广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 120-126.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2020.01.016

• • 上一篇    下一篇

人工饲养鳄蜥运动能力及其与身体测量值的关系

何明先1,2, 许淑淋 1,2, 李诗林1,2, 罗树毅3, 阳春生3, 程瑞1,2, 武正军1,2*   

  1. 1.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室(广西师范大学),广西桂林541006;
    2.广西珍稀濒危动物生态学重点实验室(广西师范大学),广西 桂林 541006;
    3.广西大桂山鳄蜥国家级自然保护区,广西 贺州 542824
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-04 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 武正军(1970—),男,湖南靖州人,广西师范大学教授,博士。E-mail:wu_zhengjun@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31760623)

Correlation between Locomotor Performance and Body Measurements of Captive Breeding Shinisaurus crocodilurus

HE Mingxian1,2, XU Shulin1,2, LI Shilin1,2, LUO Shuyi3, YANG Chunsheng3,CHENG Rui1,2, WU Zhengjun1,2*   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection(Guangxi Normal University),Ministry of Education,Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology(Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    3. Guangxi Daguishan Crocodile National Nature Reserve,Hezhou Guangxi 542824, China
  • Received:2018-11-04 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-01-15

PDF (PC)

159

摘要： 以广西大桂山自然保护区人工饲养的112只鳄蜥作为实验动物,在环境温度为26 ℃的条件下,测定鳄蜥的运动能力(瞬时速度和持续运动距离)、尾长和附肢长(股骨长、股骨宽和胫骨长),并对运动能力与尾长及附肢长进行回归分析。结果显示:鳄蜥瞬时速度最小值为0.13 m/s,最大值为4.44 m/s,平均值(Mean±SD)为0.93±0.74 m/s;鳄蜥持续运动距离最小值为37.00 cm,最大值为255.00 cm,平均值(Mean±SD)为184.90±60.74 cm。一元线性回归结果显示:鳄蜥附肢除了右前肢股骨长(P=0.054)、右前肢胫骨长(P=0.060)、右后肢胫骨长(P=0.111)3个指标之外,其余指标都与持续运动距离有显著相关(P<0.05);鳄蜥附肢的股骨宽(包括左前肢股骨宽、右前肢股骨宽、左后肢股骨宽、右后肢股骨宽)以及右后肢股骨长与瞬时速度显著相关(P<0.05),其余指标不与瞬时速度呈现显著相关;鳄蜥尾长与瞬时速度以及持续运动距离都不显著相关。逐步回归结果显示:鳄蜥的运动距离与其右后肢股骨长显著相关(P=0.013),与其余指标无显著相关;瞬时速度与右后肢股骨宽显著相关(P=0.001),与其余指标无显著相关。综上可见,后肢对鳄蜥的运动能力起主要作用。

关键词: 鳄蜥, 附肢, 尾长, 瞬时速度, 持续运动距离

Abstract: The experimental animals were 112 captive breeding Shinisaurus crocodilurus in Daguishan Nature Reserve, Guangxi. The locomotor performance (sprint speed and the maximal distance), tail length and limb length(the length and width of femur and the length of tibia) of S. crocodilurus are measured at 26 ℃, and the measured data are analyzed. Results showed that the minimum sprint speed was 0.13 m/s, the maximal sprint speed was 4.44 m/s, and Mean±SD was 0.93±0.74 m/s. The minimum distance was 37.00 cm, the maximal distance was 255.00 cm and Mean±SD was 184.90±60.74 cm. The result of simple linear regression showed that all the indexes of limb were significantly correlated with the maximal distance (P<0.05), except the length of right forelimb femur (P=0.055 4), the length of right forelimb tibia (P=0.060) and the length of right hindlimb tibia (P=0.111). The result of simple linear regression also showed that all the width of femur (the length of left forelimb femur, the width of right forelimb femur, the width of left forelimb femur and the width of right forelimb femur) and the length of right hindlimb femur were significantly correlated with sprint speed (P<0.05), and the other indexes were not significantly correlated with sprint speed. At the same time, the result of simple linear regression showed that tail length were not significantly correlated with sprint speed and the maximal distance. In addition, stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that the length of right hindlimb femur was significantly correlated with the maximal distance (P=0.013) and the width of right forelimb femur was significantly correlated with sprint speed (P=0.001). In summary, the results showed that the hind limbs played a major role in the locomotor performance of S. crocodilurus.

