Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 133-149.doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2024042202

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spatio-temporal Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in Tourist Cities: Taking Guilin City as an Example

TAN Yingying1,2,3,4, JIANG Yu1,2*, ZHOU Shaoqi3   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resource, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin Guangxi 541006, China;
    3. Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Yunnan 650201, China;
    4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2024-04-22 Revised:2024-06-09 Online:2025-01-05 Published:2025-02-07

Abstract: Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecosystem service values (ESV) in typical tourist cities plays a crucial role in formulating policies for urban conservation and environmental management. However, there is still a dearth of research on the spatiotemporal changes and spatial transfer networks of ESV in Guilin, Guangxi. With the six urban districts of Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, as the study area, this research employs equivalent factor correction and grid analysis methods to analyze the spatiotemporal changes in ESV based on land-use data spanning from 2000 to 2020. Leveraging the ecological service value equivalent factor table for Guilin, the breakpoint model and field strength model for ecological value transfer are applied to quantify the ESV transfer within the six districts, and visualize the spatial transfer network. The results indicated: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the total ESV in the six districts of Guilin showed a downward trend, decreasing from 2,866,942,700 yuan to 2,836,185,100 yuan. During the study period, each individual ESV component in these districts decreased over time, with the regulating services experiencing the most significant change. This suggested that urban expansion and land-use changes accompanying tourism development have had adverse impacts on ESV. (2) Among ecosystem service functions, climate regulation and hydrological regulation account for the largest proportions. The ranking of secondary ESV was: climate regulation > hydrological regulation > soil conservation > nutrient cycling maintenance > gas regulation > biodiversity > environmental purification > aesthetic landscape > food production > raw material production > water supply. The significant contribution of climate regulation is attributed to the vast forest area in Guilin, which played a pivotal role in regulating the climate. Climate and hydrological regulation were indispensible components of ecosystem services, essential for maintaining climatic stability, ensuring water supply, and mitigating natural disasters. (3) At a 1 km × 1 km grid scale, there were notable differences in the spatial distribution of ESV in Guilin. From 2000 to 2020, the area of high-ESV regions decreased over time, while the low-ESV regions were primarily concentrated in the northern part of Xiangshan District, the western part of Xiufeng District, the eastern part of Qixing District, and the southwest of Diecai District. Meanwhile, the area of regions with relatively high ESV increased over time, with Linggui District experiencing the most significant increase. This may be linked to urban development and construction, especially the "county-to-district" administrative reformation in Linggui. (4) The outward transfer of ESV among districts within the study area was ranked from largest to smallest as: Linggui District > Yanshan District > Diecai District > Xiufeng District > Xiangshan District > Qixing District. Hydrological regulation represented the service function with the highest transfer volume, accounting for 18.78% of the total ESV transfer in the study area. Regions with higher ESV tended to transfer more ESV externally. This study explores the status of ESV in the six urban districts of Guilin, Guangxi over a 20-year period and reveals the spatial transfer relationships among districts. It provides valuable insights into the spatiotemporal evolution of ESV in these districts, serving as a reference for future urban ecological protection, regional environmental management, and sustainable resource development.

Key words: ecosystem services values, spatio-temporal evolution, spatial transfer, breaking point model, field intensity model, Guilin, China

CLC Number:  X171.1
[1] World Resources Institute. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis[M]. Washing, DC: World Resources Institute, 2005.
[2] 谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞. 生态系统服务研究:进展、局限和基本范式[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 191-199. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0028.
[3] 赵军, 杨凯. 生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(1): 346-356. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.01.041.
[4] BRESLOW S J, SOJKA B, BARNEA R, et al. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016, 66: 250-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023.
[5] SUMMERS J K, SMITH L M, CASE J L, et al. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services[J]. AMBIO, 2012, 41(4): 327-340. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0256-7.
[6] KING M F, RENÓ V F, NOVO E M L M. The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: a literature review[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2014, 116(3): 681-698. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0.
[7] 傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(6): 571-576. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001.
[8] 马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7): 1277-1289. DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201707012.
[9] 赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 等. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 139-151. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015.
[10] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, De GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. DOI: 10.1038/387253a0.
[11] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010.
[12] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2008.05.019.
[13] ZHAO C, XIAO P N, QIAN P, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and balance pattern of ecosystem service supply and demand in the Yangtze river economic belt[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(12): 7223. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127223.
[14] LAI S, ZOPPI C. Factors affecting the supply of urban regulating ecosystem services. Empirical estimates from Cagliari, Italy[J]. TEMA-Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 2023(2): 7-32. DOI: 10.6093/1970-9870/10194.
[15] 唐秀美, 刘敏, 吴悠, 等. 国土综合整治与生态修复对区域生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(14): 5974-5984. DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202310102185.
[16] 韦飞, 钟佩. 基于GIS的山水型旅游城市生态敏感性分析: 以桂林市为例[J]. 桂林师范高等专科学校学报, 2021, 35(3): 38-42, 53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7070.2021.03.008.
[17] 朱赞, 王建琦, 莫瑞芳, 等. 基于Landsat遥感影像的桂林主城区土地利用变化监测[J]. 桂林航天工业学院学报, 2020, 25(4): 419-426. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1033.2020.04.002.
[18] 娄佩卿, 付波霖, 何宏昌, 等. 基于GEE的桂林市主城区热环境变化定量遥感分析[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2020, 40(2): 330-337. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2020.02.010.
[19] 桂林市人民政府. 2020年桂林市《政府工作报告》[R]. 桂林: 桂林市人民政府, 2020: 2-3.
[20] 桂林市统计局,国家统计局桂林调查队. 2019年桂林市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[N]. 桂林日报, 2020-04-27(02).
[21] 桂林经济社会统计年鉴编委会. 桂林市经济社会统计年鉴(2006—2017)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
[22] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001.
[23] 乔旭宁, 杨永菊, 杨德刚. 生态服务功能价值空间转移评价: 以渭干河流域为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(4): 1008-1014.
[24] 范小杉, 高吉喜, 温文. 生态资产空间流转及价值评估模型初探[J]. 环境科学研究, 2007, 20(5): 160-164. DOI: 10.13198/j.res.2007.05.162.fanxsh.031.
[25] 申梦姝, 郑航, 刘悦忆, 等. 2020年东江流域生态服务价值的空间转移网络研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(1): 124-134. DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2022.01.013.
[26] 张艳春,毛旭锋,魏晓燕,等. 湟水国家湿地公园湿地价值及其辐射格局研究们.生态学报,2022,42( 2): 569-580. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202101180188.
[27] 黄贞斌, 李红波. 武汉城市圈土地利用及生态系统服务价值时空演变多情景模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(12): 2542-2557. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202312008.
[28] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746.
[29] 陈璐, 牟子平, 秦惠平, 等. 湿地生态系统生态服务功能及其辐射效应研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2017, 40(5): 179-186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2017.05.030.
[30] BARTON D N. The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 42(1/2): 147-164. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00044-7.
[31] 涂纯, 罗为群, 陈雅祺, 等. 基于生态系统敏感性与服务功能的桂林喀斯特景观资源分区治理研究[J/OL]. 中国地质: 1-16[2024-04-02]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.p.20231107.1005.002.html.
[32] 李倩, 马姜明. 2009—2018年桂林市生态足迹动态变化与驱动力分析[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 41(4): 178-188. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2022071902.
[33] 吴振华, 俞钦平, 王亚蓓, 等. 景区扩容影响下的桂林市土地利用情景模拟与预测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(5): 131-139. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.017.
[34] 王笑影, 张慧, 朱文泉, 等. 基于三维生态足迹模型的桂林市2000—2018年生态承载力变化评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(6): 62-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.06.008.
