广西师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 128-134.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2016.02.019

• • 上一篇    下一篇

红河水系2种盆唇鱼的分类地位研究

李明会, 周伟, 袁静, 其米, 李奇生   

  1. 西南林业大学云南省森林灾害预警与控制重点实验室,云南昆明650224
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-30 出版日期:2016-06-25 发布日期:2018-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 周伟(1957—),男,云南保山人,西南林业大学教授,博士。E-mail: weizhouyn@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(NSFC31160419);云南省重点学科野生动植物保护与利用基金资助项目(XKZ200904)

Comparison on Species Status of Placocheilus(Teleostei: Cypriniformes) from Red River

LI Minghui, ZHOU Wei, YUAN Jing, QI Mi, LI Qisheng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warningand Control in Yunnan Province, Southwest Forestry University,Kunming Yunnan 650224, China
  • Received:2015-10-30 Online:2016-06-25 Published:2018-09-14

摘要: 本文探讨红河水系壮体盆唇鱼Placocheilu robustus Zhang, He et Chen和纹尾盆唇鱼P. caudofasciatus (Pellegrin & Chevey)的分类地位,期望从外部形态和内部骨骼特征方面发现更可靠的分类依据。研究采用外部形态比较、内部肌肉和骨骼解剖比较的方法,2种盆唇鱼共检查和测量标本134尾,解剖观察各3尾。结果表明,吻皮的流苏不成列,难以计数;背鳍、臀鳍、尾鳍和腹鳍条数,侧线鳞和围尾柄鳞数等等可数性状在2种盆唇鱼均未显示差异。纹尾盆唇鱼的背鳍前鳞清晰可数;壮体盆唇鱼的背鳍前鳞隐埋于皮下,不容易直观观察。壮体盆唇鱼和纹尾盆唇鱼胸腹部无鳞区域的大小没有明显差异。2种盆唇鱼的吸盘长/吸盘宽、吸盘长/头长和尾柄高/尾柄长等比值相互重叠,没有明显间断区分二者。口吸盘的形态、头部形态、身体斑纹和各鳍的形态特征等在2种盆唇鱼无差别。肌肉和骨骼的比较结果表明,2种盆唇鱼除尾鳍基骨存在稍许差异,其他骨骼形态上均未发现明显差异。根据外部形态和解剖学特征比较结果,作者认为壮体盆唇鱼与纹尾盆唇鱼之间没有明显区别,不能作为一个独立的有效种,壮体盆唇鱼为纹尾盆唇鱼的异名。

关键词: 纹尾盆唇鱼, 壮体盆唇鱼, 分类地位, 形态特征, 骨骼特征

Abstract: In order to detect taxonomic status of Placocheilu robustus Zhang, He et Chen and P. caudofasciatus (Pellegrin & Chevey) from the Red River system, more reliable taxonomic characteristics are expected to be found from the external morphology and internal skeleton by methods of comparison of the external morphology, anatomic comparison of internal muscle and skeletal. A total of 134 specimens for 2 species would be examined and measured, and three specimens for each species would be dissected. The results showed that there were no differences between two species of Placocheilu in the following characters that their tassel consisted by tubercles in rostral fold not arranged in rows and difficult to count in numbers. The branched ray numbers of dorsal, anal, caudal and ventral fins as well as lateral line scales and scale numbers around caudal peduncle. The predorsal fin scales of P. caudofasciatus could be clearly counted, and that of P. robustus buried in the skin and could not be observed easily. There no obvious difference in the naked and uncovered scales area of thoracic and abdominal between P. caudofasciatus and P. robustus. The ratio of mental adhesive disc length to its width, the disc length to depth of head, depth to length of caudal peduncle were overlapped, and there were no obvious interruption to distinguish the two species of Placocheilu. There were no differences in the mental adhesive disc morphology, head shape, body markings and fin morphology between two species of Placocheilu. The muscle and skeletal morphological comparison results showed that there were no significant differences in muscle and skeletal morphology except slight differences in the composition of the caudal fin base bone. According to the comparison results of external morphology and anatomy, P. robustus could not be differentiated from P. caudofasciatus, and could not be a valid independent species. P. robustus is a synonym of a P. caudofasciatus.