Key words: Shinisaurus crocodilurus, limb, tail length, sprint speed, maximal distance

中图分类号: 

  • Q958.1
[1] 陆洪良. 生物运动力学分析蜥蜴运动表现的种内种间变异[D]. 南京:南京师范大学, 2009.
[2] HUEY R B, PIANKA E R. Ecological consequences of foraging mode[J]. Ecology, 1981, 62 (4): 991-999.
[3] BENNETT A F, HUEY R B. Studying the evolution of physiological performance[J]. Oxford Surv Evol Biol, 1990, 7:251-284.
[4] MAGNUSSON W E, FRANKE C R, KASPER L A, et al. The correlates of foraging mode in a community of brazilian lizards[J]. Herpetologica, 1985, 41 (3): 324-332.
[5] GARLAND T, LOSOS J B. Ecological morphology of locomotor performance in squamatereptiles[M]// Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology, 1994: 240-302.
[6] BAUWENS D, THOEN C. Escape tactics and vulnerability to predation associated with reproduction in the Lizard Lacerta vivipara[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1981, 50 (3): 733-743.
[7] IRSCHICK D J, THEODORE G J. Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2001, 32 (1): 367-396.
[8] 张德成. 捷蜥蜴的生境选择及生活史特征研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨师范大学,2014.
[9] 舒霖, 张群利, 屈彦福,等. 青海沙蜥的热耐受性、选择体温及摄食和运动表现的热依赖性[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(8): 2036-2042.
[10]徐大德, 计翔, 陆洪良,等. 体温、摄食、断尾和雌体繁殖状态对原尾蜥虎运动表现的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29 (4): 1745-1755.
[11]林植华, 计翔. 四种内外因素导致的中国石龙子运动表现的种群内变异[J]. 动物学报, 2005, 51 (2): 222-231.
[12]胡凌君, 杜卫国. 多疣壁虎的体温调节及运动能力热依赖性[J]. 动物学报, 2007, 53 (2): 227-232.
[13]林植华, 樊晓丽, 雷焕宗,等. 不同基质对北草蜥和中国石龙子运动表现的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31 (18): 5316-5322.
[14]杜卫国, 林炽贤, 寿鹿,等. 四种利用不同生境蜥蜴运动能力的形态特征相关性[J]. 动物学研究, 2005, 26 (1): 41-46.
[15]林植华, 樊晓丽, 陆洪良,等. 断尾对蓝尾石龙子能量储存和运动表现的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30 (10): 2541-2548.
[16]刘鹏, 刘琳琳, 刘志涛,等. 断尾对胎生蜥蜴运动能力和选择体温的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30 (9): 2034-2038.
[17]徐大德, 计翔, 陆洪良,等. 体温、摄食、断尾和雌体繁殖状态对原尾蜥虎运动表现的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(4): 1745-1755.
[18]SHINE R. Locomotor speeds of gravid lizards: placing costs of reproduction’ within an ecological context[J]. Functional Ecology, 2010, 17 (4): 526-533.
[19]黄乘明,于海,李友邦,等. 珍稀的国家一级保护动物:瑶山鳄蜥[J]. 野生动物, 2005, 26 (4): 17.
[20]武正军,戴冬亮,宁加佳,等. 广东罗坑自然保护区鳄蜥生境选择的季节性差异[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32 (15): 4691-4699.
[21]王振兴, 武正军, 蔡凤金,等. 鳄蜥人工饲养技术[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2010, 26 (5): 51-55.
[22]何南, 武正军, 蔡凤金,等. 鳄蜥的两性异形[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30 (1): 7-11.
[23]宁加佳. 广东罗坑自然保护区鳄蜥(Shinisaurus crocodilurus)的活动时间分配及食性[D]. 桂林:广西师范大学, 2007.
[24]刘晓燕. 鳄蜥、大壁虎内耳的解剖学研究[J]. 解剖学研究, 1999, 21 (1): 4-7.
[25]黄庆云. 鳄蜥的肌肉系统解剖[C]//两栖爬行动物学论文集. 成都:四川科学技术出版社, 1993.
[26]于海, 黄乘明, 武正军,等. 鳄蜥生活习性的观察[J]. 四川动物, 2006, 25 (2): 364-366.
[27]蒋洁,武正军,于海,等. 鳄蜥的食物识别机制[J]. 动物学研究, 2009, 30 (5): 553-558.
[28]张玉霞, 唐振杰. 鳄蜥的地理分布及其形态变异的探讨[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1984, 2 (1): 39-41.
[29]武正军, 王振兴, 刘海洋,等. 广东罗坑自然保护区鳄蜥运动能力的热依赖性[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 30 (3): 276-281.
[30]李友邦,唐政,赵泽鸿,等. 广西大桂山林场陆栖脊椎动物资源和保护[J]. 贺州学院学报, 2007, 23 (4): 139-141.
[31]SNYDER R C. The anatomy and function of the pelvic girdle and hindlimb in lizard locomotion[J]. American Journal of Anatomy, 1954, 95 (1): 1-45.
[32]REWCASTLE S C. Form and function in lacertilian knee and mesotarsal joints;acontribution to the analysis of sprawling locomotion[J]. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 2010, 191 (2) : 147-170.
[33]BRINKMAN D. The hind limb step cycle of Iguana and primitive reptiles[J].Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1981, 181: 91-103.
[34]EDWARDS J. The evolution of terrestrial locomotion[M]// HECHT M K, GOODY P C, HECHT B M. Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. New York: Plenum Press, 1976: 553-577.
[35]ARNOLD S J, BENNETT A F. Behavioural variation in natural populations. V. Morphological correlates of locomotion in the garter snake (Thamnophis radix) [J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 34 (2): 175-190.
[36]FOX S F, McCOY J K. The effects of tail loss on survival, growth, reproduction, and sex ratio of offspring in the lizard Uta stansburiana in the field[J]. Oecologia, 2000, 122 (3): 327-334.
[37]LU H L, JI X, DU W G. Tail loss reduces locomotor ability but not metabolic rate in a viviparous skink,Sphenomorphus indicus[J]. Animal Biology,2013,63: 369-380.
[1] 谢海，陈亮，黄海燕，何南，刘海洋，武正军. 广东罗坑自然保护区鳄蜥的移动格局及其影响因子[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 35(4): 106-113.
[2] 黄华苑, 刘海洋, 何南, 武正军. 利用非损伤法分析鳄蜥粪便激素水平的变化[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 32(4): 115-119.
[3] 武正军, 王振兴, 刘海洋, 何南, 于海, 黄乘明. 广东罗坑自然保护区鳄蜥运动能力的热依赖性[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 30(3): 276-281.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李钰慧, 陈泽柠, 黄中豪, 周岐海. 广西弄岗熊猴的雨季活动时间分配[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 80 -86 .
[2] 滕志军, 吕金玲, 郭力文, 许媛媛. 基于改进粒子群算法的无线传感器网络覆盖策略[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 9 -16 .
[3] 刘铭, 张双全, 何禹德. 基于改进SOM神经网络的异网电信用户细分研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 17 -24 .
[4] 黄燕萍, 韦煜明. 一类分数阶微分方程多点边值问题的多解性[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 41 -49 .
[5] 温玉卓, 唐胜达, 邓国和. 随机环境下具有阈值分红策略的风险过程的破产时间分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(3): 56 -62 .
[6] 黄兵方,闻炳海,邱文,赵琬玲,陈燕雁. 基于晶格Boltzmann方法的接触角实时测量研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(1): 34 -43 .
[7] 康福丽,朱国政,林钰,胡振兴,邓荫伟,冯玉能,陈胜华,陈付林,刘灵. AMF对金橘苗根围土壤酶活性及植株生长的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 35(1): 104 -112 .
[8] 许伦辉,尹诗德,刘易家. 基于模拟退火的自适应布谷鸟算法求解公交调度问题[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(2): 1 -7 .
[9] 梅春草,韦笃取*,罗晓曙. 分布式发电系统中感性负载的稳定性研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(2): 50 -55 .
[10] 陈宁,何明先,李钰慧,陈洁萍,李诗林,马姜明. 应用正交设计法优选红背山麻杆扦插繁殖方法[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 36(2): 128 -133 .
版权所有 © 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）编辑部
地址：广西桂林市三里店育才路15号　邮编：541004
电话：0773-5857325　E-mail: gxsdzkb@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发