南亚热带桉树人工林土壤肥力障碍因子评价

doi:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2021052604

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长期经营条件下,南亚热带区域桉树人工林土壤障碍问题频发。按土壤类型对桉树主产区进行土壤肥力障碍因子识别与评价,并给林权业主们制定区域化相应的经营、施肥策略,可针对性为提升土壤肥力提供理论依据,对保障广西人工林产业高质量、可持续发展经营具有重要意义。本文采集并分析近3年桂北地区桉树人工林主要种植区红壤、黄壤、赤红壤等土壤类型的典型样品共计298个,运用聚类分析法结合主成分分析法,从15个土壤肥力因子中筛选主要障碍因子,同时引入障碍度模型对不同土壤类型的肥力障碍因子进行定量化分析。结果表明不同土壤类型的主要障碍因子不相同。红壤中,重度障碍因子有4个,分别为pH、全磷、有效锰、有效硼,其中pH障碍度最高(28.20%),而土壤全氮为轻度障碍因子;黄壤中,pH、全氮、有效锰、有效锌为重度障碍因子,pH障碍度最高(36.53%),全钾为轻度障碍因子;赤红壤中,重度障碍因子有3个,分别是全钾、有效镁、有效锌,其中障碍度最高的因子为有效镁(40.72%),轻度障碍因子为有机质、有效锰。由于广西短周期人工林经营普遍施用配方肥料,该区域内3种主要土壤类型的速效N、P、K养分供应较为充分,土壤障碍集中表现为酸化、低磷、部分微量元素缺失等共性问题。但因不同区域立地条件不同,建议林权业主在土壤管理过程中因地制宜,结合土壤类型制定区域化经营策略以减少土壤障碍的发生。

关键词: :隶属度函数, 土壤养分, 短周期人工林, 土壤障碍因子, 障碍度模型

Abstract: Under the condition of long-term management, the soil obstacle problem of eucalyptus plantation in the lower tropical region frequently occured. The identification and evaluation of soil fertility obstacle factors in main eucalyptus producing areas based on soil types, and the development of regional management and fertilization strategies for forest rights owners can provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of soil fertility, which is of great significance to ensure the high quality and sustainable development of Guangxi plantation industry. In this paper, a total of 298 typical soil samples of red soil, yellow soil and red soil in the main planting areas of eucalyptus plantations in northern Guangxi in the past three years were collected and analyzed. Cluster analysis combined with principal component analysis was used to screen the main obstacle factors from 15 soil fertility factors. The obstacle degree model was introduced to quantitatively analyze the obstacle factors of different soil types. The results showed that the main obstacle factors were different in different soil types. In red soil, there were four severe obstacle factors, which were pH, total phosphorus, available manganese and available boron, among them, pH barrier was the highest (28.20%), and soil total nitrogen was the mild disorder factor. In yellow soil, pH, total nitrogen, available manganese and available zinc were the severe obstacle factors, among them, pH barrier was the highest (36.53%), and total potassium was the mild disorder factor. In the red soil, there were three severe obstacle factors, total potassium, available magnesium and available zinc, among them, available magnesium barrier was the highest (40.72%), and the mild obstacle factor was organic matter and available manganese. Due to the widespread application of formula fertilizer in short-cycle plantation management in Guangxi, the available N, P and K nutrients of the three main soil types in this region are relatively sufficient, and the soil problems are concentrated in acidification, low phosphorus, partial trace elements loss and other common problems. However, due to the different site conditions in different regions, it is suggested that the forest right owners should develop business strategies according to the local conditions and soil types in order to reduce the occurrence of soil obstacles.

Key words: membership function, soil nutrient, short-period plantation, soil barrier factor, obstacle degree model

中图分类号:

S714

赵隽宇, 石媛媛, 覃祚玉, 潘波, 黄小芮, 唐健. 南亚热带桉树人工林土壤肥力障碍因子评价[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 40(4): 205-214.

ZHAO Junyu, SHI Yuanyuan, QIN Zuoyu, PAN Bo, HUANG Xiaorui, TANG Jian. Analysis and Evaluation of Soil Fertility Obstacle Factors in Eucalyptus Plantation in South Subtropical Region[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 40(4): 205-214.