Key words: Placocheilus caudofasciatus, P. robustus, species status, morphology character, taxono- mic character

中图分类号: 

  • Q959.4
[1] 伍献文. 中国鲤科鱼类志:下卷[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1977: 382-384.
[2] 褚新洛, 崔桂华. 野鯪亚科[M]//褚新洛, 陈银瑞. 云南鱼类志:上册. 北京: 科学出版社, 1989: 229-286.
[3] KOTTELAT M. Fishes of Laos[M]. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Wildlife Heritage Trust Publications, 2001.
[4] ZHANG E, HE Shunping, CHEN Yiyu. Revision of the cyprinid genus Placocheilus Wu, 1977 in China, with description of a new species form Yunnan[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002(487): 207-208.
[5] 崔桂华, 李再云. 鲃亚科鱼类一新种[J]. 动物分类学报, 1984, 9(1): 110-112.
[6] CHEN Zimin, PAN Xiaofu, XIAO Heng, et al. A new Cyprinid species, Placocheilus dulongensis, from the upper Irrawaddy system in Northwastern Yunnan, China[J]. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 2012, 251(3): 215-222.
[7] 陈小勇. 云南鱼类名录[J]. 动物学研究, 2013, 34(4):281-343.
[8] 王伟营. 中国野鲮亚科部分类群及墨头鱼属鱼类分类、系统发育及生物地理学研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2012: 1-144.
[9] 褚新洛. 褶鮡属鱼类的系统发育及二新种的记述[J]. 动物分类学报, 1982, 7(4): 428-437.
[10] 周伟, 褚新洛. 云南鲤属 (Cyprinus) 鱼类的分类整理[J]. 动物学研究, 1986, 7(3): 297-310.
[11] 莫天培, 褚新洛. 中国纹胸鮡属Glyptothorax Blyth鱼类的分类整理[J]. 动物学研究, 1986, 7(4): 339-350.
[12] 周伟, 褚新洛. 鮡科褶鮡属鱼类一新种兼论其骨骼形态学的种间分化 (鲇形目:鮡科)[J]. 动物分类学报, 1992, 17(1): 110-115.
[13] YANG Junxing, CHEN Yinrui. Systematic revision of Spinibarbus fishes (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)[J]. Zoological Research,1994, 15(4): 1-10.
[14] 乐佩琦, 罗云林. 鲌亚科类系统发育初探[J]. 水生生物学报, 1996, 20(2): 182-185.
[15] 王大忠, 陈宜瑜, 李学英. 金线鲃属的系统发育分析 (鲤形目: 鲤科: 鲃亚科)[J]. 遵义医学院学报, 1999, 22(1): 1-6.
[16] CHEN Xiaoyong, YANG Junxing. Cladistic Analysis of the Cyprinid Subgenus Cyprinus (Mesocyprinus) Fang (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)[J]. Zoological Research, 2002, 23(1): 185-194.
[17] 王绪桢, 何舜平. 异鲴的骨骼形态及其属的分类位置[J]. 水生生物学报, 2002, 26(3): 253-258.
[18] 李旭, 李凤莲, 刘恺, 等. 中国伊洛瓦底江和怒江褶鮡属鱼类的形态差异及分类地位[J]. 动物学研究, 2008, 29(1): 83-88.
[19] 苏怀栋, 陈圆圆, 龙微鑫, 等. 多种鱼类骨骼标本制作[J]. 河北渔业, 2012(7): 55-57.
[20] 秉志. 鲤鱼解剖[M].北京: 科学出版社, 1960: 1-25.
[21] 郑作新. 脊椎动物分类学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1982: 11.
[1] 韦宏金, 周喜乐, 金冬梅, 严岳鸿. 湖南蕨类植物增补[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(3): 101-106.
[2] 韦宏金,周喜乐,商 辉,严岳鸿. 广西蕨类植物新记录(Ⅲ)[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(4): 98-105.
[3] 周伟, 孙超, 周海涛. 中国澜沧江2种墨头鱼分类地位考证[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(2): 117-125.
[4] 韦宏金, 周喜乐, 金冬梅, 王莹, 朱晓凤, 商辉, 赵国华, 严岳鸿. 广东蕨类植物新记录[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 34(2): 135-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)编辑部
地址:广西桂林市三里店育才路15号 邮编:541004
电话:0773-5857325 E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发