五台山南台土壤重金属特征及污染风险评价

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2018.04.013

广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 99-107.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2018.04.013

五台山南台土壤重金属特征及污染风险评价

郑海霞¹, 王月^2*, 陈芬³, 勾朝阳¹, 郑庆荣¹

1.忻州师范学院地理系,山西忻州034000;
2.广西师范大学环境与资源学院,广西桂林541006;
3.铜仁学院乌江学院,贵州铜仁565200

收稿日期:2018-01-30 发布日期:2018-10-20
通讯作者: 王月(1980—),女,辽宁沈阳人,广西师范大学副教授,博士。E-mail:wangyue800312@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金(41701038);忻州师范学院青年基金(QN201325);广西师范大学珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室主任基金(ERESEP2015Z14);岩溶生态与环境变化研究广西高校重点实验室主任基金(YRHJ15Z014);广西自然科学基金(2017GXNSFBA198129);广西师范大学重点项目(2016ZD006);广东省自然科学基金(2015A030310275);广西师范大学博士科研启动项目

Pollution Characteristics and Potential Ecological Risk Assessmentof Soil Heavy Metal in the South Top of Wutai Mountain, Shanxi, China

ZHENG Haixia¹, WANG Yue^2*, CHEN Fen³, GOU Chaoyang, ZHENG Qingrong¹

1.Geography Department, Xinzhou Teachers University, Xinzhou Shanxi 034000, China;
2. School of Environment and Resource, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
3.Wujiang Faculty, Tongren University, Tongren Guizhou 565200, China

Received:2018-01-30 Published:2018-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过采集五台山南台西进山口至南台顶公路段两侧的土样,分析不同海拔和不同深度土层中土壤的Cu、Zn、Pb、Cr、Ni、Cd、As等7种重金属元素的含量,运用地累积指数法和潜在生态风险指数法对土壤重金属污染进行分析和评价。结果表明:(1)五台山南台土壤环境总体污染程度处于“无—偏中度”污染;(2)随海拔的升高,重金属污染程度有加大的趋势;0~10 cm土层中重金属的污染程度普遍高于10~20 cm土层;(3)各重金属潜在生态危害风险程度由强到弱依次为:Cd>As>Cu>Ni>Cr>Pb>Zn,且随海拔高度升高而增大,总体上处于“高生态风险”等级, 0～10 cm与10～20 cm土层的潜在综合生态风险等级分别为 “极高生态风险”和“较高生态风险”,其中Cd的影响占绝对主导地位。

关键词: 土壤重金属, 地积累指数, 潜在生态风险, 污染评价, 五台山南台

Abstract: In this study, Cu、Zn、Pb、Cr、Ni、Cd and As were analyzed in the soil samples and they were collected on the highways from the west entrance to the top of the south of Wutai Mountain in different elevations and different soil layers. Two indices—the Index of Geoaccumulation and the Potential Ecological Risk Index were used to evaluate the degree of pollution by heavy metals. The results indicated that the soils in study area were characterized by on-to-partial moderate pollution and posed a high potential ecological risk. With the altitude increasing, the degree pollution and the potential ecological risk increased. The degree pollution and the potential ecological risk in the 0-10 cm layer were higher than that in 10-20 cm layer. The potential ecological risk was characterized by the order of Cd>As>Cu>Ni>Cr>Pb>Zn with the increase of altitude, which belonged to the level of “high ecological risk” on the whole. The potential comprehensive ecological risk level of 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm soil layers is “the highest ecological risk” and “higher ecological risk” respectively with the predominant risk factor being Cd.

Key words: soil heavy metals, geoaccumulation index, potential ecological risk, pollution evaluation, the south top of Wutai mountain, Shanxi, China

中图分类号:

郑海霞, 王月, 陈芬, 勾朝阳, 郑庆荣. 五台山南台土壤重金属特征及污染风险评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(4): 99-107.

ZHENG Haixia, WANG Yue, CHEN Fen, GOU Chaoyang, ZHENG Qingrong. Pollution Characteristics and Potential Ecological Risk Assessmentof Soil Heavy Metal in the South Top of Wutai Mountain, Shanxi, China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 99-107.

