Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 90-98.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2018.04.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficiency and Micro-ecology of Microaeration-AnaerobicBaffled Reactor Treating Swine Wastewater

LU Yuxiang1, NONG Zhiwen1, SU Chengyuan1,2*, CHEN Ruicong1, LIU Fanfan1,
HUANG Zhi1, CHEN Menglin1   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Karst Ecology and Environment Change of Guangxi Department of Education,Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China
  • Received:2018-01-30 Published:2018-10-20

PDF (PC)

228

Abstract: The efficiency of the microaeration-anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) was investigated in treating swine wastewater. In addition, the activity of dehydrogenase, protease and micro-ecology in the ABR were also analyzed. At the operation conditions the pretreatment with 8 hours of micro aeration, ABR of the hydraulic retention time was 24 hours, and the adding reflux between the first compartment and the fourth compartment of the ABR, the removal efficiency of COD reached to 70%-90% in the total system, and the removal efficiency of COD was 60%-80% in the ABR. Meanwhile, the removal rate of NH3-N reached to 65%-75%, 40%-55%, respectively in the total system and ABR. The content of dehydrogenase and protease in each compartment of ABR gradually decreased, and the content of dehydrogenase and protease was 41.06 mg/(g·h) and 0.42 mg/g in the first compartment of the ABR, respectively. According to the high-throughput sequencing results, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria were dominant bacteria in the ABR sludge in particular, the abundance of Chloroflexi was 51.12%,46.96%,62.44% and 47.23% in each compartment. Chloroflexi is beneficial to the degradation of a series of complex pollutants. At the same time, known from the heatmap figure, the microbial community structures in the fourth compartment and the first compartment were much closer due to the existence of reflux.

Key words: modified anaerobic baffled reactor, swine wastewater, aeration, enzyme activity, micro-ecology

CLC Number: 

  • X703.1
[1] 徐伟朴,陈同斌,刘俊良,等. 规模化畜禽养殖对环境的污染及防治策略[J]. 环境科学,2004,25(1): 107-110. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2004.s1.026.
[2] 钟成华, 张文东, 刘鹏,等. 包埋固定化复合菌低温下处理养猪废水研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学报),2011,29(3): 52-56. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2011.03.008.
[3] 麻泽龙,周芸,王朝勇,等. 养殖污水处理与高效再利用系统的设计[J]. 中国给水排水,2009,25(6): 44-47. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4602.2009.06.011.
[4] 于帅,李锦,毛大庆,等. 抗生素抗性基因在废水处理系统的来源、传播扩散、归趋以及污染控制研究进展[J]. 环境化学,2013,32(11): 2059-2071. DOI: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2013.11.008.
[5] LU Xueqin, ZHEN Guangyin, NI Jialing, et al. Effect of influent COD/SO2-4 ratios on biodegradation behaviors of starch wastewater in an up fiow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 214: 175-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.100.
[6] CHEN Chongjun, SUN Faqian, ZHANG Haiqing, et al. Evaluation of COD effect on anammox process and microbial communities in the anaerobic baffied reactor (ABR)[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 216: 571-578. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.115.
[7] 詹旭,王翔,高金桃. 采用ABR法处理养猪场污水[J]. 工业水处理,2013,33(2): 80-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-829X.2013.02.023.
[8] 李刚,周兴求,伍健东. 微氧条件下厌氧折流板反应器运行特性研究[J]. 环境工程学报,2009,3(7): 1263-1267.
[9] CHEN Y, CHENG J J, CREAMER K S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99: 4044-4064. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057.
[10] 康福丽,朱国政,林钰,等. AMF对金橘苗根围土壤酶活性及植株生长的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,35(1): 104-122. 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2017.01.017.
[11] 李今,吴振斌,贺锋. 生物膜活性测定中TTC-脱氢酶活性测定法的改进[J]. 吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(1): 37-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2985.2005.01.011.
[12] SU Chengyuan, LI Weiguang, CHEN Menglin, et al. Effect of iron-manganese-sepiolite as heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst on the performance and microbial community of anaerobic granular sludge treatment system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 200: 1065-1072. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.088.
[13] PAN Jing, FEI Hexin, SONG Siyu, et al. Effects of intermittent aeration on pollutants removal in subsurface wastewater infiltration system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 191: 327-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.023.
[14] BADDAM R, REDDY G B, RACZKOWSKI C, et al. Activity of soil enzymes in constructed wetlands treated with swine wastewater[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 91: 24-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.021.
[15] 陈重军,张海芹,汪瑶琪,等.基于高通量测序的ABR厌氧氨氧化反应器各隔室细菌群落特征分析[J].环境科学,2016,37(7): 2652-2657. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2016.07.031.
[16] 闫媛,黎力,王亚宜,等.采用高通量测序分析全程自养脱(CANON)系统不同脱氮效能下的微生物群落结构[J].北京工业大学学报,2015,41(10): 1489-1492. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2015010005.
[1] XIE Qiuli,TANG Yujuan, SU Houren, LI Guangwei, LI Liangbo,WEI Jiguang, HUANG Rongshao. Variation Microbial Biomass and Enzyme Activities in the RhizosphereSoil of the Different Plant Ages of Panax notoginseng [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 35(3): 149-156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd