Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition) ›› 2010, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 80-83.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of Different Digestion Methods in Analyzing Heavy Metals Content in Soils

DENG Hua1,2, XU Dan-dan2,3, LI Ming-shun1,2, LI Jin-cheng2,3   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resources,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541004,China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering Protected and Assessment,Guangxi Normal University, Guilin Guangxi 541004,China;
    3. College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Guilin University of Technology, Guilin Guangxi 541004,China
  • Received:2010-03-24 Online:2010-09-20 Published:2023-02-06

Abstract: Four kinds of soil were digested by electric heatingboard digestion and microwave digestion with two kinds of acid system respectively.Subsequently,concentration of Cu、Pb、Cr、Zn、Mn in the soils was determinated.The results showed that concentration of Cu、Pb、Zn in the standard soil sample digested by the four methods in good agreement with the reference values.The determinated value of Mn concentration in the standard soil sample digested by the two microwave digestionmethods in good agreement with the reference value.Only determinated valueof Cr concentration in the standard soil sample digested by microwave digestion method with HNO3+HF+HClO4 agreed with the reference value.There was no significant differencein the concentration of Cu、Pb、Zn in the standard soil sample,soil A (sampled from biological garden of Guangxi Normal University),soil B and soil C (sampled from recovery region and tailing region of Guangxi Lipu Manganese mine).But there was significant difference in the concentration of Cr in the four soils andin the concentration of Mn in the soil B.Conclusively,microwave digestion method with HNO3+HF+HClO4 was the most ideal method which could digest effectively all of the five heavy metals in the soils.

Key words: soil digestion, microwave digestion, electric heatingboard digestion, heavy metals

CLC Number: 

  • X131.3
[1] 王京文,徐文,周航,等.土壤样品中重金属消解方法的探讨[J].浙江农业科学,2007,19(2):223-225.
[2] 黄智伟,王宪,邱海源,等.土壤重金属含量的微波法与电热板消解法测定的应用比较[J].厦门大学学报:自然科学版,2007,46(Z1):103-106.
[3] 任海仙,王迎进.微波消解-火焰原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中重金属元素的含量[J].分子科学学报,2009,25(3):213-216.
[4] 马剑丽,倪群英.微波消解-火焰原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中铜锌铅镍锰[J].广州化工,2006,34(4):61-62.
[5] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:147-211.
[6] 罗小红,何靖,林毓.沸水浴王水提取土壤样品Pb、Cr、Cd、As的探讨[J].广西农业科学,2007,38(5):547-549.
[7] 唐文杰,李明顺.广西锰矿区废弃地优势植物重金属含量及富集特征[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(5):1757-1763.
[8] 刘凤枝,刘潇威.土壤和固体废弃物监测分析技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007:217-218.
[1] PENG Limei, ZHAO Li, ZHOU Wu, HU Yueming. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Cultivated Land in Conghua District of Guangzhou City, China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 38(5): 118-129.
[2] XU Tingting, YU Qiuping, QI Peiyi, LIU Kehui, LI Yi, JIANG Yongrong, YU Fangming. Effects of Different Washing Solutions on the Desorption of Heavy Metals from a Lead-zinc Mine Soil [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 37(2): 188-193.
[3] ZHENG Haixia, WANG Yue, CHEN Fen, GOU Chaoyang, ZHENG Qingrong. Pollution Characteristics and Potential Ecological Risk Assessmentof Soil Heavy Metal in the South Top of Wutai Mountain, Shanxi, China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(4): 99-107.
[4] ZHANG Jun, LI Dao-hong, DU Dian-song. Enrichment of Heavy Metals in Diestrammena from Longjing Cave and Bailong Cave of Guizhou,China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 30(4): 104-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!