2013,29(4): 83-89.
[16] WU Zhi, GUO Qiang, LI Mingguang, et al. Factors restraining parasitism of the invasive vine Mikania micrantha by the holoparasitic plant Cuscuta campestris[J]. Biological Invasions, 2013, 15(12): 2755-2762.
[17] 胡传伟, 孙冰, 庄梅梅, 等. 深圳羊台山近自然风景林树种组成与垂直结构[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010(4):112-116.
[18] 王海军, 程华荣, 林石狮, 等. 羊台山森林公园植物区系研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2014(6):95-99.
[19] 陈姝. 深圳将建第二个自然保护区[N]. 深圳商报,2006-07-06(A1).
[20] 赵晴, 刘莉娜, 陈丹, 等. 深圳田头山市级自然保护区的植物资源调查[J]. 绿色科技, 2016(14):4-7.
[21] 文寄中,张少根.清林径引水调蓄工程使用林地可行性调查研究[J]. 绿色科技,2014(3):181-183.
[22] 王芳, 庄平弟, 廖文波, 等. 深圳三洲田森林公园的植物资源调查[J]. 广东林业科技, 2011(1):74-78.
[23] 陈华成, 曾锋, 邱治军. 深圳凤凰山生态风景林林分改造效果[J]. 广东林业科技, 2004(4):35-38.
[24] 李鸣光,鲁尔贝,郭强,等. 入侵种薇甘菊防治措施及策略评估[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(10): 3240-3251.
[25] YU Hua, HE Weiming, LIU Jian, et al. Native Cuscuta campestris restrains exotic Mikania micrantha and enhances soil resources beneficial to natives in the invaded communities[J]. Biological Invasions, 2009, 11(4): 835-844.
[26] 杨蓓芬,李钧敏. 南方菟丝子寄生对3种入侵植物生长的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2012,38(2): 127-131.
[27] 张静,闫明,李钧敏. 不同程度南方菟丝子寄生对入侵植物三叶鬼针草生长的影响[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(10): 3136-3143.
[28] 张付斗,岳英,申时才,等. 菟丝子属植物在云南对薇甘菊的控制效果及其安全性调查评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017,26(3): 365-370.
[29] 余华. 薇甘菊对菟丝子寄生逆境的生理生态响应机理[D]. 广州:中山大学, 2005.
[30] 白瑞霞,刘永如,康利芬,等. 石家庄市园林菟丝子发生为害情况调查[J]. 河北农业科学,2015,19(5): 29-32.
[31] 杜晓莉,黄梅,马跃峰,等. 广西园林菟丝子发生危害及药剂防除筛选试验[J]. 南方农业学报,2011, 42(7): 748-751.
[32] 席家文,娄巍,洪权春,等. 珲春地区菟丝子种类、分布、为害以及主要寄主的调查[J]. 延边大学农学学报,2000,22(4): 275-279.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发