Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 93-100.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2018.03.014
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHUANG Fenghong1, MA Jiangming1, 2, 3, *, ZHANG Yajun1, SU Jing1, YU Fangming2, 4
CLC Number:
| [1] 印红. 中国珍稀濒危植物图鉴[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2013: 32-36. [2] 刘星, 刘虹, 王青锋. 中国水韭属植物的孢子形态特征[J]. 植物分类学报, 2008, 46(4): 479-489. [3] 李婧, 关旸, 范海翔, 等. 三种湿地濒危水韭叶片对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(2): 217-222. [4] 陈家宽, 王海洋, 何国庆. 江西境内珍稀植物普通野生稻和中华水韭产地的考察[J]. 生物多样性, 1998, 6(4): 260-266. [5] 刘建锋, 杨文娟, 江泽平, 等. 遮荫对濒危植物崖柏光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20): 5999-6004. [6] DENG Yanming, SHAO Qingsong, LI Congcong, et al.Differential responses of double petal and multi petal jasmine to shading: II. Morphology, anatomy and physiology[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 144(3): 19-28. [7] XU Chaofan, YIN Y, CAI R, et al.Responses of photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidative metabolism in winter wheat to post-anthesis shading[J]. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(1): 139-150. [8] DENG Yanming, LI Congcong, SHAO Qingsong, et al.Differential responses of double petal and multi petal jasmine to shading: I. Photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 55(2): 93-102. [9] CAI Z Q.Shade delayed flowering and decreased photosynthesis, growth and yield of Sacha Inchi ( [10] QI Xiaoxue, JIANG Yunsheng, WEI Xiao, et al.Photosynthetic characteristic of an endangered species [11] 王强, 金则新, 郭水良, 等. 濒危植物长叶榧的光合生理生态特性[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(22): 6460-6470. [12] 张云, 夏国华, 马凯, 等. 遮阴对堇叶紫金牛光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(7): 1940-1948. [13] LIANG Kaiming, LIN Z F, REN Hongqiang, et al.Characteristics of sun- and shade-adapted populations of an endangered plant [14] 庄枫红, 马姜明, 覃扬浍, 等. 中华水韭对不同营养条件的生理生态响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(4): 705-712. [15] 庄枫红, 马姜明, 陈丽婷, 等. 中华水韭对不同pH处理的生理生态响应[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(2): 133-141. [16] WALDHOFF D, FURCH B, JUNK W J.Fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll concentration, and anatomical features as indicators for flood adaptation of an abundant tree species in Central Amazonia: [17] MATYSIK J, BHAI U B, MOHANTY P.Molecular mechanisms of quenching of reactive oxygen species by praline under stress in plants[J]. Current Science, 2002, 82(5): 525-532. [18] 王成章, 李建华, 郭玉霞, 等. 光周期对不同秋眠型苜蓿SOD、POD活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(5): 407-411. [19] 乔振杰. 盾叶薯蓣中薯蓣皂甙元提取工艺的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2006. [20] 方江保, 殷秀敏, 余树全, 等. 光照强度对苦槠幼苗生长与光合作用的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(4): 538-544. [21] SHEN Yunkang.Some factors limiting photosynthesis in nature[M]. Germany: Springer Netherlands, 1990. [22] MURCHIE E H, LAWSON T.Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(13): 3983-3998. [23] VAN K O, SNEL J F.The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 147-150. [24] XU Changcheng, LI Dequan, ZOU Qi, et al.Effect of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence and xanthophyll cycle components in winter wheat leaves with different ages[J]. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 1999, 25(1): 29-37. [25] 王飞, 刘世增, 康才周, 等. 干旱胁迫对沙地云杉光合、叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(1): 142-147. [26] 张杰, 邹学忠, 杨传平, 等. 不同蒙古栎种源的叶绿素荧光特性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2005, 33(3): 20-21. [27] RALPH P J, GADEMANN R.Rapid light curves: a powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2005, 82(3): 222-237. [28] 凌旌瑾. 环境胁迫对蛋白核小球藻( [29] SAROUSSI S, BEER S.Alpha and quantum yield of aquatic plants derived from PAM fluorometry: uses and misuses[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2007, 86(1): 89-92. [30] PARIDA A, DAS A B.Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2005, 60(3): 324-349. [31] 位杰, 吴翠云, 王合理, 等. 不同光照强度对灰枣叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(12): 112-116. |
| [1] | ZHUANG Fenghong, MA Jiangming, CHEN Liting,SU Jing, ZHANG Yajun, YU Fangming. The Physiological and Ecological Responses of Leaves ofIsoetes sinensis under Different pH Treatments [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 35(2): 133-141. |
|
||