Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2010, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 56-60.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Root Biomass in the Restoration Process of Subalpine Dark Coniferous Forests in Western Sichuan,China

MA Jiang-ming1,2,3, LIU Shi-rong2, LIU Xing-liang4   

  1. 1. College of Life Science,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of State Forestry Administration,Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China;
    3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering,Protection and Assessment,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China;
    4. Sichuan Academy of Forestry,Chengdu Sichuan 610081,China
  • Received:2010-04-28 Online:2010-09-20 Published:2023-02-06

Abstract: Primary dark coniferous forests,dominated with firs,were cut on a large scale from 1950s to 1980s in subalpine region of western Sichuan,China.At thesame time,native tree species regenerated naturally.As a result,there formed theforests with different restoration period.Roots biomass of forests with different restoration period were investigated in a way of space-for-time substitution.The changes and their distribution patterns of roots biomass were analyzed following forests restoration in western Sichuan.The results showed that roots biomass increased gradually with the restoration of forests whether at lower altitude (2 900~3 250 m) or at higher altitude (3 250~3 600 m).At lower altitude,thefluctuation of roots biomass is between 21.000 and 51.583 t/hm2.While at higheraltitude,the fluctuation of roots biomass is between 20.363 and 35.316 t/hm2.As for the same forests age,roots biomass located at higher altitude is less than that at lower altitude.In lower altitude,the most value of roots biomass is occurred in the soil layer of 10~20 cm,while at higher altitude,which is occurred inthe soil layer of 0~10 cm.The roots biomass in soil layer of 0~30 cm exceeded 90% of total roots biomass.The biomass of coarse roots (>5 mm) exceeded 65.0% among the three diameter classes,while the small roots (2~5 mm) accounted for theleast percentage of total roots biomass.As for the same forests age,there isa trend that more roots biomass located at lower altitude than at higher altitude,whether coarse roots,small roots or fine roots (<2 mm).

Key words: roots biomass, distribution pattern, restoration period, subalpine forests, western Sichuan,China

CLC Number: 

  • S718.54
[1] CRISTINA P M,ALLAN P D.A model to assess restoration of abandonedpasture in Costa Rica based on soil hydrologic features and forest structure[J].Restoration Ecology,2004,12(4):516-524.
[2] ESPELETA J F,CLARK D A.Multi-scale variation in fine-root biomass in a tropical rain forest:a seven-year study[J].Ecological Monographs,2007,77(3):377-404.
[3] 杨玉盛,陈光水,林鹏,等.格氏栲天然林与人工林细根生物量、季节动态及净生产力[J].生态学报,2003,23(9):1719-1730.
[4] 罗东辉,夏婧,袁婧薇,等.我国西南山地喀斯特植被的根系生物量初探[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(5):611-618.
[5] 陈光水,何宗明,谢锦升,等.福建柏和杉木人工林细根生产力、分布及周转的比较[J].林业科学,2004,40(4):15-21.
[6] 张小全,吴可红,DIETER M.树木细根生产与周转研究方法评述[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):875-883.
[7] 宇万太,于永强.植物地下生物量研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(6):927-932.
[8] 杨丽韫,罗天祥,吴松涛.长白山原始阔叶红松林不同演替阶段地下生物量与碳、氮贮量的比较[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(7):1195-1199.
[9] 杨丽韫,李文华.长白山不同生态系统地下部分生物量及地下C贮量的调查[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):204-209.
[10] 张惠良,李兴鹏,顾彩荣,等.地理气候因子对落叶松根系生物量分布的影响[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2004,27(4):37-41.
[11] SCHENK H J,JACKSON R B.The global biogeography of roots[J].EcologicalMonographs,2002,72(3):311-328.
[12] 邓坤枚,罗天祥,张林,等.云南松林的根系生物量及其分布规律的研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(1):21-24.
[1] SONG Zunrong, QIN Jiashuang, LI Mingjin, MA Jiangming, ZHONG Fengyue, YANG Zhangqi, YAN Peidong. Study on Root Biomass of Pinus massoniana Plantations in Subtropical China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(1): 149-156.
[2] LI Xuanjing, LI Shengqiang, WANG Guohai, SHI Zepan, ZHOU Qihai. Diversity and Spatial Distribution of Birds in Guangxi Maoershan National Nature Reserve:Based on Line Transect Surveys and Camera Traps [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 37(2): 143-151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!