Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 149-156.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2017.03.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Variation Microbial Biomass and Enzyme Activities in the RhizosphereSoil of the Different Plant Ages of Panax notoginseng

XIE Qiuli1,TANG Yujuan1, SU Houren2, LI Guangwei2, LI Liangbo1,WEI Jiguang1, HUANG Rongshao1*   

  1. 1.Agricultural College, Guangxi University, Nanning Guangxi 530005,China;
    2. Napo County Agricultural Bureau, Napo Guangxi 533900,China
  • Online:2017-07-25 Published:2018-07-25

PDF (PC)

166

Abstract: In order to provide reference for soil problems such as continuous cropping obstacles and soil borne disease, the experiment was carried out with the rhizosphere soil of Panax notoginseng at different plant ages as material, the changes of the number of bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes and their enzyme activities were determined. The results show that with the increase of the planted age, the number of rhizosphere bacteria, fungi and actinomyces were reduced, with the most quantity of soil microbial in CK, the second in 1 year-old soil and the minimum in 3 year-old soil. . From April to December, the rhizosphere bacteria of 1 year-old were reduced by 23%-74%, the fungi were decreased by 6%-37.5%, and the actinomyces by 12%- 66.7%. The rhizosphere bacteria of 2 year-old were decreased by 18%-80.7% , the fungi were reduced by 50%-60% and the actinomyces by 32%-79%; The rhizosphere bacteria of 1 year-old were reduced by 37%-87.9%, the fungi were reduced by 50%-75% and the actinomyces by 33%-52%;while the catalase, urease, phosphatase activity were decreased with the order that CK (never planted)soil enzyme activity ranked the first,the1year the second, and 3 years old the minimum. Therefore, the plant age of Panax notoginseng had a great influence on its rhizosphere microorganisms and enzyme activities. The amount of Panax notoginseng rhizosphere microorganisms decreases with the increase of the planted age, and the neutral phosphatase, urease and catalase enzymes activity decreased.

Key words: Panax notoginseng, rhizosphere soil, microbial community structure, enzyme activity

CLC Number: 

  • S567.236
[1] 郑良永,胡剑非,林昌华,等. 作物连作障碍的产生及防治[J].热带农业科学, 2005,25(2):58-62.
[2] STEENWERTHA K L, JACKSONA L E, CALDERO F J, et al. Soil microbialcommunity composition and land use history in cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California[J]. Soil Biologyand Biochemistry, 2002, 34(11) : 1599-1611.
[3] BANDICK A K, DICK R P. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999, 31: 1471-1479.
[4] 章家恩,刘文高,胡刚. 不同土地利用方式下土壤微生物数量与土壤肥力的关系[J]. 土壤与环境,2002,11(2):140-143.
[5] SCHUTTER M E, FUHRMANN J J. Soil microbial community responses to fly ash amendment as revealed by analyses of whole soils and bacterial isolates[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33(14): 1947-1958.
[6] 李熙英,金海强,贾斌. 不同生长年限人参地土壤微生物多样性研究初报[J].延边大学农学学报, 2011,33(2): 133-136.
[7] 于慧瑛,吕国忠,孙晓东. 不同生长年限人参根际土壤真菌种类及数量的初步研究[J].人参研究, 2006(4):9-11.
[8] 于寒,吴春胜,王振民,等. 连作对大豆根际可培养微生物及土壤理化性状的影响[J].华南农业大学学报, 2014,35(2):28-34.
[9] 陆晓菊. 三七连作障碍土壤微生物多样性研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学, 2015:2-7.
[10] 孙艳艳,蒋桂英,刘建国,等. 加工番茄连作对农田土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J].生态学报, 2010,30(13):3599-3607.
[11] 马海燕,徐瑾,郑成淑,等. 非洲菊连作对土壤理化性状与生物性状的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2011,44(18):3733-3740.
[12] 游春梅,陆晓菊,官会林. 三七设施栽培根腐病害与土壤酶活性的关联性[J].云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014(6): 13-15.
[13] 关松荫,张德生,张志明. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986: 41-44.
[14] 车玉伶,王慧,胡洪营. 微生物群落结构和多样性解析技术研究进展[J].生态环境, 2005,14(1):127-133.
[15] 张崇邦,金则新,李均敏. 浙江天台山不同林型土壤环境的微生物区系和细菌生理群的多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2001,9(4):382-388.
[16] 陈宗泽,殷勤燕. 大豆连作对土壤微生物生物量的影响[J].大豆通报, 1997(6):15.
[17] VISSER S, PARKINSON D. Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: soil microorganisms[J]. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 1992(7): 33-37.
[18] 赵艳,张晓波. 影响植物根际微生物区系之因素研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2007, 23(8): 425-430.
[19] CATSKA V, VANCURA V, HUDSKA G. Rhizosphere microorganisms in relation to the apple replant problem[J]. Plant and Soil, 1982, 69(2): 187-197.
[20] McKENRY M. The replant problem[M]. Fresno, USA: Catalina Publishing, 1999:124.
[21] 关松荫. 土壤酶与土壤肥力[J]. 土壤通报,1980(6): 41-44.
[22] 罗亚进. 不同林龄桉树人工林土壤微生物及土壤酶活性的研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学, 2014:2-9.
[23] 官会林,杨建忠,陈煜君,等. 三七设施栽培根际微生物菌群变化及其与三七根腐病的相关性研究[J].土壤, 2010, 42(3): 378-384.
[24] SCHIPPERS B, BAKKER A W, BAKKER P A H M. Interaction of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1987, 25(3): 339-358.
[25] 郭继勋,姜世成,林海俊. 不同草原植被碱化草甸土的酶活性[J].应用生态学报, 1997,8(4): 412-416.
[26] 寻路路. 三七种植不同土壤微生态研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013: 3-15.
[27] 叶家颖,马承豪,邓业成. 银杏根际的土壤酶活性研究[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),1997,15(3):72-77.
[28] 韦美丽,杨莉,黄天卫,等. 不同轮作年限对三七叶片生理指标的影响[J].特产研究, 2012(2):36-39.
[29] TIAN Yongqiang, ZHANG Xueyan, WANG Jingguo. Soil microbial communi-ties associated with the rhizosphere of cucumber under different summer cover crops and residue management: a 4-year field experiment[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 150: 101-109.
[1] LU Yuxiang, NONG Zhiwen, SU Chengyuan, CHEN Ruicong, LIU Fanfan, HUANG Zhi, CHEN Menglin. Efficiency and Micro-ecology of Microaeration-AnaerobicBaffled Reactor Treating Swine Wastewater [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 90-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd