会仙湿地中心区枯水期上覆水磷酸酶活性水平分布

广西师范大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2011, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 76-81.

会仙湿地中心区枯水期上覆水磷酸酶活性水平分布

陆祖军^1,2, 侯美珍¹, 梁士楚^1,2

1.广西师范大学生命科学学院,广西桂林541004;
2.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护省部共建教育部重点实验室,广西桂林541004

收稿日期:2010-12-10 发布日期:2018-11-16
通讯作者: 梁士楚(1965—),男,广西百色人,广西师范大学教授,博士。E-mail: gxlsc@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(31060120);广西自然科学基金资助项目(桂科自0991098);广西教育厅科学研究资助项目(桂教科研[2009]25号)

Phosphase Activity and Its Horizontal Distribution of the Water Body inCentral Region of Guilin Huixian Wetland During Dry Season

LU Zu-jun^1,2, HOU Mei-zhen¹, LIANG Shi-chu^1,2

1.College of Life Science,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China;
2.Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi NormalUniversity),Ministry of Education,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China

Received:2010-12-10 Published:2018-11-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将会仙喀斯特湿地中心区划分成7个小区,于2009—2010年枯水期的早、中、晚期4次采集0.5 m深水样(每小区采样点10～15个),分析上覆水部分水化指标和磷酸酶特性。参考太湖水体富营养化评价标准,会仙喀斯特湿地上覆水处于Ⅳ～Ⅴ级营养化状态。湿地的Ⅲ、Ⅳ小区水面积最大,两区植物组成对磷均有较好的吸附、吸收和沉淀作用,但Ⅲ小区水体磷酸酶活性远高于Ⅳ小区,说明Ⅲ小区植物组成不利于抑制内源磷的释放,因此建议湿地水生植被重建时参考Ⅳ小区的(边岸区)华克拉莎-(深水区)密齿苦草/黑藻/马来眼子菜植物种类构成模式进行。枯水期早、中期湿地上覆水磷酸酶活性与上覆水活性反应磷浓度成反比例关系,说明研究期内湿地磷酸酶活性可作为水体富营养发展趋势的预警信息之一。

关键词: 桂林会仙喀斯特湿地, 上覆水, 磷酸酶活性

Abstract: Some chemical parameters and phosphase activity of the overlying water in the centre of Huixian Karst Wetland were analysed by 4-time water sampling (0.5 m deep) at 7 districts (the central wetland was divided into 7 districts) (10～15 sampling points in every District) in early stage,metaphase,and late stage during the dry season from 2009 to 2010.Results of the researchsuggested that the overlying water body in Huixian Karst Wetland was in a eutrophic state of.Scale Ⅳ～Ⅴ,refered to the evaluation criteria of Taihu Lake water body.In this wetland,District Ⅲ and Ⅳ are the two largest ones and so their principal character is representative.The plants growing in these two districts dobetter in adsorption,intake or precipitation of phosphorus.But the phosphase activity of the water body in District Ⅲ is much higher than that in District Ⅳ,which shows that composition of flora species in District Ⅳ is not propitious toset free its internal phosphorus.Based on the differences in TP,SRP and phosphase activity between District Ⅲ and Ⅳ,it is suggested that the restoration of aquatic vegetation in Huixian Karst Wetland should adopt the pattern of DistricttⅣ:Cladium chinense (planted in the shore zone)-Vallisneria denseserrulata/Hydrilla verticillat/Potamogeton malaianus (in the ballow).The relationshipbetween phosphase activity and SRP is inverse proportion for the whole researched water bodies in Huixian Karst Wetland in early stage,metaphase of its dry season,which suggests that phosphase activity can work as one of the prewarning information for eutrophication tendency of the water body in this Wetland during the testing period.

Key words: Guilin Huixian Karst Wetland, water body, phosphase activity

中图分类号:

X171.4

陆祖军, 侯美珍, 梁士楚. 会仙湿地中心区枯水期上覆水磷酸酶活性水平分布[J]. 广西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 29(1): 76-81.

LU Zu-jun, HOU Mei-zhen, LIANG Shi-chu. Phosphase Activity and Its Horizontal Distribution of the Water Body inCentral Region of Guilin Huixian Wetland During Dry Season[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 29(1): 76-81.

参考文献

[1] 吴应科,莫源富,邹胜章.桂林会仙岩溶湿地的生态问题及其保护对策[J].中国岩溶,2006,25(1):84-88.
[2] 蔡德所,马祖陆,赵湘桂,等.桂林会仙岩溶湿地近40年演变的遥感监测[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,27(2):111-117.
[3] 成小英,姜勤超,李世杰,等.桂林会仙喀斯特湿地沉积物摇蚊种群特征与环境变化[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,27(2):108-110.
[4] JIANG Ji-guo,SHEN Yun-Fen.Estimation of the natural purification rate of a eutrophic lake after pollutant removal[J].Ecological Engineering,2006,28(2):166-173.
[5] 李世杰,蔡德所,张宏亮,等.桂林会仙岩溶湿地环境变化沉积记录的初步研究[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,27(2):94-100.
[6] 柴夏,刘从玉,谢超,等.生态系统修复与构建过程中的水生植物品种选择——以惠州西湖生态系统的修复与构建工程为例[J].污染防治技术,2008,21(2):18-22.
[7] PETTERSSON K,JANSSON M.Determinations of phosphatase activity inlake water——a study of methods[J].Verh int Ver Limnol,1978,20:1226-1230.
[8] MARXSEN J U,SCHMIDT Hans-H.Extracellular phosphatase activity insediments of the Breitenbach,a Central European mountain stream[J].Hydrobiologia,1993,253:207-216.
[9] 郭芳,姜光辉.岩溶盆地中农业和村镇引起的地下水化学演变[J].地球与环境,2008,36(1):56-63.
[10] 陈进军,郑少奎.表面流人工湿地中水生植被的净化效应与组合系统净化效果[J].环境科学学报,2008,28(10):2029-2035.
[11] 贺丽虹,沈颂东.水葫芦对水体中氮磷的清除作用[J].淡水渔业,2005,35(3):7-9.
[12] 卢巧辉,陈庆华,张江山.用标准基准投影法综合评价水体水质[J].环境科学与管理,2006,31(7):189-191.
[13] 王庆安,黄时达.湿地植物光合作用向水体供氧能力的试验研究[J].生态学杂志,2000,9(5):45-51.
[14] 韦峰.桂林会仙喀斯特湿地生物多样性及保护研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学生命科学学院,2010.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed