广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 38-42.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2015.04.007

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于模糊准则的不完全信息双边协商研究

张林兰1, 刘青2   

  1. 1. 湖北大学商学院,湖北武汉430062;
    2.武汉科学技术情报中心,湖北武汉430023
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-24 出版日期:2015-12-25 发布日期:2018-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 张林兰(1982—),女,湖北仙桃人,湖北大学副教授,博士。E-mail: misalinlan9904@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金资助项目(71201050)

Bilateral Automated Negotiation Based on Fuzzy Method with Incomplete Information

ZHANG Lin-lan1, LIU Qing2   

  1. 1.School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan Hubei 430062, China;
    2. Wuhan Centre of Sci-Tech Information, Wuhan Hubei 430023, China
  • Received:2015-04-24 Online:2015-12-25 Published:2018-09-21

PDF (PC)

137

摘要： 本文提出一个不完全信息条件下基于中间agent的双边多属性同步自动协商机制。根据各属性的特征,将多属性分为两类:定量属性和定性属性,并使用模糊准则为协商参与人分别建立了整体多属性满意度隶属函数。在协商过程中,协商参与人针对定性属性的每个离散值,向中间agent同时提交各自关于定量属性的出价组合,然后中间agent根据所提出的协商规则来判断协商是否成功。在整个协商过程中,协商双方的出价信息是封闭的,这在一定程度上减轻了传统协商各方对对方的猜忌,能进一步加快协商进程。最后,本文通过一个案例说明了所提出的协商方法的有效性。我们期望所提出的方法能应用到实际的电子商务市场中来。

关键词: 多属性, 双边协商, 不完全信息, 中间agent

Abstract: An automatic negotiation mechanism of bilateral multiple attributes based on the intermediate agent is proposed in this article in an incomplete information setting. According to its characteristics, the multi attributes are divided into two categories: quantitative and qualitative properties, and based on fuzzy criteria, an overall multi attribute satisfaction membership function for the participants is established. In the negotiation process, the participants, according to each discrete value of qualitative attributes, submit their bid combinations on the quantitative attributes to the intermediate agent, and then the middle agent according to the proposed rules determines whether the negotiation is successful .In the negotiation process, the bid information of both sides is not open, which to a certain extent, reduce the suspicion in the traditional negotiation process, to further accelerate the negotiation process. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated by a case study. It is expected that the proposed method can be applied to the actual electronic commerce market.

Key words: multi-attribute, bilateral negotiation, incomplete information, mediator agent

中图分类号: 

  • N94
[1] LOUTA M, ROUSSAKI I, PECHLIVANOS L. An intelligent agent negotiation strategy in the electronic marketplace environment[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 187(3): 1327-1345.
[2] 吴海燕, 胡山立. 基于遗忘理论和效用的多Agent多问题协商[J]. 广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2008, 26(1):154-159.
[3] WANG G, WONG T N, YU C X. A computational model for multi-agent E-commerce negotiations with adaptive negotiation behaviors[J]. Journal of Computational Science, 2013, 4(3): 135-143.
[4] REN F H, ZHANG M J. Bilateral single-issue negotiation model considering nonlinear utility and time constraint[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2014, 60(4):29-38.
[5] GUTTMAN R H, MAES P. Agent-mediated integrative negotiation for retail electronic commerce[M]// Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: LNCS Volume 1571. Trading (AMET’98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1998:70-90.
[6] OLIVER J R. A machine-learning approach to automated negotiation and prospects for electronic commerce[J], Journal of Management Information Systems, 1997, 13 (3): 83-112.
[7] ZENG D, SYCARA K. Bayesian learning in negotiation[J]. INT J Human-Computer Studies, 1998, 48(1): 125-141.
[8] LIN R J, CHOU S T. Bilateral multi-issue negotiations in a dynamic environment[M]// Proc of the AAMAS Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. Richland: IFAAMAS, 2003:117-123.
[9] COPIC J, PONSATI C. Robust bilateral trade and mediated bargaining[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2008, 6(2/3): 570-580.
[10] FISHER R. International mediation: a working guide[M]. New York: International Peace Academy, 1978.
[11] EHTAMO H, HÄMÄLÄINEN R P. Interactive multiple-criteria methods for reaching pareto optimal agreements in negotiation[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2001, 10(6):475-491.
[12] 宋海刚. 开放电子市场中的议价协议及议价策略研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2005.
[13] ZHANG Lin-lan, SONG Hai-gang, CHEN Xue-guang, et al. A simultaneous multi-issue negotiation through autonomous Agents[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 210 (1): 95-105.
[14] LEE C C, FERGUSON M J. To reveal or not to reveal? Strategic disclosure of private information in negotiation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1): 380-390.
[15] 郭庆, 陈纯. 基于整合效用的多议题协商优化[J]. 软件学报, 2004, 15(5):706-711.
[1] 邹艳丽, 周秋花. BA无标度通信网络的级联故障研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 30(3): 83-87.
[2] 赵明, 牛亚兰, 钟金秀, 梁凤军, 罗茳升, 郑木华. 网络的平均度对复杂网络上动力学行为的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 30(3): 88-93.
[3] 李珏璇, 赵明. 网络的平均度和规模对部分同步状态的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 37(1): 115-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发