参考文献

[1] 杨章旗. 广西桉树人工林引种发展历程与可持续发展研究[J]. 广西科学, 2019, 26(4): 355-361. DOI: 10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20190808.012.
[2]ZHU L Y, WANG X H, CHEN F F, et al. Effects of the successive planting of Eucalyptus urophylla on the soil bacterial and fungal community structure, diversity, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2019,30(6):636-646. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3249.
[3]ZHU L Y, WANG J C, WENG Y L, et al. Soil characteristics of Eucalyptus urophylla×Eucalyptus grandis plantations under different management measures for harvest residues with soil depth gradient across time[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106530. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106530.
[4]徐晓嘉, 雷国平, 张慧, 等. 黑龙江省松嫩平原南部表层土壤肥力质量评价研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2010,17(5):268-272. DOI: 10.1080/00949651003724790.
[5]温远光, 严宇航, 陶彦良,等. 不同林地清理和培肥措施对桉树人工林植物多样性的影响[J]. 广西科学, 2018, 25(2): 117-127. DOI: 10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20180504.001.
[6]廖春贵, 陈月连, 熊小菊, 等. 2007—2016年广西植被覆盖时空分布特征及其驱动因素[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(2): 118-127.
[7]ZAHER H, SABIR M, BENJELLOUN H, et al. Effect of forest land use change on carbohydrates, physical soil quality and carbon stocks in Moroccan cedar area[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 254:109544. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109544.
[8]陈永强, 俞劲炎. 不同利用方式下红壤内在性质的演化[J]. 土壤通报, 2004,35(2):149-151. DOI: 10.1300/J064v24n01_09.
[9]高雨秋,戴晓琴,王建雷,等.亚热带人工林下植被根际土壤酶化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(3):258-272.
[10]胡乐宁, 邓华, 吴华静, 等. 筛分强度对桂东北喀斯特典型人工林土壤团聚体的稳定性影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 33(3): 151-156. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2015.03.023.
[11]孙波, 梁音, 徐仁扣, 等. 红壤退化与修复长期研究促进东南丘陵区生态循环农业发展[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(7): 746-757. DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.07.011.
[12] 蔡泽江, 孙楠, 王伯仁, 等. 长期施肥对红壤pH、作物产量及氮、磷、钾养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 71-78.
[13]张玉梅, 龙胜碧, 吴平成, 等. 锦屏县果园耕地耕层土壤障碍因子分析及对策[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2018, 222(2): 17, 51-52. DOI: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2018.02.020.
[14]翟晓庆, 苏里, 裴久渤, 等. 辽宁省耕地分区利用及其高标准农田建设分区研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(5): 1056-1062. DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2015.05.005.
[15]BOUMA J. Land quality indicators of sustainable land management across scales[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2002, 88(2):129-136. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00248-1.
[16] LIU X B, ZHANG X Y, WANG Y X, et al. Soil degradation: a problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China[J]. Plant Soil and Environment, 2010, 56(2):87-97.
[17]刘玉, 郝星耀, 潘瑜春, 等. 河南省耕地集约利用时空分异及分区研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1218-1225. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.10.013.
[18]吕慧敏, 吴克宁, 周勇, 等. 基于农用地分等的耕地质量主导限制型研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2015, 36(7): 11-18.
[19]孙妍芳, 裴久渤, 张立江, 等. 辽宁棕壤耕地质量评价及障碍因素类型分区研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(11): 130-137, 144.
[20]广西土壤肥料工作站. 广西土种志[M]. 南宁: 广西科学技术出版社, 1993.
[21]许业洲, 侯义梅, 袁慧, 等. 基于Nemerow法和隶属度函数的湖北杉木人工林土壤肥力评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(5): 1-11, 28. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2021.05.001.
[22]张文学, 王少先, 刘增兵, 等. 基于土壤肥力质量综合指数评价化肥与有机肥配施对红壤稻田肥力的提升作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(5): 777-790.
[23]宋鸽, 史东梅, 曾小英, 等. 紫色土坡耕地耕层质量障碍特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(7):1397-1410.
[24]金慧芳, 史东梅, 钟义军, 等. 红壤坡耕地耕层土壤质量退化特征及障碍因子诊断[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(20): 84-93.
[25] DO CARMO HORTA M, TORRENT J. Phosphorus desorption kinetics in relation to phosphorus forms and sorption properties of Portuguese acid soils[J]. Soil Science, 2007, 172(8): 631-638. DOI: 10.1097/ss.0b013e3180577270.
[26]KELLER M, OBERSON A, ANNAHEIM K E, et al. Phosphorus forms and enzymatic hydrolyzability of organic phosphorus in soils after 30 years of organic and conventional farming[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2012, 175(3): 385-393. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201100177.
[27]刘雅静, 张书源, 李静, 等. 坡位和密度对桉树林生产力和林下植被多样性的影响[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2019, 35(4): 48-55.
[28]翁怡琳. 桉树人工林采伐剩余物分解与养分释放特征[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2019.
[29]林立文, 邓羽松, 王金悦, 等. 南亚热带人工林种植对赤红壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3647-3656. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.009.
[30]梁音, 杨轩, 苏春丽, 等. 基于EI的南方红壤区土壤侵蚀县域差异与趋势分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2009, 46(1): 24-29.
[31]曹继钊, 李孝忠. 桉树人工林沃土保育与可持续经营思考[J]. 广西林业科学, 2017, 46(2): 233-236. DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2017.02.025.
[32]王嘉琛, 赵隽宇, 黄康庭, 等. 桂北土壤肥力质量对尾叶桉人工林连栽连作的响应[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 39(1): 106-113.
[33]孙妍芳. 棕壤耕地质量评价及障碍因素类型分区研究:以辽宁为例[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[34]张立江, 汪景宽, 裴久渤, 等. 东北典型黑土区耕地地力评价与障碍因素诊断[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(1): 110-117.
[35]张锐, 刘友兆. 我国耕地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(7): 945-951.
[36]杨豪. 菜粕有机肥解除设施连作辣椒土壤障碍因子的效果研究[J]. 农业装备技术, 2020, 46(1): 20-24, 31.
[37]赵书军, 邱正明, 徐大兵, 等. 高山蔬菜产区土壤障碍因子分析及消减技术[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(9): 86-89.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed