广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 111-119.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2019.03.013

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Cov-AHP与等级联系度的施工项目管理绩效评价研究

李鲁洁1,董娜1*,熊峰1,罗苓隆2,李弘扬3   

  1. 1.四川大学建筑与环境学院,四川成都610065;
    2.四川华西集团有限公司,四川成都610065;
    3.华南理工大学土木与交通学院,广东广州 510641
  • 出版日期:2019-07-12 发布日期:2019-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 董娜 (1976—),女,山东枣庄人,四川大学副教授,博士。E-mail: dongna@scu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项(2016YFC0701400)

Research on Performance Evaluation of Construction Project Management Based on Cov-AHP and Connection Degree

LI Lujie1,DONG Na1*,XIONG Feng1,LUO Linglong2,LI Hongyang3   

  1. 1.College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610065, China;
    2. Sichuan Huaxi Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu Sichuan 610065, China;
    3. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong 510641, China
  • Online:2019-07-12 Published:2019-07-12

PDF (PC)

491

摘要： 建筑市场竞争日益激烈,施工企业项目管理水平的高低成为企业能否可持续发展的关键,有效的项目管理绩效评价是项目管理水平提升的重要保障。本文深入分析我国工程项目管理绩效评价现状,基于平衡计分卡(BSC)和关键指标法(KPI)重新设计施工项目管理绩效评价体系,从经济、技术、物资、人员、管理5个维度构建评价指标体系,并采用Cov-AHP来确定各项指标的权重,结合等级联系度对项目进行综合评价。最后通过实际工程案例验证了该评价模型的可行性。

关键词: 项目管理, 绩效评价, BSC-KPI, Cov-AHP, 等级联系度

Abstract: With increasing competition in the construction market, the level of project management becomes the key factor to the sustainable development of the construction enterprises, and effective evaluation of project management performance is essential for its continuous improvement. In this paper, the status quo of evaluating project management performance in China is comprehensively studied. The performance evaluation of construction project management system is redesigned based on the methods of balanced score card (BSC) and key performance indicator (KPI), and the evaluation index system established according to the five dimensions of economy, technology, materials, personnel and management. The improved Cov-AHP is used to determine the weight of each index, and the project is evaluated comprehensively by determining the connection degree. Finally, the feasibility of the evaluation model is verified through practical cases.

Key words: project managemen, performance evaluation, BSC-KPI, Cov-AHP, connection degree

中图分类号: 

  • TU712
[1] WANG X Y, Fan S Y.Study on management control auditing on construction project[J].Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 217-218: 262-267. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.217-218.262.
[2] 鞠占玲.平衡计分卡的应用及其改进[J].企业管理,2014,12:110-112.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2320.2014.12.039.
[3] 李林,朱沙沙,王雨婧.低碳经济下公共工程项目绩效评价内涵探析[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2013,27(1):69-72.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-1763.2013.01.011.
[4] 谭涛,熊志坚.工程项目绩效评价指标体系比较研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,23:81-90.DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1000-7695.2014.23.017.
[5] COSTA D B, FORMOSO C T,KAGIOGLOU M, et al.Benchmarking initiatives in the construction industry:lessons learned and improvement opportunities[J].Journal of Management in Engineering, 2006,22(4): 158-167. DOI:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2006)22:4(158).
[6] BASSIONI H A,PRICE A D F,HASSAN T M.Performance measurement in construction[J].Journal of Management in Engineering,2004,2(2):42-50.DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:2(42).
[7] CHOU J S,LEATEMIA G T.Critical process and factors for ex-post evaluation of public-private partnership infrastructure projects in Indonesia[J].Journal of Management in Engineering, 2016, 32(5):05016011.DOI:10.1061/ (asce)me.1943-5479.0000436.
[8] 王安民,马雪.基于BSC-FNN的项目管理办公室绩效评价研究[J].建筑经济,2013,5:34-37.DOI:10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.2013.05.008.
[9] 肖凯.基于平衡计分卡的财务与非财务指标的融合[J].统计与决策,2011,19:180-183.DOI:10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2011.19.054.
[10]张思荣,裘樨盈,张敏,等.基于可拓学与BSC的工程项目绩效评价研究[J].工业工程与管理,2012,17(1): 64-69.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5429.2012.01.012.
[11]李平.EVA在建筑企业业绩考核中的运用[J].财务与会计,2012,7:23-25.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-286X.2012.07.014.
[12]CHOI M S.A study on weights of the factors to evaluate technological capabilities of a bidder in a construction project[J].Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 2007,23:195-202
[13]李治国,滕惠平.平衡记分卡在EPC型企业战略管理中的应用[J].建筑经济,2012,5:73-75.DOI:10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.2012.05.021
[14]THIPPARAT T.A fuzzy multiple criteria decision framework for engineering performance evaluation[J]. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning,2009,5:322-325.DOI:10.1504/ijtip.2009.026752
[15 ]谢忠秋.Cov-AHP:层次分析法的一种改进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015,8:137-148.DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2015.08.009
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孟春梅, 陆世银, 梁永红, 莫肖敏, 李卫东, 黄远洁, 成晓静, 苏志恒, 郑华. 岩黄连总碱诱导肝星状细胞凋亡和自噬的电镜实验研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 76 -79 .
[2] 李钰慧, 陈泽柠, 黄中豪, 周岐海. 广西弄岗熊猴的雨季活动时间分配[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 80 -86 .
[3] 覃盈盈, 漆光超, 梁士楚. 凤眼莲组织浸提液对靖西海菜花种子萌发的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 87 -92 .
[4] 韦宏金, 周喜乐, 金冬梅, 严岳鸿. 湖南蕨类植物增补[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 101 -106 .
[5] 包金萍, 郑连斌, 宇克莉, 宋雪, 田金源, 董文静. 大凉山彝族成人皮褶厚度特征[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 107 -112 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发