参考文献

[1] 陆林,巩劼,晋秀龙. 旅游干扰对黄山风景区土壤的影响[J].地理研究,2011,30(2):209-223.
[2] 林跃胜,方凤满,魏晓飞,等. 黄山景区土壤重金属分布特征及其潜在生态风险评价[J].水土保持学报,2005,42(2):256-260.
[3] 吴艳军. 旅游活动和不同土地利用方式对五台山自然保护区土壤理化性质的影响[D].晋中:山西农业大学, 2014.
[4] 曹丽娟. 旅游干扰对河南云台山风景区土壤质量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2015,22(4):67-71.
[5] 金亚征,郑志新,常美花,等. 旅游活动对草原植被、土壤环境的影响及控制对策[J].草业科学,2017,3(2):310-320.
[6] 倪珊珊,彭琳,高越. 旅游干扰对峨眉山风景区土壤及植被的影响[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(3):93-96.
[7] 张晓芹,孙磊,张强. 旅游干扰对济南千佛山风景区土壤部分生态因子的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):332-336.
[8] 汪洪旭. 旅游干扰对九宫山景区土壤养分、微生物群落结构及酶活性的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(5):735-740.
[9] 李鹏,濮励杰,章锦河. 旅游活动对土壤环境影响的国内研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(8):1097-1105.
[10] CILIMBURG A. Wildland recreation and human waste: a review of problems,practices and concerns[J].Environment Management,1999,125(6):587-592.
[11] 段青倩. 旅游踩踏对五台山自然保护区山地草甸土壤生物及质量的影响[D].晋中:山西农业大学,2015.
[12] 王坤. 旅游活动对五台山自然保护区山地草甸植被影响的研究[D].晋中:山西农业大学,2015.
[13] 段青倩,樊文华,吴艳军,等. 旅游活动对五台山土壤微生物数量及微生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2014,42(11): 1192-1196.
[14] GREEN D M. Recreational impacts on erosion and runoff in a central Arizona riparian area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,53(1):38-42.
[15] COLE D N,BAYFIELD N G. Recreational trampling of vegetation: standard experimental procedures[J].Biological Conservation,1993, 63: 209-215.
[16] 谭小爱,王平,邹亚萍,等. 旅游活动对香格里拉景区土壤重金属污染的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(6):121-127.
[17] 刘勇,岳玲玲,李晋昌. 太原市土壤重金属污染及其潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(6):1285-1293.
[18] WU Zhihui,LIU Fenwu,FAN Wenhua. Characteristics of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 at Mount Buddhism Scenic Spot,Shanxi,China[J].Atmosphere,2015,6(8):1195-1210.
[19] 李桃,周俊,李伟,等.生物沥浸对自然干化污泥重金属去除效果研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(2):569-575.
[20] 赖燕平,唐文杰,邓华,等.锰矿农作物恢复区土壤重金属污染模糊综合评价[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,27(3):76-80.
[21] 马大羽,靳宗立,郑家烷,等. 五台山土壤环境背景值研究[J].中国环境监测,1986,2(3):40-42.
[22] 虞敏达,张慧,何小松. 典型农业活动区土壤重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J].环境工程学报,2016, 10(3):1500-1507.
[23] 何绪文,房增强,王宇翔. 北京某污水处理厂污泥重金属污染特征、潜在生态风险及健康风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(3):1092-1098.
[24] 齐鹏,余树全,张超,等. 城市地表水表层沉积物重金属污染特征与潜在生态风险评估: 以永康市为例[J].环境科学,2015,36(12):4486-4493.
[25] 王丹丹,郑庆荣,侯艳军,等.五台山北麓土壤重金属含量的空间分布与污染评价[J].环境工程,2018,36(3):164-168.
[26] 马建华,朱玉涛.嵩山景区旅游活动对土壤组成和性质的影响[J].土壤学报,2009,46(1):164-168.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

五台山南台土壤重金属特征及污染风险评价

Pollution Characteristics and Potential Ecological Risk Assessmentof Soil Heavy Metal in the South Top of Wutai Mountain, Shanxi, China

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	彭丽梅, 赵理, 周悟, 胡月明. 广州市从化区耕地土壤重金属风险评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 38(5): 118-129.
[2]	徐婷婷, 余秋平, 漆培艺, 刘可慧, 李艺, 蒋永荣, 于方明. 不同淋洗剂对矿区土壤重金属解吸的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 37(2): 188-193.
[3]	张俊, 黎道洪, 杜典松. 贵州龙井洞和白龙洞裸灶螽对重金属的富集[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 30(4): 104-109.