[35] 张凯琪. 桂林市典型生态系统服务功能可持续研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2023.
[36] 资本飞. 玉溪市土地利用及其生态系统服务价值动态变化[J]. 地矿测绘, 2023, 39(2): 34-37, 59. DOI: 10.16864/j.cnki.dkch.2023.0022.
[37] 杨磊, 刘凤莲. 昆明市生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 国土资源导刊, 2023, 20(4): 125-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5603.2023.04.015.
[38] 许晓婷, 郭晓彤, 郭玲霞, 等. 咸阳市土地利用及生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 咸阳师范学院学报, 2024, 39(2): 42-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2914.2024.02.010.
[39] 马勇, 凌旋, 童昀. 格网尺度下典型旅游城市生态服务价值估算和时空分异特征:以三亚为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 7542-7554. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202002280364.
[40] 李萱, 李静芝. 湘西州土地利用与生态系统服务价值时空演变[J]. 地理空间信息, 2024, 22(4): 60-64. DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2024.04.014.
[41] 冶建明, 谢斯琦. 吐鲁番市土地利用转型及生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J]. 草业科学, 2024, 41(9):2164-2180. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2023-0296.
[42] 刘杰, 刘学录, 刘星雨, 等. 武山县生态系统服务价值时空变化分析[J/OL]. 甘肃农业大学学报: 1-18[2024-06-09]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1055.S.20231206.1006.017.html.
[43] 冯婧珂. 桂林市2000—2020年土地利用时空变化及其驱动力分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2022, 40(12): 101-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2022.12.030.
[44] 李红艳, 李晶. 关中-天水经济区生态系统服务价值转移研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(1): 86-91. DOI: 10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2014.01.016.
[45] 陈江龙, 徐梦月, 苏曦, 等. 南京市生态系统服务的空间流转[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(17): 5087-5095. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201308162095.
[46] 张霞. 基于供需关系的沈阳都市圈生态系统服务空间流转研究[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2023. DOI: 10.27212/d.cnki.glnsu.2023.000186.
[47] 杨玉盛. 全球环境变化对典型生态系统的影响研究:现状、挑战与发展趋势[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201701050044.
[48] 傅伯杰, 田汉勤, 陶福禄, 等. 全球变化对生态系统服务的影响研究进展[J]. 中国基础科学, 2020, 22(3): 25-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2412.2020.03.005.
[1] JIA Yanhong, WU Chunzhu, HU Hongwen, HUANG Junzhong , SU Xiaoqian. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern in Lijiang River Basin Based on Circuit Theory [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(5): 201-212.
[2] GAO Hongjuan, HAN Huiqing, LUO Xuqiang, LI Jinyan, CHEN Mengling, ZHANG Xinding. Effects of Land Use Change on Freshwater Ecosystem Services in Guizhou, China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(1): 157-163.
[3] ZHANG Fang. Ecological Landscape Patterns in Ebinur Lake Region Based on Remote Sensing [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 34(4): 156-164.
[4] LIANG Bao-ping, LI Yi, LIU Qing-ye. Analysis of Spatial Characteristics between Vegetation Index andLand Surface Temperature:A Case Study in Guilin City [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 30(2): 132-137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] HE Jing, FENG Yuanliu, SHAO Jingwen. Research Progress on Multi-source Data Fusion Based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(5): 13 -27 .
[2] LIU Changping, SONG Shuxiang, JIANG Pinqun, CEN Mingcan. Differential Passive N-path Filter Based on Switched Capacitors[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(5): 52 -60 .
[3] WANG Shuying, LU Yuxiang, DONG Shutong, CHEN Mo, KANG Bingya, JIANG Zhanglan, SU Chengyuan. Research Progress on the Propagation Process and Control Technology of ARGs in Wastewater[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 1 -15 .
[4] ZHONG Qiao, CHEN Shenglong, TANG Congcong. Hydrogel Technology for Microalgae Collection: Status Overview, Challenges and Development Analysis[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 16 -29 .
[5] ZHAI Siqi, CAI Wenjun, ZHU Su, LI Hanlong, SONG Hailiang, YANG Xiaoli, YANG Yuli. Dynamic Relationship Between Reverse Solute Flux and Membrane Fouling in Forward Osmosis[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 30 -39 .
[6] ZHENG Guoquan, QIN Yongli, WANG Chenxiang, GE Shijia, WEN Qianmin, JIANG Yongrong. Stepwise Precipitation of Heavy Metals from Acid Mine Drainage and Mineral Formation in Sulfate-Reducing Anaerobic Baffled Reactor System[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 40 -52 .
[7] LIU Yang, ZHANG Yijie, ZHANG Yan, LI Ling, KONG Xiangming, LI Hong. Current Status and Trends of Algal Coagulation Elimination Technology in Drinking Water Treatment: a Visual Analysis Based on CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 53 -66 .
[8] TIAN Sheng, CHEN Dong. A Joint Eco-driving Optimization Research for Connected Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle via Deep Reinforcement Learning[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 67 -80 .
[9] CHEN Xiufeng, WANG Chengxin, ZHAO Fengyang, YANG Kai, GU Kexin. A Single Intersection Signal Control Method Based on Improved DQN Algorithm[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 81 -88 .
[10] LI Xin, NING Jing. Online Assessment of Transient Stability in Power Systems Based on Spatiotemporal Feature Fusion[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(6): 89 -100 .