Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 156-164.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2016.04.024

Previous Articles    

Ecological Landscape Patterns in Ebinur Lake Region Based on Remote Sensing

ZHANG Fang1,2,3,Tashpolat Tiyip1,2,3,XU Zhonglin1, 3,Ilyas Nurmuhammat1, 3   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi Xinjiang 830046,China;
    2. Postdoctoral Station of Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi Xinjiang 830046,China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Xinjiang University Ministry of Education, Urumqi Xinjiang 830046,China
  • Received:2016-08-05 Online:2016-07-18 Published:2018-07-18

Abstract: Knowing the changes of ecological landscape in lake areas of arid region is of particular importance to monitor land use change and adjust land use strategies. The current study focuses on Ebinur Lake region, Xinjiang, which suffers from severe salinization and desertification in recent years, to generate land use changing maps using Landsat-TM multispectral images of 1990, 2001 and 2011. Three commonly used classification approaches were compared, i.e., Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC), Decision Tree Classification (DTC), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), to generate landscape metrics for stndying the landscape change during the past two decades in Ebinur Lake area. Three findings emerge from the study. First, among the three classification approaches, SVM produces the most accurate classification. For the year of 1990, 2001, and 2011, the classification accuracy rates are 97.312 3%, 97.778 2%, and 95.082 1%, respectively, Kappa coefficients are 0.963 2, 0.884 2, and 0.918 7, respectively. Second, for the past two decades, salinized and desertified lands are increasing drastically (salinized land increased 374.471 4 km2), along with increased cultivated land. While forest, grassland, water body and other land use types decrease in the same period, with grassland lost over 366.868 8 km2. Third, there is a significant landscape difference among different periods. In general, calculated landscape metrics such as landscape density, maximum patch index, isolation index, Shannon diversity index and Shannon evenness index are increasing during the two decades. On the other hand, area weighted index, mean patch distance index, contagion index, interspersion juxtaposition index and patch cohesion index are decreasing. It seems that the landscape of study area becomes more fragmented during the study period, which leads to relatively higher diversity, and more even distribution of various land use types. Our study results also suggest that the current landscape distribution is relatively stable and even. However, the increasing salinization and desertification of land due to increased human activities (cultivation) requires close monitoring and constant evaluation.

Key words: remote sensing, landscape pattern change, SVM classification, Ebinur lake area

CLC Number: 

  • X171.1
[1] 曹慧明, 董仁才, 邓红兵, 等.区域生态系统重心指标的概念与应用[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(12) :3639-3645.
[2] 占车生, 乔晨, 徐宗学, 等. 基于遥感的渭河关中地区生态景观格局变化研究[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(12):2349-2355.
[3] 刘吉平, 董春月, 盛连喜,等. 1955—2010年小三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 地理科学,2016,36(6):879-887.
[4] WOOD R, HANDLEY J. Landscape dynamics and the management of change[J]. Landscape Research, 2001, 26:45-54.
[5] 张月, 张飞, 周梅, 等. 干旱区内陆艾比湖区域景观生态风险评价及时空分异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(1) :233-242.
[6] 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4):664-677.
[7] MUSACCHIO L, OZDENEROL E, BRYANT M, et al. Changing land-scapes, changing disciplines:seeking to understand interdisciplinarity in land scape ecological change research[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 73(4):326-338.
[8] 刘晓君, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 基于土地利用/覆被变化的流域景观格局与水沙响应关系研究[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(18):1-10.
[9] 毋兆鹏, 金海龙, 王范霞. 艾比湖退化湿地的生态恢复[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012,26(3):211-221.
[10] 王合玲, 张辉国, 秦璐, 等. 新疆艾比湖流域土壤有机质的空间分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16):4969 -4980.
[11] 马姜明, 吴蒙, 占婷婷, 等. 漓江流域岩溶区檵木群落不同恢复阶段物种组成及多样性变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(1):66-71.
[12] 谢霞, 杨国靖, 王增如, 等. 疏勒河上游山区不同海拔梯度的景观格局变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(7):1420-1426.
[13] 杨晓东, 吕光辉. 新疆艾比湖湿地自然保护区胡杨根系水分再分配的估算[J].植物生态学报, 2011,35(8):816-824.
[14] 营利容, 李明阳. GIS分析方法在森林景观格局变化中的应用[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2002,22(1):86-89.
[15] 钱亦兵, 吴兆宁, 蒋进, 等. 近50a来艾比湖流域生态环境演变及其影响因素分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2004, 26(1):17-26.
[16] 王宏, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 谢霞, 等. 新疆艾比湖地区不同土地利用类型的土壤盐渍化敏感性评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(5):593-599.
[17] 贡璐, 韩丽, 任曼丽, 等. 塔里木河上游典型绿洲土壤水盐空间分异特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4):251-278.
[18] 蒋德明, 苗仁辉, 押田敏雄, 等. 封育对科尔沁沙地植被恢复和土壤特性的影响[J], 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(1):40-46.
[19] 张睿, 马建文. 支持向量机在遥感数据分类中的应用新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009,24(5):555-562.
[20] 张飞, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 丁建丽, 等. 干旱区绿洲土地利用/覆被及景观格局变化特征:以新疆精河县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1251-1263.
[1] ZHANG Ru, ZHANG Bei, REN Hongrui. Spatio-temporal Dynamics Analysis and Its Affecting Factors of Cropland Loss in Xuangang Mining Area, Shanxi, China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(3): 121-132.
[2] XUE Yang,ZENG Qingke,XIA Haiying,WANG Wentao. Remote Sensing Image Fusion Based on Convolutional Neural Network Super-resolution Reconstruction [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(2): 33-41.
[3] LIANG Bao-ping, MA Yi-fang, CHEN Gui-nan. Analysis on the Temporal-Spatial Feature of Construction Land in Guilin Urban Areas [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 33(4): 152-159.
[4] WANG Xiao-yan, REN Guo-ye, LIU Wei-dong, WANG Hong. Quick Flood Disaster Statistics Stats Simulation Technology Based on the Remote Sensing and GIS Technology [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 32(4): 32-38.
[5] WEI Chun-rong, HE Chu. A Remote Sensing Image Registration Algorithm Basing on the Improved Mutual Information [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 32(2): 20-25.
[6] LI Hui, YIN Hui, JIANG Zhong-cheng, YANG Qi-yong, WANG Yue. Remote Sensing of Rock Desertification and Soil Erosion in Typical Karst Area and the Key Problems [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 31(2): 133-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!